Thanks wild_olive_branch.And I never saw the word “tri nit arian” like that before. It even has the word Arian in it.

Quote (WorshippingJesus @ May 08 2009,08:37)“WHO, BEING IN VERY NATURE GOD”, did not consider equality with God something to be grasped, Phil 2:6HE IS THE IMAGE OF THE INVISIBLE GOD, the firstborn over all creation. Col 1:15The Son is the radiance of God's glory and “THE EXACT REPRESENTATION OF HIS BEING”,… Heb 1:3Those 3 scriptures are prime…[Read more]

Thanks Georg, I will read what you have said. But I just noticed your first comment about twisting words. I tried to put your symbols into the text and then gave you an opportunity to correct anything that I may have got wrong. How is that twisting the words? The words I used was the scripture substituted with your symbols. i.e.,”He had two horns…[Read more]

What are you talking about?

How are we born from above?

Quote (t8 @ May 12 2009,22:25)The Pope looked like a lamb but spoke like a dragon. The Pope made all inhabitants worship the Roman Empire.The Pope did miraculous signs in full view of men.By reason of these false signs, the pope decieved the inhabitants of the earth.The Pope ordered the inhabitants of the earth to set up a church.The Pope gave…[Read more]

You wrote the following:1) Beast————–Ruler/government2) Antichrist———-the Pope3) False prophet——the pope4) Image of the Beast-the pope5) Babylon————the Catholic church, and all false religion.Then I tried to fit that into Revelation 13:11-17 and using your key I got the following:The Pope looked like a lamb but spoke…[Read more]

Georg, I am just making a fair and deep look at your interpretation of Revelation 13:11-17 based on what it is saying to see if that is what you are saying. I have no other motive but to see if what you are saying is written. I am not judging anything but by the very scripture itself and it is written to give an answer for what you believe and I…[Read more]

Sorry Stu. This video is not about showing physical proof to a non-physical God.It is there for those who have a certain faith to framework their science.Your faith that you frame your science in is nothing. That is fine (for you), but many choose not to believe in nothing for obvious reasons.All science is framed in a belief of some kind and that…[Read more]

Thanks for your post LU.

Romans 1:20For since the creation of the world God's invisible qualities—his eternal power and divine nature—have been clearly seen, being understood from what has been made, so that men are without excuse.God doesn't have to provide any additional proof than that which is clearly there already.However God is merciful and sometimes does prove him…[Read more]

OK, so the Pope is the image of the first beast Rome according to what you are saying.Revelation 13:11-1711 Then I saw another beast, coming out of the earth. He had two horns like a lamb, but he spoke like a dragon. (Georg interpretation = The Pope looked like a lamb but spoke like a dragon.)12 He exercised all the authority of the first beast on…[Read more]

What was the warning actually for?

Anyway Stu, I am going to leave you with yourself for a while. I hope you don't get too lonely.

Because 45% of our DNA we have in common with a tulip?Did I get it right?Obviously you do not understand a code base and how you can mix and match code to produce different designs. Such is not proof that one design came from another but that it was made by the same programmer who reuses his own code.Even I do that because it is not necessary to…[Read more]

Your a rebel Stu.

And yet you dismiss God because it is not common sense to you.Haven't we already discussed your double standard?I am going to leave you to it Stu.I wish you the best.

Stu 1:1616 And Stu was blind to the creator of the universe, so he chose to believe in nothing in the place of God and he also couldn't grasp how foolish it is to think that nothing can actually make something and something greater than all the intelligence of humanity combined. He even failed to see how rediculous it was to believe that nothing…[Read more]

Quote (Stu @ May 07 2009,20:23)And the most of the IDer’s problems. It was their pin-up example and now it turns out to be just another adaptation in a very long chain of them.I got the impression that he used this example to show in a simple way to simple people how biological machines are cleverly constructed and cannot be pieced together in a…[Read more]

Quote (Stu @ May 07 2009,20:23)What job did the designer/intelligence do? Honestly t8, first you say that human intelligence cannot do anything as complicated as the eye, and then you say that means it was created by an intelligence. That is logically absurd.What is logically absurd is to believe that intelligence cannot compete on a…[Read more]