Quote (2besee @ Oct. 24 2013,14:55)Mike,I continued on to the NEXT part of the sentence.Please click on each link to see it is a different page I am on.IN the beginning was the word, the word was with God, and God was IN (en) the word.http://biblehub.com/text/john/1-4.htmThat is not nonsense! It fits in perfectly. The word is not “WITH”, the word…[Read more]

Quote (942767 @ Oct. 24 2013,08:46)Hi Mike:You ask:Quote Marty, WHOSE name is called “The Word of God” in Rev 19:13? I have already discussed this with you, and what it means.  The answer is “Jesus”, Marty. That is the answer to my question. Jesus is the one whose name is called “The Word of God”.(BTW, Jesus is also the one who is called by…[Read more]

Quote (Wakeup @ Oct. 24 2013,08:09)Carmel.Please go back to the Holy bible.wakeup.I was thinking the same thing, Wakeup. I have no idea where he finds these teachings. I've read the Bible 5 times now, and haven't ever read the stuff Charles preaches.

Quote (Wakeup @ Oct. 24 2013,16:51)Hi you all.Mike/Terra/Kerwin/Gene/Marty/Carmel.And whomsoever.Unravel this scripture before you make any commentsabout the Word; and God.Isaiah 44:6   Thus saith the **LORD the King of Israel**, **and his redeemer the LORD of hosts**;** I am the first, and I am the last**; **and beside me there is no God**.…[Read more]

Quote (Gene Balthrop @ Oct. 24 2013,15:16)Quote (mikeboll @ 64)1.  Jesus is IN God.  (John 17:21)2.  Jesus IS God.Gene, do both of these statements mean the same thing?  YES or NO?So, knowing now how badly that one little word can twist a scriptural teaching, will you continue to ADD it to John 1:14?  Or will you find a way to understand what John…[Read more]

Quote (Wakeup @ Oct. 24 2013,07:56)Quote (mikeboll64 @ Oct. 24 2013,12:13)Quote (Wakeup @ Oct. 23 2013,03:15)3. THE WORD OF GOD IS   **NOT**   GOD. BUT THE WORD OF GOD.(NO NAME). JUST THE WORD OF GOD.Amen, Wakeup!  You are correct that the Word is NOT God.  And we know that something that “was God” could never become a different thing that is “no…[Read more]

Quote (kerwin @ Oct. 23 2013,19:23)Mike and Carmel,Did light exist before God created it?I say no but Mike and Carmel say yes.So according to you two light has always existed and God did not really create it.You both can do better than that.1 John 1:5 This is the message we have heard from him and declare to you: God is light; in him there is no…[Read more]

Quote (kerwin @ Oct. 23 2013,19:06)Quote (mikeboll64 @ Oct. 23 2013,05:21)Quote (kerwin @ Oct. 22 2013,17:07)Quote (mikeboll64 @ Oct. 23 2013,04:58)Quote (2besee @ Oct. 22 2013,02:28)I ask you this:Is Mike's 'mind', and Mike's 'word', and Mike's 'spirit' other separate beings – or is Mike “one”?And I believe I answered it already with an analogy…[Read more]

Quote (2besee @ Oct. 23 2013,19:05)As to your other question: I seriously can't get my head around your question enough to answer.  See Kerwin?  2B is learning from Ed J too.  2B, the answer is:  NO!  The Father God Almighty cannot possibly be WITH the Father God Almighty.And since the Word was WITH the Father God Almighty in the beginning, ther…[Read more]

Quote (2besee @ Oct. 23 2013,19:05)Mike no so carry on to the next pageHe was IN (en) the beginning with God.That IS the same word exactly.http://biblehub.com/text/john/1-2.htmI don't have time right now to look into it properly, but please do.As to your other question: I seriously can't get my head around your question enough to answer.So how can…[Read more]

Oh, and you also never answered this question from before:Kerwin, do you believe Satan's angels are spirit beings, but God's angels consist of flesh? YES or NO?

Kerwin,Please address this part of a recent post from me to you:And what about Judges 13:16, that they listed?  Does the fact that the angel who came to Manoah REFUSED to eat mean he WAS a “spirit”, and therefore NOT made of “spiritual flesh”?This is why I say you're adding your own imaginations into the scriptures, Kerwin.  Surely I couldn't u…[Read more]

Quote (kerwin @ Oct. 22 2013,23:07)So these net scholars are saying that “they did not believe” does not mean “they did not believe” because of their reason for not believing. That does not sound like a credible claim by whoever voices it as I do not see God accepting that excuse for not believing.They still could not believe it BECAUSE OF THEIR…[Read more]

Quote (Gene Balthrop @ Oct. 23 2013,09:26)Quote (mikeboll64 @ Oct. 23 2013,11:59)Quote (Gene Balthrop @ Oct. 22 2013,13:48)Quote (mikeboll64 @ Oct. 22 2013,10:59)Gene,Did the Father God Almighty Himself become flesh and dwell on earth with the glory of His own only begotten Son?  YES or NO?No……….And yet the Word DID become flesh and dwell…[Read more]

Quote (Wakeup @ Oct. 23 2013,03:15)3. THE WORD OF GOD IS   **NOT**   GOD. BUT THE WORD OF GOD.(NO NAME). JUST THE WORD OF GOD.Amen, Wakeup!  You are correct that the Word is NOT God.  And we know that something that “was God” could never become a different thing that is “not God”, right?So that means the Word was NEVER God.And THAT means the tra…[Read more]

Quote (Wakeup @ Oct. 23 2013,04:48)The fact is that John did not say that God is with himself.This is your interpretation of John's'statement.Wakeup,If the Word actually WAS God Almighty Himself, as YOU claim, then there is no choice but for John to have said God Almighty Himself was WITH God Almighty Himself.Get it?  YOU say:  The Word = God A…[Read more]

Quote (2besee @ Oct. 23 2013,18:19)Quote (mikeboll64 @ Oct. 24 2013,12:40)And if the Word was WITH the Father God Almighty, then can the Word also BE the Father God Almighty?In other words, can the Father God Almighty be WITH the Father God Almighty?  YES or NO?Please don't tell me this point is “irrelevant”.  Either ANSWER it, or don't post to m…[Read more]

Quote (2besee @ Oct. 23 2013,18:14)All,The same word “IN” (en) is used:IN the beginning was the word, the word was with God, and God was IN the word.http://biblehub.com/text/john/1-1.htmNOT “God was the word” – but, “God was in the word”.That might solve alot of problems.While the English transliteration of those words might look the same to us,…[Read more]

Daniel,I couldn't care less about whether or not the JWs used to say “worship” in reference to Jesus.  What I KNOW is that 1 Chronicles 29:20 said “worship the king” in the old KJV.But the NEW KJV says, “bowed their heads and prostrated themselves before the LORD and the king”.And the vast majority of current English translations say something…[Read more]

Quote (Lightenup @ Oct. 22 2013,20:26)Quote (mikeboll64 @ Oct. 22 2013,17:51)Funny you should mention Peter, who Jesus himself named “rock”.  Perhaps Peter, himself a “rock”, is also a part of the Godhead unity, and that's why he was able to explain so much to us.  You already have Jehovah the Father and Jehovah the Son……….. perhaps Peter c…[Read more]