Quote (terraricca @ Sep. 11 2012,05:16)Quote (t8 @ Sep. 11 2012,19:40)If your blood was donated, would you come to life in another persons body?If we can be led by the body or spirit, then obviously we are neither. No one is led by the soul perhaps because they are the soul.If flesh and blood cannot inherit the kingdom and blood is the soul, then…[Read more]

Quote (jammin @ Sep. 11 2012,02:15)there is ONE God the only sonthere is ONE God the fatherAnd how many Almighty Gods does “ONE” plus “ONE” equal, jammin?

Quote (Ed J @ Sep. 10 2012,23:05)Quote (mikeboll64 @ Sep. 11 2012,11:54) Since we know that Jesus is also called our Savior, and we know that Jesus is not Jehovah, then it proves the claim in Isaiah 43:11 to be an emphatic statement, and not a literal one.Hi Mike,I thought it instead “proved” that Jesus was God. Trinitarians make that claim, Ed.…[Read more]

Quote (Frank4YAHWEH @ Sep. 10 2012,19:45)Mike,You can also say it as many times as you want when you say that you think “the Father is God Almighty, AND the Son is 'a god'”. This in turn makes you believing in “TWO Gods” instead of ONE Mighty One as Scripture clearly teaches.Again, I'm just following scripture. Is Jesus called a god in…[Read more]

Quote (Frank4YAHWEH @ Sep. 10 2012,19:34)Mike,This also goes to show that you make Yahweh our Heavenly Father and Creator out to be a liar and that what His word actually says can not be trusted without your perversion applied to it!I'm just following scripture, Frank. Tell me how, according to Nehemiah, Jehovah could have SENT many saviors (the…[Read more]

Quote (Frank4YAHWEH @ Sep. 10 2012,18:08)Isaiah 43:11 (King James Version) — I, even I, am the LORD; and beside me there is no saviour.I'm surprised you used that one to illustrate your point, Frank.  Since we know that Jesus is also called our Savior, and we know that Jesus is not Jehovah, then it proves the claim in Isaiah 43:11 to be an…[Read more]

Quote (journey42 @ Sep. 10 2012,02:08)Look Carmel what God is saying……………..Good post, journey.

Quote (jammin @ Sep. 09 2012,23:25)the father is Godthe son is GodYou can say it as many times as you want, jammin.If you think the Father is God Almighty, AND the Son is also God Almighty, then you believe in TWO God Almighties. There's really no way around it, because the word “AND” is a conjunction, and indicates that TWO (or more) are being…[Read more]

Quote (Ed J @ Sep. 09 2012,11:38)Hi Mike,”Our hands have handled, of “The Word” of life;” (1 John 1:1)   This means that they spread the word of God;   it's not about touching Jesus' body.I disagree, Ed.Read the whole passage:1 John 1 1 That which was from the beginning, which we have heard, which we have seen with our eyes, which we have l…[Read more]

Quote (t8 @ Sep. 09 2012,15:57)Quote (Ed J @ Sep. 10 2012,06:43)Um, a, dah, um  –  the part where they can impregnate human women, having children 50% Angelic 50% human.What about God. He impregnated Mary.Ed? Have you considered t8's point?What is your understanding, btw? Do you agree with Kerwin that angels have flesh bodies all the time, but i…[Read more]

Quote (kerwin @ Sep. 10 2012,02:25)This word doesn't usually appear in our free dictionary………….That could be why I've never heard of the word. Of course, it could be omitted from the free dictionary because NOBODY has ever heard of it, and NOBODY ever uses it in day to day conversation. But thanks for the info.

Kerwin,Doesn't your explanation imply that those raised in spiritual bodies WON'T HAVE SOULS, since the “soulish body” is dead and gone?

Quote (Ed J @ Sep. 09 2012,11:24)……and we have seen the Word's glory IN God's only begotten Son.There Ed,I made it big and bold so everyone can see exactly what you think John 1:14 teaches. If it is your understanding, then why play games, drag this discussion out, and act all mysterious about it? If this is truly how you understand 1:14,…[Read more]

Quote (Ed J @ Sep. 09 2012,11:14)Quote (mikeboll64 @ Sep. 10 2012,03:54)Do you wish to use the definition you already posted as SUPPORT of the definition you already posted?  Well, isn't that what you've tried to do?  Ed, I have no times for games.  Please address the points A through 3 from my other post.Oh, and don't play silly games about, “T…[Read more]

Numbers 23:22 NET © The Creator of All Things who is the Father of Jesus brought them out of Egypt.Job 13:8 NET © Will you show him partiality? Will you argue the case for the Creator of All Things who is the Father of Jesus?Job 20:15 NET © The wealth that he consumed he vomits up, the Creator of All Things who is the Father of Jesus will make hi…[Read more]

Ed,If certain words and phrases were ADDED during the course of history, then APPARENTLY, not all copyists were faithfully copying the copies they had.

Okay, I'm getting closer to understanding what you seem to be afraid to just come out an say.Is this it:We have seen the Word's glory IN someone else, who happens to be God's only begotten Son.

Quote (Ed J @ Sep. 08 2012,19:27)Hi Mike,Is there more than one “The Almighty” – yes or no?No Ed. Like I told you, the word “almighty” is an absolute. There can only be one who is the MOST mighty.

Quote (Ed J @ Sep. 08 2012,19:26)Quote (mikeboll64 @ Sep. 08 2012,15:50)Quote (Ed J @ Sep. 06 2012,23:38)Hi Mike,You can turn 'a blind eye' to the facts if you want, but I have shown you that “אל” is interchangeable with “The Almighty” (when referring to YHVH)Ed,(A)I can also claim that “el” is interchangable with “The Creator of All Things who is…[Read more]

Quote (Ed J @ Sep. 08 2012,21:17)Hi Mike,Are you not going on the assumption that the copiest's are faithfully copying the copies they have?Ed,I'm going on the OBVIOUS assumption that if the OLDER mss did NOT have certain words and phrases, and then sometime during the course of history, these words and phrases started appearing in certain mss, it…[Read more]