Quote (Devolution @ Aug. 08 2012,07:05)The New World Translation was produced by the New World Bible Translation Committee, formed in 1947……………………..This discussion isn't about the NWT, Devo. BUT, there is a thread Kangaroo Jack started here called “Blatant Corruption in the NWT”.I have an ongoing challenge on that thread for…[Read more]

Quote (Devolution @ Aug. 08 2012,07:05)In Greek, the word for God was abbreviated, like this:ΘC But the word “who” (which the NIV called “he”) was written like this:OC  The difference between “God” and “who” in Greek was a little line. The amazing thing is, by the Alexandrians removing a line from one letter, they took away the deity of…[Read more]

Quote (limjunus @ Aug. 08 2012,00:41)Quote (mikeboll64 @ Aug. 08 2012,08:24) And I find no scripture that says we too will become Gods.Mike,We will become God's family but not we will become Gods! Right. But apparently the Trinitarians don't think about the fact that some of us will become SONS to God, and BROTHERS to Jesus.Surely that, in and…[Read more]

Eddy?

Quote (journey42 @ Aug. 07 2012,05:41)If the KJV has mistakes, then why would God allow this one to be sent out to us?Why would God release his Word with errors, and with corruption when the scriptures teach us that the written Word of God which we have received, (if indeed you have received it?)  is infallable.Philippians 2:6 CEVChrist was truly…[Read more]

Quote (Gene Balthrop @ Aug. 07 2012,08:39)Satan is a Spirit that work though the power of the Air………….So in Job 1, a “spirit that works through the power of the air” came along with the angels to present itself before God?  And God asked this “spirit that works through the power of the air” where it had come from?Am I on track so far, Gene?

Kerwin,Have you forgotten about the 4th post on page 62?

Quote (Gene Balthrop @ Aug. 07 2012,08:18)Quote (mikeboll64 @ Aug. 07 2012,10:28)So then in Rev 19:13, the one whose name is called the Word of God is NOT Jesus? Jesus is called the word of God because……………He Speaks the words of God to us………..That's right Gene. He is God's main spokesman, and therefore has the title “the Word of…[Read more]

Quote (limjunus @ Aug. 07 2012,04:47)Mike,Jammin is diverting the issue to human nature and not to the nature (attributes) of God.Tell me about it – I have been dealing with jammin on this thread since page ONE! I have addressed his “nature” questions numerous times already.jammin, YES, I have the same nature as my father, which means I am one of…[Read more]

Quote (carmel @ Aug. 06 2012,23:41)Quote (mikeboll64 @ Aug. 07 2012,10:15)My conclusion is that Thomas WAS declaring Jesus to be his lord and his god. Mike,From the Human point of view,SINCE ONLY THROUGH JESUS WE HAVE A GOD, A FATHER , A SAVIOUR, A COMFORTER, AN ETERNAL LIFE, A BODY, A SOUL, A WAY,………AND ON THE LAST DAY WE ALSO BECOME GODS…[Read more]

Quote (kerwin @ Aug. 06 2012,22:59)The lack of “thou art” or an equivilent reveals to us that Thomas was not declaring Jesus to be Lord and God.Kerwin,Do a search of the words “my lord” in the scriptures. See how many times people call others “my lord” without saying the words “thou art”. Surely they are STILL declaring that one to be their lord, right?

Quote (jammin @ Aug. 06 2012,22:25)Quote (journey42 @ Aug. 07 2012,15:09).What version do you suggest I read?of course his one and only NEW WORLD TRANSLATION LOLYes jammin,The NWT is a very good translation.  I actually prefer the NIV wording, and like it the best out of the four translations I've read cover to cover.journey, I suggest using a…[Read more]

Quote (journey42 @ Aug. 06 2012,22:13)MikeIf the word God wasn't used, then what word was?Hi journey,I'm sorry I came on so strong. I was just shocked to see that you would be willing to pick tradition over truth in this matter.The original word was “who”, or “which”. But you can read my post to Ed right above this post if you want to know…[Read more]

Quote (Ed J @ Aug. 06 2012,21:21)Hi Mike,God is in the “Textus Receptus”.God blessEd JYes Ed,And that is likely why the KJV has “God” in 1 Tim 3:16 – because it was from the Textus Receptus that the KJV was translated.But the Textus Receptus was compiled from “six manuscripts, containing between them not quite the whole of the New Testament. The…[Read more]

Quote (journey42 @ Aug. 06 2012,20:26)I fully endorse the KJV and will not change reading it because this group or that group don't like it.And now YOU have just proved that my last post to Ed on this thread is true.  journey, whether you believe the factual evidence or not, it will still remain the factual evidence.I am truly saddened by your…[Read more]

Okay jammin. If you seriously think the Greek word “theos” means “his nature” in Phil 2:6, then there is no reason for us to discuss it any further. Also, you have just proved that my last post to Ed on this thread was the truth.

This thread is not about Phil 2, jammin. It is not about whether or not Christ is God.It is about whether or not Jehovah is LITERALLY the ONLY elohim in existence.Stay on topic because I asked you to.

Ask a question that has to do with the topic of this thread then.

Quote (jammin @ Aug. 06 2012,20:01)i told God is his natureSo the word “God” actually MEANS “his nature”?So Paul was teaching that Jesus was existing in the form of “his nature”? What does that even mean? I'll try to make it a little easier for you:jammin, I think that Paul was referring to the One who created the heavens and the earth when he…[Read more]

Thanks Pierre. I liked it alot too.