jammin,SCRIPTURALLY speaking, are there more than one elohim in existence?

jammin,Although I've already answered that same question from you about 15 times, I will happily answer it yet again – AS SOON AS YOU ACTUALLY ANSWER MINE.What does the word “God” mean in Phil 2:6?

Quote (Ed J @ Aug. 06 2012,19:40)Hi Mike,It sure is hard to get Jammin to answer questions; is it not?God blessEd JEd,It's not just jammin.  It's hard to get straight answers out of many people who realize the straight answer is going to hurt their doctrine.Some people become so comfortable with a lie that they no longer want to accept the truth…[Read more]

jammin,I need an actual ANSWER to my question I've been asking for weeks now.What does the word “God” mean in Phil 2:6?

Quote (jammin @ Aug. 06 2012,19:26)yes bec the translators do not believe that Christ is equal with God.That's because any christ (anointed one) OF God cannot possibly be the God who anointed him, nor can he be equal to the God who anointed him.Therefore, Jesus Christ is NOT equal to HIS OWN God.  He even tells us his God is greater than him.…[Read more]

Quote (Ed J @ Aug. 06 2012,19:30)I'm always serious when it comes to God.Then prove it.  Do you have ANY scholarly information that shows “elohim” DOES NOT mean “mighty one”? In other words, I've shown you that it DOES. Can you refute what I've shown you?

Quote (Ed J @ Aug. 06 2012,19:29)Hi Mike,Was the king of Moab fighting with Israel or against Israel?Against. And he was losing badly UNTIL he sacrificed his son on he wall. THEN wrath came down upon his ENEMIES, the Israelites, causing them to all flee for their homes.

Form of “God”, you say? Okay, I agree. Now, what exactly did Paul MEAN by “God”? Was he saying that Jesus was existing in the form of the One who created all things?

Quote (jammin @ Aug. 06 2012,19:31)do not make questions that cant be read in phil 2.6can you read species there? it says there FORM OR NATURE.if the bible is silent, you must be silentForm or nature of WHO, jammin?

Quote (jammin @ Aug. 06 2012,19:21)before you are using a small g for God now, you are using a small l for LordYes jammin,I don't want anyone out there to think that I think Jesus is the Most High God or the Most High Lord.So, for this context, knowing that Thomas didn't actually think Jesus was God Almighty, I used a small “l” and a small “g”. I…[Read more]

Quote (jammin @ Aug. 06 2012,19:18)do not fool people mike.the verse says form of God or nature GODYes. And I've been asking you what Paul meant by the word “God” in that verse.Was Jesus is the form of a SPECIES known as “Godkind” or something?Or was Jesus in the form of a SINGLE, PARTICULAR BEING known to us as “God”?Which one do YOU think, jammin?

As for the definitions, I'm done playing games Ed. You can either accept the FACT that “el” and “elohim” basically mean “mighty one”, or you can bugger off.This was meant to be a SERIOUS discussion for SERIOUS people. I am truly sorry that none of the others ventured over here to learn some things about SCRIPTURAL truth. But what I'm teaching…[Read more]

Quote (Ed J @ Aug. 05 2012,13:49)Hi Mike,King of Moab sacrificing his sonand great indignation against IsraelI don't see how these are connected – can you explain?Really Ed? I'm about to bail from yet another of our discussions because of your stupid games.Let's see……………………First, the Israelites were kicking serious butt, and not…[Read more]

Yes jammin,The translators of the NWT decided to cap the “G” in “God” ONLY when the word referred to the MOST HIGH God.I agree with that decision.  The Trinitarian translators, on the other hand, idiotically believe that the Son of God IS the very God he is the Son of, and so have chosen to cap the “G” in “God” when it refers to Jesus,…[Read more]

Quote (Lightenup @ Aug. 05 2012,15:24)Begot means to bring forth into existence that which was in existence within when 'begot' refers to birth.And what thing was ever brought forth into existence which had already existed from eternity?Any examples?Kathi, this grows tiresome after a while.  It is clear that you WANT Jesus to have existed from…[Read more]

Quote (Lightenup @ Aug. 05 2012,15:17)Mike,What you see in John 1:18 is THE only begotten God. Not 'a' begotten God.Yes, in SOME mss, we see “the only begotten god”.  (In others, we see “the only begotten son”.)But what do you see in 2 Corintians 4:4?  Do you see “THE god of this world”?  Shall we equate Satan with Jehovah and Jesus too?Quote (L…[Read more]

Quote (Lightenup @ Aug. 05 2012,13:14)Mike,I would say that the rays came from within the sun and were always within the sun till the sun began to shine forth.Can you give me an example from nature where the thing begotten was “ALWAYS” within the thing that begot it?Can you give an example where the one who was begotten wasn't also subject to a…[Read more]

Quote (Lightenup @ Aug. 05 2012,15:06)Gee, off the top of my head,I have shown you this:Quote Here is what page 54 and 55 from the intro of the Hebraic Roots Version says about the placement of the name YHWH and how it is objective and not subjective:The Sacred NameIn the past, sacred name versions of the New Testament have depended largelyon…[Read more]

Quote (Gene Balthrop @ Aug. 06 2012,08:22)While Jesus did Speak “GOD'S WORDS” to us , he was and is never those Words he Spoke.So then in Rev 19:13, the one whose name is called the Word of God is NOT Jesus?

Quote (kerwin @ Aug. 05 2012,23:27)You simply do not believe that satans are beings……………….That is the bottom line, Kerwin.But if Gene would ever directly answer the question I keep re-posting for him, my follow up questions would surely bring him to see the flaw in his understanding.But one can only lead the horse to the water……………..