Quote (Wakeup @ Feb. 10 2014,17:33)I'll see you in some other place Mike.Not if I see you first!

Quote (kerwin @ Feb. 09 2014,10:18)Quote (kerwin @ Sep. 03 2013,00:07)It is written:Matthew 4:4Authorized (King James) Version (AKJV)4 But he answered and said, It is written, Man shall not live by bread alone, but by every word that proceedeth out of the mouth of God.Some believe:Matthew 4:4An interpretation of the Authorized (King James) Version…[Read more]

Quote (Wakeup @ Feb. 09 2014,14:33)Mike B.All that work just trying to proof that the kjv is corrupted.There must be a very good reason why those scholars have replaced the name of God to Lord. Find the reason why.The “reason” isn't important, Wakeup. I'm just happy that you have finally come to know that the KJV people DID substitute the divine…[Read more]

Quote (Wakeup @ Feb. 10 2014,16:08)Lamentations 2:17 The LORD hath done that which he had devised; he hath fulfilled his word that he had commanded in the days of old……….(Wakeup, the scripture you posted is another of the many times that God's “word” does NOT refer to a living breathing being. You can add that one to the list I made for…[Read more]

Quote (journey42 @ Feb. 10 2014,07:54) Quote (mikeboll @ 64)If you personally prefer “only begotten son” in this verse, I can't prove you wrong.It harmonises, with all the other scriptures.It harmonizes with JOHN'S often used phrase, “only begotten Son”.  John is the only one who called Jesus by that name…… and he did it quite a few times.And…[Read more]

Quote (journey42 @ Feb. 10 2014,07:54)I hear you Mike, but this all sounds like personal interpretation to me.It's not interpretation in this case, journey.  The FACT of the matter is that some old Greek mss have “son” in 1:18, and other ones (the OLDEST ones) have “god” in that verse.The KJV chose the “son” ms, and most newer English Bibles opt…[Read more]

Quote (journey42 @ Feb. 10 2014,07:54)If his name is so important, and the NEW TESTAMENT, is what is preached to the gentiles, then why was the name Jehovah not mentioned once in there.  7000 times in the OLD TESTAMENT, and not once in the NT? According to Gesenius' Hebrew Chaldee Lexicon, “the Hebrews….. either mislead by a false…[Read more]

Quote (Wakeup @ Feb. 09 2014,23:59)Mike B.Just read rev.19.He; is a BEING coming,and he is called the WORD of God.He is not just breath.Or is He?wakeup.Yes Wakeup,Revelation 19:13 is one of those few times that a living breathing being is METAPHORICALLY called “the Word of God”.  He is called such because he is God's main SPOKESMAN – not because…[Read more]

Quote (carmel @ Feb. 10 2014,09:11)Quote (Wakeup @ Feb. 10 2014,16:52)Not all humans have the Holy spirit, this is in scripture.Wakeup,THERE IS NOTHING IN THOSE SCRIPTURES YOU POSTED WHICH SAY THAT THE HOLY SPIRIT IS NOT IN ALL HUMANS!AGAIN YOU SHOOT WORDS:THE VERY FIRST ONE CONTRADICTS YOU!  READ:John 14:16   And I will pray the Father, and he s…[Read more]

Kerwin,You are either missing or avoiding the only point that needed to be made:John DID know that he would be like Jesus is.But John DIDN'T know exactly what he would be, because he had yet to see Jesus as he is.That should be more than enough to tell you that John hadn't yet seen Jesus “as he is” at the time he wrote those words.  If he had,…[Read more]

Are you saying a new spiritual flesh body is too brilliant to be seen by human eyes? If so, how did they all see Jesus in his resurrection body?

Quote (942767 @ Feb. 10 2014,10:09)……it is true that someone may not come to God the instance that he hears the gospel, but may come at a later time in his life.Luke 136 “A man had a fig tree growing in his vineyard, and he went to look for fruit on it but did not find any. 7 So he said to the man who took care of the vineyard, ‘For three yea…[Read more]

Quote (Gene Balthrop @ Feb. 09 2014,13:11)Quote (mikeboll64 @ Feb. 10 2014,04:13)Gene,I only want to know if the man who raped the little boy did so because of his own free will, or if God DESTINED him to rape that little boy.Which one?MIke………No, He did it by his Carnal Born human mind that Natural Mind set is what brought his will into…[Read more]

Okay Kerwin,Forget “creature” for a minute. Do you believe this “Word of God” was a BEING, or an ENTITY other than God Himself before all things were created through it/him?

Quote (Wakeup @ Feb. 09 2014,14:16)Psalms 33:6   ***By the word of the LORD***  were the heavens made; and all the host of them by the  breath of his mouth.And that *WORD* was walking on earth clocked in flesh.Wakeup,Like Charles told you in the “Word” thread, you must not confuse Jesus as “The Word” with literal words from God's mouth.I mean, lo…[Read more]

Hi journey,I don't understand the last line of your post, or why that line is even there.  But you almost answered your own question about John 1:18 when you posted all those other times John wrote the phrase, “only begotten Son”.Here is some information about why some Bibles have “only begotten SON” in 1:18, and others have “only begotten GOD”.…[Read more]

Quote (kerwin @ Feb. 09 2014,19:08)Mike,Jesus was transfigured while having a flesh body.  Peter offered to set up tents for Jesus, Moses, and Elijah.  His actions revealed he believed they were not spirits.And it is also written in that passage that Peter was basically in shock, and didn't know what he was doing, or talking about.Did the g…[Read more]

Quote (kerwin @ Feb. 09 2014,18:49)Mike,I tend to see ” it doth not yet appear what we shall be” as speaking of righteousness.  I am attempting to adjust that viewpoint.You're attempting to “adjust” what the scriptures say so that you can force them into what you already believe. This is your norm. But you're not really thinking straight…[Read more]

Quote (kerwin @ Feb. 09 2014,18:40)Mike,Quote In that verse, John made it clear that he didn't yet know what he would be, but only that he would be like Jesus.So you believe Paul did know while John did not even though they both taught the gospel.Paul and John both knew they would end up with a spiritual body – one that could blind a normal human…[Read more]

Your teaching is that this “utterance” of God was NOT actually God Almighty Himself, but a DIFFERENT entity that was WITH God before God created all things, INCLUDING THE HEAVENS, through him/it.Is that part correct?