Removing all feelings and emotions and looking at the facts only, those who teach lies are either doing it intentionally or are deceived in that area at least. If a person is deceived and then shown proof or even strong evidence to the contrary, the person has a choice, they either change or become more wilfully deceived and more wilfully they…[Read more]

So if Jesus is God, then he is the son of himself.

No.

He is either God or His Son.

Nature is not idetity.

2 Chron 7:14 if my people who are called by my name humble themselves, pray, seek my face, and turn from their wicked ways, then I will hear from heaven, and will forgive their sin and heal their land.

This is not personal but us about the collective. If yiy could be forgiven for all sin, then why the need for the shedding of blood to cover…[Read more]

The soul that sins will die. You will die. We all will die. Is that it. The God of the cosmos will let us all eternally die. Never to have life again.

We have a glorious hope because we accepted the messiah. What is your hope gadam?

The NT teaches about the natral body and spiritual body. How we imagine that is up for grabs. But it is part of the NT.

Mike, who was it that apologized for using the word lie. I doubt that was me. Are you saying that it was me?

Now to be rational about what you have said above. I believed and still believe you were and are teaching lies on this subject. I even spelled out that to teach lies, one must be an intenional liar or deceived.

Please explain why this…[Read more]

Sorry no such expectation of Virgin born Messiah by the Hebrew please.

Young girl.

Yahweh appeared to him by the oaks of Mamre, as he sat in the tent door in the heat of the day.

He is the image of the invisible God. He is the Word. He speaks on behalf of God. He represents God. The Messenger of God.

Now, if everyone who was called “theos” was also called “YHVH.” that is where the mass confusion would come. So we are to follow after the theos who is YHVH. It just so happens that the Father is the theos who is identified as YHVH and the Son is the theos who is identified as YHVH. They are both identified as the theos in the NT and they are bot…

[Read more]

I will repeat this in case my post is too long for you to read.

So yes, many can be called ‘theos’ (singular), just not when referencing them in plural.

Move on please.

“It simply is saying that ‘theos’ can be applied to one or many.”

That is what is not true because the plural is not spelled t h e o s, as you finally realized, as well as the fact that you included theos as an example of a word that is spelled the same in the plural as in the singular in your “sheep list.”

Yes I have already acknowledged the plu…[Read more]

I’ll explain it another way.

First came the law, then came grace.

You are free to not believe.

For the law was given through Moses; grace and truth came through Jesus Christ.

By the way, the plan is still in action. There is further revelation to come.

Your view appears to be more about the constraints of your own mind than what the Old…[Read more]

Then you question your Old Testament my friend. If the NT writers claimed to have got new secret revelation as often quoted by you here they could have very well done without quoting the so called Old Testament. If you want a new revelation and a new religion we have plenty here in our India. We need not look to the Christian one.

I’ve already…[Read more]

I think this is going little personally as your posts are attacking on personal spirituality which is not warranted on these unending debates. I have also asked you to study the Torah and get enlightened which you seem to ignore and take it so lightly. Please stop this black mailing with words like ‘carnal’ and ‘born  from above’ which are simp…

[Read more]

Your second example contains your own words which I have no control over. That is not proof or evidence that I have said you are a liar is it?

If you cannot provide even one example Mike, then you are falsely accusing me.

Please provide an example or admit you are wrong.

Thanks.

Excuse me, but the statement I make in your first quote is correct. It stands on its own. Do you think we cannot utter this? Is this statement incorrect? You first example is a fail. It doesn’t show me saying, Mike is a liar for example.

Agreed. He is quick to call others liars, or insinuate that they are less enlightened than him, just because they interpret certain information differently than he does. I have condemned this behavior many times on this forum.

Show me the proof. A link to a post will be sufficient.

Hi Edj, good to hear from you after long time. The calculations based on the book of Daniel by assigning year to day principle is a mere speculation

Lol. Of course it is speculation. Did you just work that out. Or are you speculating,

@edj

Are you still on for believing the end of the dome of the rock 8n 2023?