Quote (terraricca @ Feb. 05 2014,17:33)Quote (mikeboll64 @ Feb. 06 2014,05:21)Quote (terraricca @ Feb. 04 2014,14:52)to me God knows and let people foresee or give them foreknowledge of what he knows will happen now or in the future ……..Look at your own words, Pierre.In Revelation, John SAW those future things.  And to SEE future events is…[Read more]

Here's the next one, Wakeup:Genesis 2:5 KJV And every plant of the field before it was in the earth, and every herb of the field before it grew: for the LORD God had not caused it to rain upon the earth, and there was not a man to till the ground.Here's the Hebrew of the same verse:אֶת־הָֽאֲדָמָֽה׃ יִצְמָח כִּי לֹא הִמְטִיר  יְהוָה    אֱלֹהִים &#…[Read more]

Quote (Wakeup @ Feb. 06 2014,01:35)MikeB.As I have asked you before.Have you seen the original or are you just going by word?I haven't read the entire OT in the Hebrew language, Wakeup.But let's count them together, okay?Exodus 6:3 KJV And I appeared unto Abraham, unto Isaac, and unto Jacob, by the name of God Almighty, but by my name JEHOVAH was…[Read more]

Hi Kerwin,I'm not sure how quoting the hard to understand English of the KJV changes anything, but:…….it doth not yet appear what we shall be: but we know that, when he shall appear, we shall be like him; for we shall see him as he is.These are the things we can take away from the above words:1. We don't yet know what WE will be.2. We don't…[Read more]

Quote (terraricca @ Feb. 04 2014,14:52)to me God knows and let people foresee or give them foreknowledge of what he knows will happen now or in the future ……..Look at your own words, Pierre.In Revelation, John SAW those future things. And to SEE future events is called “foreseeing”.How could God allow JOHN to “foresee” events that He Himself…[Read more]

Quote (Wakeup @ Feb. 04 2014,14:56)When Jesus said: seek and you shall find.Does it not make sense to say that He also will provide?God has provided, Wakeup. He provided us with the information that we're constantly digging up. And He provided us with common sense to understand that information.Why you choose to use only SOME of the information…[Read more]

Okay Pierre,I'll TRY to clear the blur for you.  In Revelation, was John describing things to us that he was actually SEEING?  Revelation 111 “Write on a scroll what you see and send it to the seven churches………12 I turned around to see the voice that was speaking to me. And when I turned I saw seven golden lampstands………

Quote (Wakeup @ Feb. 05 2014,01:26)Is jesus God? just a spokesman?Jesus is indeed God's main spokesman.However, the Son, Priest, Prophet, Lamb, Servant, Spokesman and Messiah OF God is not actually the God he is all those things OF.Nor did he ever “used to be” that God.Wakeup, you are taking this discussion off point again. I won't have that. So…[Read more]

Quote (Wakeup @ Feb. 05 2014,01:21)It is time that you also start answering questions.No, no, no……….. I already fell for that crap before.  I've answered a hundred of your UNRELATED questions, and still get no DIRECT answers from you.Quote (Wakeup @ Feb. 05 2014,01:21)What is this about first package, and second package?YOU are the one who…[Read more]

Quote (kerwin @ Feb. 04 2014,16:46)Yes, I believe he was in his spiritual body after his resurrection and therefore during the forty days just previous to his ascension to heaven.According to your belief, John and the others all saw Jesus in his new spiritual body, right?Why then did John say this:1 John 3:2 …….what we will be has not yet been…[Read more]

Quote (terraricca @ Feb. 05 2014,13:05)…….they told me “I AM BORN CATHOLIC AND WILL DIE ONE ,I DO NOT CARE FOR THE REST DON'T BOTHER ME ANY MORE”, so I stopped talking to them….Many people are set in their ways – right or wrong.

Quote (Wakeup @ Feb. 04 2014,15:14)MikeB.You have 7000 Jehovah's in your bible well good luck on you.I am not against that.You're not?    Because it seems to me you've accused the JWs of ADDING that divine name into the scriptures, as a promotional tool, or whatever.You have DERIDED the JWs for having that name in their Bible so many times.I h…[Read more]

Wakeup,The KJV translates Strong's H3068 in the following manner: LORD (6,510x)GOD (4x)JEHOVAH (4x)variant (1x).It is the same Hebrew word each time.  And it is the same word that God used in Exodus 3:14, when He told Moses His name, and said it would be His name forever, as a memorial for all generations.But anyway, you can see for yourself the…[Read more]

Quote (journey42 @ Feb. 04 2014,18:20)Mike,I just spent a whole hour answering you, and lost everything again.  Is someone on your end cutting me off?  Yes journey,T8 and myself have been card carrying members of the KJV Haters Club for years now.  And as a part of that organization, we are entitle to certain perks.  One of those perks inv…[Read more]

Quote (Wakeup @ Feb. 04 2014,15:55)5.This being was Gods own thoughts,in himself;Wakeup,Repeating the same confusing stuff over and over is NOT having a true discussion. I'm asking VALID questions ABOUT the things you've been repeating over and over – and I believe I deserve some DIRECT answers to those questions.Face it, if you can't…[Read more]

Quote (terraricca @ Feb. 04 2014,13:12)now does God at any point as to go and see into the future to see what he already knowPierre,God showed John VIVID DETAILS of what was going to happen in the future, right?How could God show those details to John if God can't even see those details in His own mind?If God couldn't “foresee” those events, then…[Read more]

If it's not in the KJV, then it doesn't exist – according to Wakeup.

Yes Pierre.

Actually Wakeup,The real FACT of the matter is that the KJV scholars shouldn't get to CHOOSE when they will translate a certain Hebrew word as “Jehovah”, and when they will translate it as “The LORD”.They translated God's divine personal name as “Jehovah” in Ex 6:3, Psalm 83:18, Isaiah 12:2 and Isaiah 26:4.And in those four verses, they did good.…[Read more]

So your DIRECT answers to my points are:1. The reason the KJV was the only Bible NOT written by antichrists is because God personally chose that translation to be perfect.2. No Mike, I can't show you any “antichrist” verses in any of the newer translations, but I will just continue to make that unwarranted claim anyway.Hmmmm………..