To all. Feel free to comment on why you think Stu didn't participate in this debate?

    H    E E   A   A  V     V E       EN         N E        E  T      T      

This is what the Trinity makes possible. One error can lead to many more errors.If God has a mother, then does he have an uncle too?Maybe we should worship his uncle?

black

Quote (david @ Feb. 24 2010,17:01)Catholic apologist, you did this before a few times and I think once for this exact topic. I understand your predicament. You have no actual response on topic, no argument against clear scripture. You are as a child who calls names when backed into a corner. My next question is: Don't you think that when you…[Read more]

CA, the truth sets us free.The Church is the body of Christ. It is not a man-made organisation or political entity.It is made up of people filled with God's Spirit.Yes Jesus did once say, “will their be faith when I return”. Well yes there is faith to this day. There are also worldly organisations that are based on tradition that have survived…[Read more]

Another test

I guess you could say that we already knew that your atheist belief was a shallow one based more on bias than reason, so it comes as no surprised that you give this one a no-show. I suppose from now on, when you rant on about there being no God, we can always post a link back here to show that you have no basis for that statement.So I now…[Read more]

Quote (Stu @ Feb. 22 2010,20:34)Yes Blyth was wrong, because the species are not preserved in the way he suggested. He did not say that traits that favour certain environments will be passed on more regularly, he said that any change will be eliminated to preserve the purity of the species.How can he be wrong about preserving the best of a…[Read more]

Stu, you have never given me an answer or rebuttal to my argument because you cannot. Therefore I am right in that you are running away and you do not have any ground with your statement that there is no God.If you truly answered me or gave a worthy rebuttal to my argument as you say, then simply copy it from where you posted it and paste it here.…[Read more]

Actually Stu, Blyth wrote his version of Natural Selection (Artificial Selection) 20 or so years before Darwin. So the point of Evolution was not being discussed at that time as far as I know, and if it was, then how could Darwin lay claim to the theory? Blyth said that Natural Selection was a process that aided in the preservation of species. He…[Read more]

Actually before I open the debate up, if you refuse to disprove my post (the first one) by running away, then I will extend the argument to any other atheist who is willing to stand up and debate it, before opening it up for general comment.

There is nothing wrong with my statement. You could if you had a good rebuttal easily prove the following statement to be wrong:That your argument 'there is no God' is based on bias and is therefore dishonest, unreasonable, and foolish.But you obviously cannot refute what I am saying. OK, so I will give you another chance to step up to the plate…[Read more]

Quote (Stu @ Feb. 21 2010,20:58)Ha Ha?Blyth believed that natural selection only removes bad mutations in order to maintain species unchanged, whereas Darwin explained how as well as natural selection removing the bad ones, advantageous mutations would also be retained and increase in frequency.Blyth was wrong, and Darwin was right.  That's what…[Read more]

Quote (Stu @ Feb. 21 2010,16:37)Do you believe that life begets life?The fossil record does not consist of species that are similar, it is of many very different species.  Pretty much the only thing in common across the species is that DNA codes for proteins that do the rest of the job of building and maintaining a living organism.There are…[Read more]

Quote that you are not in a position to say that there is no God and that deleting one of the 3 options on bias alone is bad science or just plain ignorant. I am not sure why this was not good enough, but I will rephrase/simplify it.Statement that I affirm:That your argument 'there is no God' is based on bias and is therefore dishonest,…[Read more]

Please rephrase your question. I am not sure that I understand it.moot1     Show IPA–adjective1. open to discussion or debate; debatable; doubtful: a moot point.2. of little or no practical value or meaning; purely academic.3. Chiefly Law. not actual; theoretical; hypothetical.–verb (used with object)4. to present or introduce (any point, subj…[Read more]

To prove that you are not in a position to say that there is no God and that deleting one of the 3 options on bias alone is bad science or just plain ignorant. I want you to demonstrate in your defence, which of the options was the first cause for the universe, or admit that you are unqualified or unjustly saying that there is no God. Simple as…[Read more]

Ha ha. I have to let you into a little secret. If Blyth was wrong, then so was Darwin. Darwin took a lot of his ideas. He even said himself that this man helped him more than any other. Both Blyth's belief in God and Darwin's Evolution cater or rely on Natural Selection. If Natural Selection was wrong, then both Blyth and Darwin were wrong. Also,…[Read more]