Quote (Wakeup @ May 08 2014,02:51)Quote (mikeboll64 @ May 08 2014,12:39)Quote (journey42 @ May 05 2014,21:04)So yes, the man Jesus Christ can never be the Father.And who is Isaiah 9:6 about, journey?Isn't it about “the man, Jesus Christ”?So if the person 9:6 is actually about “can never be the Father” – then why on earth would 9:6 say he would be…[Read more]

That is the hope.

Kerwin, While the angel was already visible to the donkey, he was still invisible to Balaam.While the chariots of fire were already visible to Elisha, they remained invisible to his servant.Invisible to one being doesn't necessarily mean invisible to another being.

Quote (Nick Hassan @ May 08 2014,17:42)Hi WU, No he had to fulfil the sign of Jonah.the Jews had to be shown this fulfilment-acts 2] We in Christ are different in that we are resurrected into a new bodyThat's right, Nick.Jesus was an EXCEPTION to the “rule” Paul taught in 1 Cor 15. Nobody else who is ever resurrected will have to first spend 40…[Read more]

Quote (kerwin @ May 08 2014,15:13)Mike has a doctrine that can be taught by reason even though I have pointed out to him it is not based on the word of God.What? ! ? ! Every single thing I preach on this site is based on the teachings found in the Bible.

Quote (jammin @ May 08 2014,11:08)Quote (Wakeup @ May 08 2014,20:26)Jammin.1.Is He God or is He the only Son?2.Was God crucified or was it His Son?3.Did God gave His Son, or Himself?4.Did your God die, and was buried for three days?5,Who did resurrect Him?   If you say God did resurrect Himself; then He did not     really die. He was al…[Read more]

Quote (carmel @ May 08 2014,00:37)Quote (mikeboll64 @ May 02 2014,10:34)Does the fact that the fire is ETERNAL mean that fire has existed FROM eternity?  YES or NO?Mike,YES! FIRE IS ETERNAL AS GOD IS!I strongly disagree with that, Charles. If God created ALL THINGS, then that would include “fire” too.But, just to prove my point another way:John…[Read more]

Yeah, I was thinking of that very scripture when I was making that last post to you.Neither Paul nor Jesus were speaking in a LITERAL manner. Of course we all know that Satan is not LITERALLY the father of any of us.It is metaphorical speech, and doesn't change what you said in the first line of your post.

Quote (Nick Hassan @ May 08 2014,15:29)Hi, Rom 814 For as many as are led by the Spirit of God, they are the sons of God.Angelic or human these are the sons of GodBut those who are not led by Spirit don't stop being “sons of God”, Nick.The vast majority of the nation of Israel was not led by Spirit, and rebelled against God more often than they…[Read more]

Quote (kerwin @ May 08 2014,15:04)Genesis 6:2 is vague about what the term son of God means.  That is irrelevant to what 1 Enoch teaches since it obviously teaches what you believe and not what I believe on this issue.  I tend to agree since that is what the context looks like it means……….You are correct that the context supports angels w…[Read more]

Quote (mikeboll64 @ May 05 2014,20:17)Quote (4Thomas @ May 04 2014,19:39)Give me any single direct question, one at a time. Give me your BEST question and it will be clear as we go through YOUR questions one by one. WHAT was THE Son before he took flesh is the answer I want FROM you.Okay.  Here's my first question:Mark 1318 Pray that this will…[Read more]

Daniel,I didn't bother to read the rest of that first post, or any of the second one.You have challenged me to a “question for question” debate. I have directly answered YOUR one question, and remain waiting for the DIRECT answer to my first question.If the answer is in the middle of a mile long sermon, I will not find it. You need to make a…[Read more]

Quote (4Thomas @ May 06 2014,00:13)So you say that the Father is ALONE the creator and then you say he didn't create WITHOUT the Son.You can't say that the Father created by a literal word ALONE because this excludes the Son, do you understand this?Daniel,Please just listen for 10 SECONDS………..Jehovah the Father created you ALONE.  He is the…[Read more]

Quote (kerwin @ May 07 2014,19:43)Then there is “lusted in the blood of men” which according to my limited knowledge means they like to kill humans.I think it means that these angels lusted after fleshy human woman. This is supported by Genesis 6:2.

Quote (Nick Hassan @ May 07 2014,19:39)Hi GB, When the sons of God are revealed perhaps they will be different and be able to see God? Flesh eyes cannot see anything invisible.“Invisible” is a relative statement anyway, right?What might be “invisible” to one being isn't necessarily “invisible” to another.When it is said that God is “invisible”,…[Read more]

Quote (Gene Balthrop @ May 07 2014,19:35)Wakeup ………Please show one single scripture that say a person can see spirit.John 6:46No one has seen the Father except the one who is from God; only he has seen the Father.Matthew 18:10See that you do not despise one of these little ones. For I tell you that their angels in heaven always see the face…[Read more]

Quote (kerwin @ May 07 2014,10:00)Wakeup,It is written that Moses saw God face to face………Kerwin,It is written that God SPOKE TO Moses “face to face”.Deuteronomy 5:4 The LORD spoke to you face to face out of the fire on the mountain.Deuteronomy 4:12 Then the LORD spoke to you out of the fire. You heard the sound of words but saw no form;…[Read more]

Quote (Gene Balthrop @ May 07 2014,06:05)God is SPIRIT and you can not see Spirit……Correction: HUMAN BEINGS cannot see spirit with their HUMAN EYEBALLS.God has, on occasion, opened the eyes of human beings so that they could see spirit beings. But without God's direct intervention, a human eyeball cannot see spirit.On the other hand, spirits…[Read more]

Quote (kerwin @ May 06 2014,21:47)Quote (mikeboll64 @ May 07 2014,07:40)Moses asked to see God's glory…. not His form.Mike,Yes, that is my point.  Moses did not see God's form.  No Prophet or other human being saw his form.  That would do away with most or all of your evidence that God has a form.Correction:  No human being has seen God's for…[Read more]

Quote (Nick Hassan @ May 06 2014,20:53)Hi MB, Yes none say that. There are two creationsCould men have misconstrued which is being spoken of?Nick,Don't forget that the words Paul actually wrote were, “the firstborn of EVERY creature”. You seem to want to apply a different teaching about “new creations” back into Colossians 1:15 – which wasn't…[Read more]