Quote (acertainchap @ Jan. 26 2008,11:46)Quote (t8 @ Jan. 26 2008,00:51)Miracles are not there to prove God's existence, but to prove that God is with someone because of the miracles done through him.I'm going to have to disagree, t8. Miracles are proof of God's existence and proof that He is with us.Of course miracles are proof of God's…[Read more]

Quote (WorshippingJesus @ Jan. 26 2008,12:09)Confusion.t8Which scriptures do you disagree with or confuse you?I disagree with the reasoning that is made in order to preserve a doctrine that was NEVER taught in scripture.Your methodology is similar to other denominations methodology.A railroad of scriptures in a certain order to paint a picture…[Read more]

Quote (kejonn @ Jan. 27 2008,12:07)So now both you and Nick support smart people being excluded from the kingdom? I wonder how many more Christians want to say people who are intelligent will be lost.Is that comment for me Kejonn?

That is true. But he doesn't reveal everything at once.E.g., we will know the time/season of the coming, but not the day or hour.

Quote (kejonn @ Jan. 27 2008,09:34)No one here has made a very good case using the OT to support Jesus being the coming son of David that was spoken of. That to me does not mean he is not our savior, but it does mean he was perhaps not meant to be the Jewish coming king.Perhaps. But it certainly doesn't mean that he will not be the Jewish coming…[Read more]

Perhaps. But it certainly doesn't mean that he will not be the Jewish coming King.This too could have been concealed for good reason.1 Corinthians 2:8None of the rulers of this age understood it, for if they had, they would not have crucified the Lord of glory.So if they didn't understand it, then was all this suppose to be common knowledge?…[Read more]

Quote (kejonn @ Jan. 27 2008,09:12)Quote (t8 @ Jan. 26 2008,16:08)Quote (kejonn @ Jan. 26 2008,01:17)Yes, it is not necessary to match Jesus up to the coming son of David that the Jews expected. That is why he was not — and is still not — accepted by most of them. Jewish Christianity died with James and his fellows. Roman Christianity is what we…[Read more]

Quote (kejonn @ Jan. 26 2008,01:17)Yes, it is not necessary to match Jesus up to the coming son of David that the Jews expected. That is why he was not — and is still not — accepted by most of them. Jewish Christianity died with James and his fellows. Roman Christianity is what we have today.Just a general statement Kejonn, but it is not…[Read more]

Quote (WorshippingJesus @ Jan. 26 2008,11:20)Quote (WorshippingJesus @ Jan. 26 2008,06:24)MrsSo how many spirits are in you? The Fathers Spirit, The Spirit of the Son. or the Holy Spirit? When are you going to get it? Quote (t8 @ Jan. 26 2008,10:25)1 Corinthians 12:13For we were all baptized by one Spirit into one body—whether Jews or Greeks, s…[Read more]

Thanks for sharing.

Quote (acertainchap @ Jan. 12 2008,06:37)Testing 12345678910Testing 1234567891011I did one better than you acertainchap.

Quote (Not3in1 @ June 28 2007,15:48)Actually, just FYI, I own the “Should you believe the Trinity” pamphlet that is on the screen-thing, and it is a TRINITARIAN brochure. Funny!You own what pamphlet?

Kejonn that is an extreme view of what I am saying.I am saying that God performs miracles through his representatives to demonstrate that his rep is of him A lack of miracles in ones life is not a sure sign that a person has no faith, but a person who has no belief in a God of miracles surely lacks faith, for God is a god of miracles, signs, and…[Read more]

Quote (WorshippingJesus @ Jan. 26 2008,06:24)MrsSo how many spirits are in you? The Fathers Spirit, The Spirit of the Son. or the Holy Spirit? When are you gonna get it? 1 Corinthians 12:13For we were all baptized by one Spirit into one body—whether Jews or Greeks, slave or free—and we were all given the one Spirit to drink.See that?Luke 3:1…[Read more]

Quote (Stu @ Jan. 23 2008,22:03)It is a dazzling but pointless restatement of the argument from design.At face value acknowledging a designer is far more reasonable than saying it all came from nothing or from something inanimate.But Stu writes off the most reasonable explanation because he has no faith. So his arguments are based on ignorance. So…[Read more]

Quote (Towshab @ Jan. 18 2008,13:20)The need for men to prove G-d with supposed miracles shows that they need such to prove G-d. Weak. If G-d wants me to experience a true miracle to enhance my faith in Him, then He will do it. He will not just depend on words written by men so long ago. Since He knows I do not need to see these miracles, then…[Read more]

http://wiki.answers.com/Q….so_fat.

WJ, the Trinity Doctrine is false.There is no point in promoting falseness.

It's quite simple.A purely natural man cannot comprehend things of the spirit.So that is the reason anyone writes off spiritual.The carnal mind cannot grasp that anything can be eternal and it cannot grasp that anything may not be of this realm.Therefore it is not an intellectual thing at all. The intellect that is guided by carnality is just…[Read more]

Not at all Stu. I have no fear in criticism of my faith. In fact a challenge is good.Rather it is just a practical thing that non-believers not post in that category because what they have to say is completely unrelated to the topics there and will only be disruptive.There are other forums where you are free to post about your beliefs that are…[Read more]