Hi T8:

Actually, the scripture does not say “his name is the Word of God”.

YLT has it:

Rev 19:

13 and he is arrayed with a garment covered with blood, and his name is called, The Word of God.

There is a difference in saying “his name is”, and  “his name is called”  The Word of God.

As I have stated, “his name is called” pertains to his ch…

[Read more]

Hi T8,

Was he always known as Jesus? No

Does it mean he always existed ?No.

Listen to the Spirit in the man

Nick, no one is saying that he existed as a man called Jesus in Heaven. I have said this a number of times before. Do you have ears to hear?

He existed in the form of God, emptied himself, and came in the flesh.

Jesus Christ came in the…[Read more]

Hi t8,

God has visited His people.

You need to see beyond the flesh to the treasure within.

Nick, Jesus Christ came in the flesh to save those in the flesh. He was born a baby like us. He came to us as one of us, so we could be one of him. He is the son of God and we can be sons of God.

The treasure within is the Kingdom of God. Eternal life in…[Read more]

Hi t8,

God has visited His people.

You need to see beyond the flesh to the treasure within.

Nick, Jesus came in the flesh to save those in the flesh. He came to us as one of us, so we could be one of him. He is the son of God and we can be sons of God.

The treasure within is the Kingdom of God. Eternal life in God and through the son.

You…[Read more]

Hi T8,

But you give no respect to the work of the Spirit in and through the man Jesus.

Your view of him is as the world sees.

No Nick, you are wrong.

Jesus certainly spoke the words of God and always said and did the Father’s will. I have said this before.

Because I recognise this of Jesus, you condemn me. You want to remove Jesus out of the…[Read more]

Hi T8,

You seem to express opinions rather than show truth.

Is this your opinion?

(Emphasis mine.)

Hi t8,

To repeat.

Jesus is the anointed one, the Christ, the Son of the living God.

He has the words of eternal life.

 

His words are spirit and life.

This is true. But this is not what you were teaching earlier was it. You taught that Jesus is a flesh man only created 2000 or so year ago, and that flesh counts for nothing. Thus the…[Read more]

Hi T8,

Do you realise that you deny the work of the Spirit in Jesus Christ?

Yet you teach and reprove others.

That is what you say Nick. But you are not the truth. Jesus is the truth and his words are true. I trust his words, not yours. Hopefully that doesn’t upset you, but if you read what I am saying here, then you have to agree.

Hi T8,

The obvious meaning is what Jesus chersir taught.

That the Spirit spoke through him.

Nick is that you, or the Spirit that you speak of.

Hi t8,

The anointed words of the anointed man burn themselves into the hearts of believers . Lk 24.32

But, for some reason, you only hear a man speaking.

Which words do not come from God?

If you really want the job of the religious Pharisee who goes around judging everyone but himself, then go ahead. I do not recommend it, but it is your…[Read more]

a) “Abraham your father rejoiced that he might see my day”or
b) “Your father Abraham rejoiced to see my day”

Both speak of a day in Abraham’s future so clearly Jesus is not claiming his day is before Abraham’s.

Are you suggesting that Jesus came from the future then travelled to the past?

The point here is, how did Jesus know this about Abrah…[Read more]

a) “Abraham your father rejoiced that he might see my day”or
b) “Your father Abraham rejoiced to see my day”

Both speak of a day in Abraham’s future so clearly Jesus is not claiming his day is before Abraham’s.

Are you suggesting that Jesus came from the future and to the past?

The point here is, how did Jesus know this about Abraham? Th…[Read more]

That would contradict the prophecy of the five empires and Scripture is not broken.

Revelation

Egypt – 3100 to ? (Genesis 12:10)
Assyria – 2500 BC to 605 BC (Genesis 2:14)

Daniel & Revelation

Babylon – 612 – 539 BC (Daniel 1:1)
Medo-Persia – 539 – 331 BC (Daniel 5:28)
Greecia – 331 – 168 BC (Daniel 10:20)
Rome – 168-476 AD / 1453 AD –…

[Read more]

That would contradict the prophecy of the five empires and Scripture is not broken.

Revelation

Egypt – 3100 to ? (Genesis 12:10)
Assyria – 2500 BC to 605 BC (Genesis 2:14)

Daniel

Babylon – 612 – 539 BC (Daniel 1:1)
Medo-Persia – 539 – 331 BC (Daniel 5:28)
Greecia – 331 – 168 BC (Daniel 10:20)
Rome – 168-476 AD / 1453 AD – inc Byzantine…

[Read more]

That would contradict the prophecy of the five empires and Scripture is not broken.

Revelation

Egypt – 3100 to ? (Genesis 12:10)
Assyria – 2500 BC to 605 BC (Genesis 2:14)

Daniel

Babylon – 612 – 539 BC (Daniel 1:1)
Medo-Persia – 539 – 331 BC (Daniel 5:28)
Greecia – 331 – 168 BC (Daniel 10:20)
Rome – 168-476 AD / 1453 AD – inc Byzantine…

[Read more]

That would contradict the prophecy of the five empires and Scripture is not broken.

As for the five kings/empires versus seven, that can be explained by the two empires predating the time of Daniel (Egypt & Assyria) which would not have been of significant at that time as God gave a vision of the future only, while Revelation appears to give us…[Read more]

That would contradict the prophecy of the five empires and Scripture is not broken.

Nebuchadnezzar Statue
As for the five kings/empires versus seven, that can be explained by the two empires predating the time of Daniel (Egypt & Assyria) which would not have been of significant at that time as God gave a vision of the future only, while…[Read more]

That would contradict the prophecy of the five empires and Scripture is not broken.

As for the five kings/empires versus seven, that can be explained by the two empires predating the time of Daniel (Egypt & Assyria) which would not have been of significant at that time as God gave a vision of the future only, while Revelation appears to give us…[Read more]

t8,

The Seventh may be the European Union though it is an extremely loose confederacy right now.

Could be. One way it could happen is with Islamic immigration and the rise of terror. This could force Europe to invest in futuristic surveillance technology and the opposition to all religions. If a leader rose up within that political system, it…[Read more]

t8,

I know that Persia-Media overtook Neo-Babylon in a night and that Rome gradually swallowed Greece. Greece, actually Macedonia, took Peria-Media fairly quickly with Alexander the Great at the helm. The Ottoman Empire fell at the end of World WarII. There is not gap between them but there is an overlap, even if it is very small.

Overlaps are…[Read more]