Quote (terraricca @ Jan. 13 2013,18:55)Rev 12:1 A great and wondrous sign appeared in heaven: a woman clothed with the sun, with the moon under her feet and a crown of twelve stars on her head. 1)so the woman, is to me a combination of Gods servant in heaven and on earth………..Rev 12:2 She was pregnant and cried out in pain as she was about to…[Read more]

Quote (Ed J @ Jan. 14 2013,15:55)Hey Guys,When you post a bunch of Scripture that is suppose to relate to a topic, you should say exactly how each verse lines-up to what you believe.Give it a try guys, and you will be surprised how much it will help us all!I agree with Ed.  Pierre did a fine job earlier in this thread.  He listed only a few v…[Read more]

Quote (Kangaroo Jack @ Jan. 17 2013,09:26)……to Him who sits on the throne,AND to the Lamb……Hi Jack,The word “AND”, that you've capped, bolded and underlined, teaches us that “Him who sits on the throne” is one, and “the Lamb” is someone else.It is God Almighty who sits on the throne, Jack.  The Lamb OF God Almighty is Jesus, who is also…[Read more]

Quote (Ed J @ Jan. 17 2013,04:26)Hi Mike,1.  Why this is so hard for you to believe?2.  Has not part of you became your son too?3.  What I WILL say is: something that WAS Mike became someone who IS NOT Mike any longer.1.  Because it's asinine.2.  Absolutely not.  I am just as much “Mike” now as I was before my son was begotten.  There is no part o…[Read more]

Quote (Ed J @ Jan. 16 2013,21:27)GOD was manifest in the flesh. (see John 1:14)The original Greek words were “HE was manifest in the flesh”.  That word “HE” was later changed by a scribe to “God”.  Today, we know this is the case, which is why no recent Bible has “God was manifest” anymore.Ed, most recent Bibles are produced by TRINITARIANS.  …[Read more]

Quote (carmel @ Jan. 17 2013,14:58)“God is not a man, that he should lie; SO HE SENT HIS OWN SON TO ESTABLISH THE TRUTH, MAN/GODCharles, Why don't you believe the words you yourself just wrote?God is not a man, SO HE SENT HIS OWN SON.Get it? God Himself did not send God Himself. He sent HIS SON.Jesus is the SON OF God – not God Himself.I also…[Read more]

Quote (2besee @ Jan. 17 2013,16:22)I will take the time to read through your posts properly though Mike (later on) and ,see what i can 'see'. k?Hi 2B,Just answer the 8 questions from my recent post when you get the time.They are only one-word answers, and so it shouldn't take too much of your time.To answer your question, “NO”, I haven't yet been…[Read more]

Quote (kerwin @ Jan. 17 2013,13:43)I am uncertain if “came by” and “full of” mean the same thing.Actually Kerwin, this is a fairly simple connection.14  The Word came from the Father, full of grace and truth.16  From the fullness of his grace we have all received blessings.17  Grace and truth came by Jesus Christ.Why can't you see what is so ob…[Read more]

Ed,I don't have the foggiest how your last post addresses my last post.

Psalm 102:27 NIV © But you remain the same, and your years will never end.

Quote (jammin @ Jan. 15 2013,18:48)did you read my explanation about mal 3.6?James 1:17 NET © All generous giving and every perfect gift is from above, coming down from the Father of lights, with whom there is no variation or the slightest hint of change.

Quote (kerwin @ Jan. 16 2013,18:00)Mike,1) John wrote of both the Word and the Word of life.John wrote of “the Word of God” in Revelation 19.  From the context, we can be sure that the person named “the Word of God” is Jesus Christ.John later wrote of “the Word ” in his gospel.  Again, from the context, we can be sure that the person named “the W…[Read more]

John 1:14 The Word became flesh and made his dwelling among us. We have seen his glory, the glory of the only begotten,who came from the Father, full of grace and truth.Kerwin and 2B, let's discuss this one scripture for a minute.  We'll work it back to front:……full of grace and truth.1.  Who was full of “grace” and “truth”?  (John 1:17 mi…[Read more]

Quote (kerwin @ Jan. 15 2013,20:00)Mike,You keep saying with your mouth that the Word became flesh but you do not even believe in your heart that the Word literally became flesh.Instead you are redefining both the Word and flesh in order to make a messenger transform into a human being.Those two statements are in opposition to each other, Kerwin.…[Read more]

Quote (Ed J @ Jan. 16 2013,17:20)Hi Kerwin, The “AKJV Bible” is a word for word translation from the original texts.Not only was the KJV NOT translated from the “originals”, it wasn't even translated from very ancient mss.The newer English Bibles are translated from much older mss than the KJV was.  In fact, parts of the KJV were BACK-translated…[Read more]

Quote (kerwin @ Jan. 16 2013,04:19)That supper is in the future and so the event being described is in the future.Revelation 19:13 And he was clothed with a vesture dipped in blood: and his name is called The Word of God.I understand the point you are trying to make, Kerwin, but it is not necessarily the way you think it is.For example, Jehovah…[Read more]

Quote (jammin @ Jan. 15 2013,18:39)you are repeating again your non sense words.Which of my answers was wrong, jammin?

Quote (Ed J @ Jan. 15 2013,02:05) Quote (mikeboll64 @ Jan. 15 2013,11:36)Are you saying that something that WAS God became someone who WASN'T God any longer?Hi Mike,No, what I'm saying is: Part of God became human.……HE also (God) himself likewise took part of the same……(Heb 2:14)That doesn't say “part of God”, does it?Quote (Ed J @ Jan. 15…[Read more]

Quote (jammin @ Jan. 14 2013,23:52)yes. the son called his father God. but the father also called his son as God.You're missing the point again, jammin.  (Perhaps on purpose?)The Son said that the Father was his God and our God.1.  How many Gods do you suppose the Son has, jammin?  ONE2.  And who is that one God, jammin?  The Father3.  And how m…[Read more]

Quote (Ed J @ Jan. 14 2013,22:30)Quote (mikeboll64 @ Jan. 15 2013,11:30)Jesus will never return in the flesh, Ed.  He became a life-giving spirit.  He is flesh no more – nor will he ever be again.Hi Mike,Substitute the word “PHYSICAL” for 'flesh'.Okay.I'll need a scriptural context for this one.