Proclaimer:  Anyway, it looks like my turn to ask a question. I answered three of your questions. But I will be gracious and ask one so this topic starts with your desired format.

Actually, you STILL haven’t answered either of the first two questions I asked in the other thread.  And the “three” that you FINALLY answered just yesterday were all o…[Read more]

Proclaimer:  If you are saying that the sun was created on the fourth day, then I contest that.

Then you are contesting, not me, but the Bible itself.

Proclaimer:  What happened on the 4th day is that the sun was placed in the vault. So looking up from the earth’s surface, you can see the sun in the sky.

Yes, the sun was placed in the domed, vau…[Read more]

Mike:  PROCLAIMER, IS THERE ANY SCRIPTURAL REASON FOR YOU TO SUSPECT THAT THE DAILY SUN-EARTH CYCLES – OR THE LIGHT-DARK CYCLES THAT PRECEDED THE APPEARANCE OF THE SUN – WERE ANYTHING OTHER THAN 24-HOUR CYCLES DURING THE CREATION PERIOD? IF SO, PLEASE PRESENT THAT SCRIPTURAL EVIDENCE.

 
PROCLAIMER:  WHAT? LOL. DAY AND NIGHT CYCLES BEFORE THE SUN…[Read more]

Mike:  PROCLAIMER, IS THERE ANY SCRIPTURAL REASON FOR YOU TO SUSPECT THAT THE DAILY SUN-EARTH CYCLES – OR THE LIGHT-DARK CYCLES THAT PRECEDED THE APPEARANCE OF THE SUN – WERE ANYTHING OTHER THAN 24-HOUR CYCLES DURING THE CREATION PERIOD? IF SO, PLEASE PRESENT THAT SCRIPTURAL EVIDENCE.

 
PROCLAIMER:  WHAT? LOL. DAY AND NIGHT CYCLES BEFORE THE SUN…[Read more]

Proclaimer:  Hi Mike. It is better to have one outstanding question. That way it is easier to keep track and you don;t have to moan about me not answering your questions because I have missed them.

Well let’s see… I asked if there was any reason for you to suspect that the daily earth-sun cycles were longer than 24 hours during the creation…[Read more]

Proclaimer:  The thing is, if you test something multiple ways and it always comes out as true, then that goes a long way to prove a truth about the physical universe.

Let me give you another couple of lessons…

1. Science is NEVER “settled”.  Even the most accepted conclusions in history are often later proven wrong.  Science is an ONGOING pr…

[Read more]

Proclaimer:  You most certainly deny science. Even the most predictable and repeatable of observations are denied by you.

😅😂🤣  After all that kicking and screaming and finally reluctantly agreeing with what I’ve been saying about science all along, you STILL erroneously think that someone can “deny” what you yourself called the “pursuit of k…[Read more]

Proclaimer: Then God is unscientific.

Correct.  The existence of God is not a part of science.

Proclaimer:  But he is observable through the things he has made. So I cannot see him, but I know he is there.

Correction:  You can observe things that clearly indicate an intelligent designer (like your circle of apples coupled with footprints), but you…[Read more]

Proclaimer:  So let’s look at the Big Bang. It is true that we cannot view the Big Bang directly or indirectly…

Then it’s not a part of science – plain and simple.

Proclaimer:  However, with the map of the background radiation coupled with the evidence for an expanding universe, you only need to play the movie backwards to see that eve…

[Read more]

Proclaimer:  Science means knowledge. But it is more accurately defined as the pursuit and application of knowledge.

Science does not mean knowledge, but you have already corrected yourself by accurately defining science as the PURSUIT of knowledge.  Therefore, if someone claims that somebody else is “denying science”, the person making the c…[Read more]

So amazing to see the hypocrisy.  After denying the existence of the biolabs for weeks, so much incontrovertible evidence had emerged that Victoria Nuland had no choice but to admit their existence – but insist that they were “good labs”.  But then she immediately followed that up by saying she hopes those nasty Russians don’t get their h…[Read more]

https://miamistandard.news/2022/03/19/russia-challenges-us-if-biolab-documents-are-fake-then-ask-head-of-the-dtra-office-at-the-us-embassy-in-kiev-joanna-wintrol-why-she-signed-off-on-them/?amp=1

https://t.me/drawandstrikechannel/34128

https://t.me/drawandstrikechannel/34151

miia,

I don’t know about an ancient prophecy, but here’s a 2008 prophecy from Kim Clement about two presidents…

I was never into politics.  I voted one time for Ross Perot – and never again until 2020.  I didn’t vote for Trump in 2016, because I figured he was just another elite… although I must admit that the w…[Read more]

LU:  …are you wanting me to show you places where the context doesn’t make it clear who is the speaker saying what is quoted?

Not sure I understand the wording there.  I’m asking for other times in the Bible where a NAMED person or party is directly quoted as saying something, and we have to pick and choose between two or more choices said the…[Read more]

LU:  You wrote that as a fact, do you mean to write that as an opinion? If as a fact, prove it to be a fact, otherwise re-write it as an opinion…

Funny you should say that, since I truly and honestly had “IMO” after the statement at first – but then removed it because there is no doubt in my mind that you exactly what I was asking for, and that…[Read more]

LU: <span style=”color: #ff0000;”>Deuteronomy 32:6…  Is this the way you repay Yahweh (the God of gods and the Lord of lords), you foolish and unwise people? Is he (the God of gods and the Lord of lords) not your Father, your Creator, who made you and formed you?</span>

Are you making the claim that “Yahweh the Son”  is also our heavenly Fathe…[Read more]

LU: Who is the speaker and to whom is he/she speaking to and defend your answer scripturally:

1On many past occasions and in many different ways, God spoke to our fathers through the prophets. 2But in these last days He has spoken to us by His Son, whom He appointed heir of all things, and through whom He made the universe.

Kathi, you know full…[Read more]