Wrong Ed. Thomas said the words to JESUS. Are you implying he said “My Lord” to Jesus and “my God” to the Father who was in heaven, but at the same time hiding inside the flesh body of Jesus?Why then doesn't the text say that? Why does the text instead say that Thomas said “my Lord and my God” to JESUS alone?Face it guys, Thomas called Jesus…[Read more]

Frank,Why is it that you are so willing and open with yourself when it comes to making fun of another or insulting someone……………but you clam up when asked to scripturally defend your doctrines in your own words?

Quote (kerwin @ April 14 2012,14:44)Why don't you understand that each of us in one being composed of two parts; a material and a spiritual?And is the material part of us a human being, in and of itself? How about the spiritual part?(The word “parts” should tell you they are indeed PARTS of ONE human being and not TWO separate “men”.)

Quote (Nick Hassan @ April 14 2012,14:15)Hi MB, Not surprising. Thomas saw with spiritual eyes.So then the scripture really should say, “No man can see God………….UNLESS IT IS WITH SPIRITUAL EYES”?Hmmm………………..  And Ed, visions are different.  Was Thomas having a vision at the time he said the words in 20:28?

Quote (Frank4YAHWEH @ April 14 2012,14:18)Mike,You are a laugh in that you continuously get owned on this forum that you co-moderate! Is that what you call RUNNING AWAY from anyone who asks you to stand and defend your flawed doctrine, Frank?  “Owning” them?  

Quote (Ed J @ April 14 2012,14:01)Quote (mikeboll64 @ April 15 2012,06:16)    I don't blame you Frank.  I wouldn't want to bet on a hand of cards knowing that my opponent was holding all four aces.  Hi Mike,Sorry to have to be the one to tell you, but any straight flush beats four aces.God blessEd JYou are right Ed.  I should have been more spec…[Read more]

Quote (Nick Hassan @ April 14 2012,13:31)Hi C,God is invisible.No man has seen God.Hi Nick,The words you just posted to Charles seem to contradict your claim that Thomas was SEEING God in 20:28.

Quote (Nick Hassan @ April 14 2012,13:24)No previous prophet had been so blessed. The Word became flesh and dwelt amongst us.That same baptism in the Spirit is shown to be promised to us in Lk 24. All remain men.The question is not whether the recipients of this spirit remain men, Nick. The question is whether or not the spirit BECAME a man in…[Read more]

Quote (Frank4YAHWEH @ April 14 2012,12:12)Quote (mikeboll64 @ April 15 2012,04:49)Quote (Frank4YAHWEH @ April 14 2012,11:00)Nether you, Nick, t8, or Pierre can change what it is that I believe and sway me to believe as you people do.Well Frank,Let's examine John 17:5 for a minute:So now, Father, glorify me in your own presence with the glory that…[Read more]

Good stuff, Pierre.

Quote (Frank4YAHWEH @ April 14 2012,11:00)Nether you, Nick, t8, or Pierre can change what it is that I believe and sway me to believe as you people do.Well Frank,Let's examine John 17:5 for a minute:So now, Father, glorify me in your own presence with the glory that I had in your presence before the world existed.I accept the words of my Lord as…[Read more]

Quote (Frank4YAHWEH @ April 14 2012,10:40)Quote (Nick Hassan @ April 14 2012,15:47)Hi Frank, You say”I will tell you the same thing that I have told Nick on a number of occasions, if you do not approve of my posts or in the manner in which I present them, then I would ask that you simply do not read my post or respond to them.” Why would you not…[Read more]

Quote (Nick Hassan @ April 13 2012,19:59)Indeed Jammin, Thomas SAW his LORD and his GOD IN HIM.No man has ever seen God, except for the man who came down from heaven.Thomas was calling Jesus his god because Jesus is a god. But Thomas, as a disciple and direct recipient of Jesus' teachings, didn't confuse his god Jesus with Jesus' own God – the…[Read more]

Quote (Nick Hassan @ April 12 2012,20:30)Quote (mikeboll64 @ April 13 2012,13:15)Why is that, Nick?  Did Jesus get such a huge dose of “the word” that it up and changed from a guiding spirit into a human being?Hi MB,He was given the Spirit without measure. That changed a weak man into EMMANUELSo the other prophets, to whom the word of God came,…[Read more]

Quote (Colter @ April 12 2012,21:05)In order to justify their disbelief, they have had to rationalize away so much.But at least when Jesus asked the Pharisees of old how the Messiah could be the son of David if David calls him “my Lord”, they remained silent because they could not answer.The Pharisees on this site don't ever do that.  Like you…[Read more]

Quote (kerwin @ April 12 2012,20:53)Each and every living human being is both an outer man and an inner man.Are you saying that each INDIVIDUAL human being consists of TWO human beings, Kerwin?That seems to be what you are saying, and is most likely the reason I'm not understanding you – because your words are unscriptural and untrue.Do you have…[Read more]

Quote (Nick Hassan @ April 12 2012,20:37)Quote (mikeboll64 @ April 13 2012,13:18)Quote (Nick Hassan @ April 12 2012,18:38)Hi MB,Did Adam not sin?Did Adam enjoy any part of his life without sin?  I haven't.  Nor have you.That's ONE big difference.  Nick, why are we even discussing this?  Because you want to insist that Jesus was just like the res…[Read more]

Quote (Nick Hassan @ April 12 2012,20:35)Hi MB, Scripture tells us three times he is a man. Plenty of witnesses there. So your argument is with scriptureYes Nick,Jesus was a man. I don't argue with that fact, so how is it that you say I'm arguing with scripture? I believe scripture when it says Jesus was existing in the form of God before being…[Read more]

Quote (Nick Hassan @ April 12 2012,20:32)Quote (mikeboll64 @ April 13 2012,13:18)Quote (Nick Hassan @ April 12 2012,18:38)Hi MB,Did Adam not sin?Did Adam enjoy any part of his life without sin?  I haven't.  Nor have you.That's ONE big difference.  Nick, why are we even discussing this?  Because you want to insist that Jesus was just like the res…[Read more]

Quote (kerwin @ April 12 2012,21:22)I understand these quotes; do you?Yes Kerwin,I understand the concept of abstract values.  What I don't understand is why you would take such a concrete issue, such as a spokesman for someone being called his “Word”, and pretend it has some underlying abstract quality when all evidence points to a simple,…[Read more]