The word 'depressed' is not mentioned in the NIV, NASB, RSV, KJV, Darby, YLT & the WE.Neither is the word 'depression'. 'Depressions' is mentioned in Leviticus 14:37, but that has a completely different meaning.The word 'despair' is found in the following scriptures in the NIV version.Deuteronomy 28:65Among those nations you will find no repose,…[Read more]

To Iyyob, No not at all.Different expectations at different times. God allowed intermarriage of families in the beginning, but was forbidden in the Law.Yahweh wanted to be Israel's King and the people wanted a King like the other nations. So God gave into their wants and set up King David on the throne to rule over them. But this came at a price,…[Read more]

Quote Bottom line ; no ; except he repents. ( personal note)Once you are enlighten unto the Lord and know His ways you are subject to the law. Paul gave an example for it would be better to be like him ( without a wife ) . In good conscience we cannot divorce our wives. But if she divorces him. It would be better not to marry again.            …[Read more]

Quote Quote: from Iyyob on 5:33 am on Jan. 11, 2004t8You said NEW TESTAMENT was not reliable?The verse I gave you was in Deuteronomy?Do you not believe to First Volume either?On what do you base your beliefs?Do you really want to know what the Scriptures say or not?IyyobTo Iyyob,Your verse in the Old Testament also quotes the following:18 If a…[Read more]

The Book called “A Divine Revelation of hell” by Mary K Baxter, talks of her experience of being shown hell and contains vivid descriptions therein.One interesting account talks about Paradise and she says that in Hades/Grave ?  the part that use to be called Paradise as recorded in the Lararus scripture, is now part of hell as hell is increasing…[Read more]

Yes I have prayed for each one. It is good too see that you care and you believe in the power of prayer.

Amen.It is really obvious. God sent his Son. God didn’t send himself.

Hi thehappyman, I couldn’t make out what you were saying till I realised you were talking about the "Yahweh" bible.Kinda funny because I thought you were talking about Yahweh (God).cya

Taken from http://www.tegart.com This is for reference only, and I am not endorsing the conclusion found at the end of this article.========A Simple Outline regarding I John 5:7by Doug KutilekI John 5: 7For there are three that bear record in heaven, the Father, The Word, and the Holy Ghost:  and these three are one. It is generally agreed that v. 7 has…[Read more]

The complete absence of I John 5:7 from any of Luther's various editions and revisions of his Bible translation is confirmed by a number of sources.  First, Karl Braune in Lange's commentary, informs us regarding the disputed words:Luther never translated these words, but commented upon them in his second commentary on this Epistle, although he…[Read more]

It seems that there is a great debate raging on both sides as to the authenticity of 1 John 5:7, yet most (including Trinitarians) seem to believe that the verse was not penned by John.(“For there are three that bear record in heaven, the Father, the Word, and the Holy Ghost: and these three are one.”)First of all I would like to quote from a…[Read more]

Thx Peggy, I took for granted that I John 5:7 was a spurious addition to the text and was not penned by any biblical writer and the reason for it was omitted in modern translations. I was even told this by a close friend of mine who is a Trintarian who told me that the verse is actually a footnote in the Textus Receptus. So I guess I better do the…[Read more]

Hi Peggy,Sorry I made a mistake when I quoted the following paragraph.The last word god is not talking about God the person, rather God in nature. If the last part said  “THE Word was with THE God” this would actually disqualify the Father as God because it would mean that the Word was exclusively God.I meant to say the following:“THE Word was…[Read more]

Hi Peggy,Thank you for your post.John 1:1 is probably the major verse used to support the Trinity, yet even Trinitarian scholars admit that it doesn't say that the Word is God the person. The reason is that the last word 'God' has no article and articles are used in Greek to define people. E.g. 'The Jesus' when we would just sayJesus.This is how…[Read more]

Yahweh is the Most High God. For there are many gods and many lords, but true believers acknowledge the One True God and Most High as their God. Yahweh’s children are filled with his Spirit and call him Father.

When an organisation or group of people claim to be the way, I am immediately suspicious of such people as Jesus said he was the Way. Even Paul, Peter, John etc never said they were the way. They always acknowledged Yeshua as the Way to Yahweh. The true children of God acknowledge and promote the Way, they never say that they are the Way…[Read more]

We have to agree to differ on the New Testament as being reliable. Anybody else out there that can answer my original question from either the Old or New Testaments?

Yes it is a title, just like “Father” is.Nothing wrong with titles. The Heavenly Father (Yahweh) is the Most High God and Yashua is the Son of God, just as we are sons of God. These titles are used throughout scripture.Deuteronomy 10:17For Yahweh your God is God of gods and Lord of lords, the great God, mighty and awesome, who shows no partiality…[Read more]

Um, I thought about it.Worshipping God any day of the week is good. We should always praise the name of the Most High God.What makes you think that worshipping God on Sunday or any other day for that matter is wrong? Worshipping on Sunday, Monday or whatever has nothing to do with keeping the Sabbath holy. Please explain why worshipping God at…[Read more]

I have decided to pass on the subject on the “Dead in Christ” to a more relevant current post and keep this Post for the subject of “What is Heaven”.The link is below:The Dead in Christ