A fourth beast, with large iron teeth and ten horns

A fourth beast.–This is so different from the preceding three, and so terrible in appearance, that Daniel can hardly find words to describe it. The distinguishing feature of it is the power which it possesses of breaking and stamping out all that it meets. In this way it corresponds to “iron…[Read more]

A beast like a bear standing with three ribs in its mouth

One side.—In explaining this very difficult phrase, it must be remembered that the two sides of the bear are parallel in meaning to the two breasts and two arms of the Colossus. It is implied, therefore, that the second kingdom consists of two parts, and the raising up of one side imp…[Read more]

A winged lion-like beast relief from the ancient city of Babylon

The four beasts of Daniel’s vision:

1. A beast like a lion with eagle’s wings (verse 4) ✓
2. A beast like a bear standing with three ribs in its mouth (verse 5).
3. A beast like a leopard with four bird’s wings and four heads (verse 6).
4. A fearful beast different from the others…

[Read more]

Proclaimer……Remember Daniel was already existing in the First kingdom of Gold, when he was given that prophecy , so if he were predicting future events, he was not speaking about the kingdom he was already in. He meant Four “more ” to come .

There are 4 metals and 4 beasts.

 You are that head of gold. “After you, another kingdom will arise, infe…[Read more]

Archaeology is confirming Bible Characters and Places

In chapter 7, Daniel has a vision of four beasts coming up out of the sea, and is told that they represent four kingdoms:

A beast like a lion with eagle’s wings (v. 4).
A beast like a bear, raised up on one side, with three ribs between its teeth (v. 5).
A beast like a leopard with four wings of fowl and four heads (v. 6).
A fourth beast, with…[Read more]

Please go through my same post for your no 1 query…..

Your posts are too long. Perhaps because they are copied and pasted?

Please answer this. I don;t need an essay. It will take you 5 minutes.

What is your no1 reason for believing that the Book of Daniel doesn’t couple Media and Persia as one empire and metal (even though it does)?

Long haul flight tracks across Antarctica
Australian airline Qantas has set a company record by flying a one-off direct flight from Buenos Aires to the city of Darwin in Australia’s Northern Territory. 

The plane left Argentina at 12:44 pm local time on Tuesday, October 5, then flew south, crossed Antarctica, and arrived in Darwin at 6:39 pm…[Read more]

Facebook Whistleblower Frances Haugen

Not a single thing claimed here is true.

What is the no1 proof you have according to you?

Not a single thing claimed here is true.

What is the no1 proof you have according to you?

Once again, it’s the opposite of what you say.

The feet are not only connected but infused with the iron legs.

He wanted to show four world empires through the image of Nebuchadnezzar. These four empires were Babylon, Media, Persia and Greece.

But I’ve clearly proved to you that Media and Persia were considered one kingdom from the Book of Daniel itself. So any verses in that book that you reference need to be placed in that context. You can only change…[Read more]

Thanks Berean. Some good descriptions in that post.

Please show me at least one reference to Rome in whole of Daniel as a world kingdom as you repeatedly stick to your traditional view.

Are you silly? The Roman Empire didn’t exist yet. Lol. You might need to revise your history.

Prophecy talks about the future. You test prophecy by seeing if it came to past.

That is what I am doing. Looking at…[Read more]

Any interpretation that makes Media and Persia two kingdoms does not agree with the Book of Daniel.

Rome was a significant kingdom. Far greater than you give it credit for it seems. It had two legs and lasted 1000 years more than most think too. While the East was taken over by the Ottomans, the West divided into roughly 10 nations.

Media and…[Read more]

Christian interpretations are a dime a dozen just as scientific interpretations are. It’s a natural consequence of investigating something that needs interpreting. No big deal. Some theories are better than others.

Why the Medes and Persians are considered one kingdom in the Book of Daniel
“This was the dream, and now we will interpret it to the king. 37 Your Majesty, you are the king of kings. The God of heaven has given you dominion and power and might and glory; 38 in your hands he has placed all mankind and the beasts of the field and the birds in the s…[Read more]

The Book of Daniel states that the kingdom was given to the Medes and the Persians, thus according to that book, these two were one empire. So that leaves Rome as the two legs. Simple.