Yes that is true. When you find yourself on the other side of what the scriptures say, you have at least 3 choices. Change, don't change and feel bad, or don't change and believe that scripture is not credible.

At least in there it cannot be trampled upon.

Quote (Not3in1 @ Aug. 15 2008,15:31)Parts of NZ look a lot like Seattle, WA.  Your tower also looks like our Space Needle.  Neat!  Although we do not have deserts and tropical elements.Thanks for sharing about you and your family, t8.  Let's see, you have a two year old…..time to add a sibling, huh?   Love,MandyYeah that tower is suppose to b…[Read more]

More Colombia.

Here is Colombia:

Thanks Irene. Yes two year olds are really wonderful. They are just so cute and it is great watching someone grow up and experience things for the first time. You kind of go through everything yourself with them.Here are some pics of New Zealand.

To Gene.Quote (Gene Balthrop @ Aug. 15 2008,14:07)The word (Word) is not a noun it is a descriptor and describes what was and  it was with the ONLY TRUE GOD.Actually, the Logos is associated with the definite article. Your argument ignores this.THE Logos.THE God.If you think God is a person/identity, then that is because it is associated with the…[Read more]

Quote (WorshippingJesus @ Aug. 15 2008,12:47)So now you misrepresent my words.I said there is no “credible translation”. And all of the translations disagree with you on biblegateway.com and blueletterbible.org.It seems to me that you are saying that translators, and the majority doctrines of Christendom are beyond question and we should just…[Read more]

To doubt what these men have said about God is to doubt their experience and communication with God.In that case, he may doubt his own experience with God too.Doubt being the keyword. Doubt leads to unbelief and men are certainly entitled to not believe.

Thanks goll.

Quote (WorshippingJesus @ Aug. 15 2008,12:56)If the “Word was God by nature” then how could he be less than God?If we partake in divine nature, then how can we be less than God?Hmmm.Still cannot grasp the difference between identity and nature can you?One is an actual person and the other is the quality or nature of the person. So there is Adam…[Read more]

Quote (WorshippingJesus @ Aug. 15 2008,12:52)Quote (t8 @ Aug. 15 2008,12:46)Taken from Wikipedia.After giving as a translation of John 1:1c “and divine (of the category divinity) was the Word,” Haenchen goes on to state: “In this instance, the verb 'was' () simply expresses predication. And the predicate noun must accordingly be more carefully…[Read more]

Quote (WorshippingJesus @ Aug. 15 2008,13:01)Give me one example where the word “theos” is ascribed to any other being with the definite article besides the arch enemy of God!Yeshua is not an opposite.I don't have to because theos as applied to judges or elohim as applied to angels is an authority/quality/thing given by the true God. But Satan is…[Read more]

Quote (WorshippingJesus @ Aug. 15 2008,13:01)Are you comparing Yeshua with satan?No of course not. I am showing you some language construction. It has nothing to do with likening God and Satan, except to say that they are 2 different beings who are both called theos and The theos too.But one is the God of this age, and the other is the God of all,…[Read more]

Quote (WorshippingJesus @ Aug. 15 2008,12:56)If the “Word was God by nature” then how could he be less than God?OK, maybe we are making some progress now.If Adam was adam/man in nature how could he be less than Man?Well there is only one Adam (well actually 2 if you count the second Adam) and there are billions of adams.So Jesus is not God (the…[Read more]

Quote (WorshippingJesus @ Aug. 15 2008,12:45)t8You didnt answer the question?We are not talking about the OT. We are talking about the NT.Give me one example where the word “theos” is ascribed to any other being with the definite article besides the arch enemy of God!WJ2 Corinthians 4:4The god of this age has blinded the minds of unbelievers, so…[Read more]

Taken from Wikipedia.After giving as a translation of John 1:1c “and divine (of the category divinity) was the Word,” Haenchen goes on to state: “In this instance, the verb 'was' () simply expresses predication. And the predicate noun must accordingly be more carefully observed: is not the same thing as ('divine' is not the same thing as…[Read more]

Quote (WorshippingJesus @ Aug. 15 2008,12:40)t8But you just quoted this…Quote “In the beginning the Word existed. The Word was with God, and the Word was divine.”An American Translation, Edgar Goodspeed and J. M. Powis Smith, The University of Chicago Press, p. 173″The Logos (word) existed in the very beginning, and the Logos was with God, the…[Read more]