Ed, do you have expert testimony to provide that shows how “el” or “elohim” mean “almighty”? YES or NO?If not, can we accept “mighty one” and move on?

Quote (Ed J @ Aug. 02 2012,21:28)Quote (mikeboll64 @ Aug. 03 2012,10:28)Not sure what I mean?       I posted a scripture where the king of Moab sacrificed his son to Chemosh.  After the son was sacrificed, severe wrath fell upon the Israelites, forcing them to flee for home.I asked you which god the king sacrificed his son to.  I asked you whic…[Read more]

Kathi,Check out the Interlinear NT part of this site.  I can't find “Jehovah” in any of the scriptures you posted from the Aramaic Bible.

Quote (Lightenup @ Aug. 01 2012,23:48)No, not always begotten, but begotten before the agesWhat does begotten mean? same as before,To bring forth as an offspring/bornSo Jesus is an offspring of God, but he has existed as long as the God who brought him forth?He was begotten before the ages, but has existed from eternity?Hmmmm…………………

Quote (Lightenup @ Aug. 01 2012,22:28)Mike,you said:Quote Yet I only know of ONE who is named “YHWH”.  You often CLAIM there is another, but I have seen no proof of this claim to date.Allow me to enlighten you then…Lu 2:11 For there is born to you this day a deliverer, who is the Lord Jehovah Messiah, inthe city of DavidAn honest but mistaken…[Read more]

Quote (Ed J @ Aug. 02 2012,16:30)Hi Mike,Deborah was mighty – compared to YHVH being almighty.So then Deborah herself wasn't “almighty”, even though she was an elohim, right?Ed, do you have expert testimony to provide that shows how “el” or “elohim” mean “almighty”?If not, can we accept “mighty one” and move on? (Or is moving on with this…[Read more]

Not sure what I mean? I posted a scripture where the king of Moab sacrificed his son to Chemosh. After the son was sacrificed, severe wrath fell upon the Israelites, forcing them to flee for home.I asked you which god the king sacrificed his son to. I asked you which god brought down wrath upon the Israelites. YOUR ANSWER WAS: They are…[Read more]

Quote (Lightenup @ Aug. 01 2012,23:31)The question is, “do we have the goods?—does the Peshitta Aramaic NT clear up this matter about the divinity of Yeshua (Jesus)?” The answer is, Yes—as you shall see in the following.Btw, I KNEW right from the start that this “Aramaic is the REAL NT” stuff had to be centered around “Jesus is God” people trying…[Read more]

Quote (Lightenup @ Aug. 01 2012,23:31)MarYah—contraction of Mar and Yah, meaning 'Master/Lord Yah'. When the Rabbis translated the Tanakh (Old Testament) to Aramaic—circa 50 BC to 50 AD—they used MarYah in all 6500+ places where YHVH was used in the original Hebrew.Can you show me from an unbiased Aramaic dictionary that “marya” means “the Lord…[Read more]

Quote (limjunus @ Aug. 01 2012,23:57)Thomas, did not address his saying to Jesus, but instead Thomas, is indirectly uttering that words as “MY LORD AND MY GOD! (OMG!) with his extremely sudden emotion…………..So you think it was proper to call Satan and others “god” in NT times, but not Jesus?By calling Jesus “my god”, Thomas wasn't implying…[Read more]

Quote (limjunus @ Aug. 02 2012,00:44)Quote (jammin @ Aug. 02 2012,00:33)limjunus, you did not answer my question.ill repeat, do you believe the words of thomas to jesus? yes or no? Mike, this is how to make a quote box?That's one way, but hitting “quote” on their post will quote EVERYTHING in that post.  If you only want to respond to a…[Read more]

Quote (limjunus @ Aug. 01 2012,23:59) I'm not trying to tell you how to do it, but the rest of us will be able to read your points easier if you put their words in a quote box so they stand out from your words.peace,mike I will do it next time. Thanks Mike You started it right, but forgot to hit the quote button A SECOND time AFTER my words.I see…[Read more]

I wasn't correcting – just joining in with the prayer. I too would love nothing more than for that prayer to be answered.

So then you think that Deborah was the mightiest being of all the beings in existence, Ed?  Plus, I'm STILL waiting for the explanation of the answer you gave to the questions I numbered 1 and 2 for you a couple of days ago.What does it mean “they are not real gods”? Who is the “they”? And how does a “not real” mighty one cause serious wrath to…[Read more]

Quote (terraricca @ Aug. 02 2012,14:33)God give Gene understanding so he can see not with the flesh but with your spirit ,…….through the name of your Holy Servant Jesus Christ, Amen.

Quote (kerwin @ Aug. 02 2012,02:31)Where is you Scriptural proof that a being composed of spirit was transformed into a being composed of flesh?Are you serious?  Phil 2:  He was existing in the form of God……….and was made into the likeness of a human being.John 1:  The Word BECAME FLESH.How many do you need, Kerwin?   Quote (kerwin @ Aug…[Read more]

Quote (kerwin @ Aug. 02 2012,02:20)I bail because it has become a useless conversation.I can see why YOU would consider it “useless”, because YOU'RE on the losing end of it.  But it is not “useless” to me, Kerwin.  I want a clear statement from you that “I think, therefore I am” means “I think, therefore I EXIST”.  If you cannot produce any ev…[Read more]

Ed,Elohim has been explained as a plural form of Eloah or as plural derivative of El.If Elohim be regarded as derived from El, its original meaning would be “the strong one” according to Wellhausen……………..or “the foremost one”, according to Nöldeke………………or “the mighty one”, according to Dillmann……This info is from the…[Read more]

Quote (Wakeup @ Aug. 02 2012,07:16)DEBORAH—-ELOHIM??Judges 5:8 NET © God chose new leaders (elohim), then fighters appeared in the city gates; but, I swear, not a shield or spear could be found, among forty military units in Israel.The footnote says: The Hebrew text reads literally, “He chose God/gods new.”The word used is “elohim”, which is t…[Read more]

Ed,”Elohim” is simply the plural form of “el”, or “eloah”. – nothing more.