mikeboll64 replied to the topic John 1:1 in the forum Scriptural Teachings 12 years ago
Quote (kerwin @ June 26 2014,12:06)Jammin,Since what you say isn't in Scripture, then perhaps you should make one that has that written in it.Oh no he didn't!
jammin, did Kerwin just throw the old “Make your own Bible” thing right back at you? 
mikeboll64 replied to the topic John 1:1 in the forum Scriptural Teachings 12 years ago
Quote (jammin @ June 25 2014,22:31)there is no problem because the father is all powerful and so his son.Yet there IS a problem, because I keep showing you SCRIPTURES that make it clear Jesus ISN'T Almighty – yet you keep claiming he is anyway.Quote (jammin @ June 25 2014,22:31)if Christ is not really God by nature,he should have told to the jews…[Read more]
mikeboll64 replied to the topic John 1:1 in the forum Scriptural Teachings 12 years ago
Quote (jammin @ June 25 2014,22:21)we never say third God.we say three persons but one in nature, God.I know……. because you very rarely talk about God #3 at all. Don't you feel a little bad that you spend so much time talking about God #1 and God #2 – and just basically IGNORE God #3 completely?
mikeboll64 replied to the topic John 1:1 in the forum Scriptural Teachings 12 years ago
Quote (jammin @ June 25 2014,22:18)therefore all spirit beings are equal with God in essence if i will FOLLOW YOUR argument. give me a version that says angels and evil spirits are equal with God in essenceJohn 4:24God is spirit, and his worshipers must worship in the Spirit and in truth.Hebrews 1:14Are not all angels ministering spirits sent to…[Read more]
mikeboll64 replied to the topic Graphene in the forum Evidence for the Bible 12 years ago
If I had any money, I would likely try to invest in this groundbreaking product.
mikeboll64 replied to the topic PLEASE NOTE in the forum Rules, Help Desk & Notices 12 years ago
Well done.

mikeboll64 replied to the topic What does it mean that Jesus came in the flesh? in the forum Scriptural Teachings 12 years ago
Kerwin,I believe you misunderstand those scriptures you posted.Romans 5:15 speaks of the transgression of one man (Adam), and how that transgression caused the death of many men. Then it goes on to speak about how the gift of grace given to us by the actions of one man (Jesus Christ) will cause the everlasting life of many men.The action of that…[Read more]
mikeboll64 replied to the topic Firstborn of/over all creation in the forum Truth or Tradition 12 years ago
God was his literal Father, Pierre. God used His Holy Spirit to impregnate Mary with the seed of the human Jesus.The wording doesn't mean God's Holy Spirit was a PERSON, who was the LITERAL father of Jesus. It means GOD fathered Jesus BY MEANS OF His Holy Spirit.
mikeboll64 replied to the topic Who and why is enoch? in the forum Scriptural Teachings 12 years ago
Quote (Ed J @ June 25 2014,09:25)Quote (mikeboll64 @ June 25 2014,13:36)Why do you think they make such a big deal out of telling us that God loved us so much He gave up His FIRSTborn Son for us? Hi Mike, It instead says his “only-begotten Son”I was thinking that Romans 8:32 said, “did not spare his FIRSTBORN Son” – but I was mistaken.How about…[Read more]
mikeboll64 replied to the topic Who and why is enoch? in the forum Scriptural Teachings 12 years ago
Quote (Ed J @ June 25 2014,09:22)Quote (mikeboll64 @ June 25 2014,13:36)Quote (Ed J @ June 24 2014,03:32)Your idea works here, Heaven was created before Earth and DOES HAVE preeminence “In the beginning God created the heaven and the earth” (Gen 1:1)But, YOUR THEORY falls apart here, because “GRASS” was created before MAN, but Man has t…[Read more]
mikeboll64 replied to the topic Who and why is enoch? in the forum Scriptural Teachings 12 years ago
Quote (Ed J @ June 25 2014,09:04)Quote (mikeboll64 @ June 25 2014,13:20)JESUS is the firstborn of every creature for through JEHOVAH all things were createdHi Mike, yep, that's it!It makes sense because, that is in harmony with the rest of Scripture, while your interpretation is NOT in harmony with the rest of Scripture.No it doesn't make…[Read more]
mikeboll64 replied to the topic Who and why is enoch? in the forum Scriptural Teachings 12 years ago
Quote (Ed J @ June 25 2014,08:53)Hi Mike, “Who is the image of the invisible God” (Col 1:15) If Col.1.16 is referring to Jesus, all things created would INCLUDE GOD; but if Col.1.16 is instead referring to God, all things would not include himself. If you could understand this concept, you would see it cannot be talking about Jesus…[Read more]
mikeboll64 replied to the topic John 1:1 in the forum Scriptural Teachings 12 years ago
Quote (Ed J @ June 25 2014,15:27)Quote (jammin @ June 26 2014,07:09)i do not believe there are two Gods. i believe there are three persons but one in nature, God.Hi Jammin, Who's this third “Person” you speak of?Good question, Ed. Trinitarians always tell us that the Word (Jesus) was with THE FATHER in the beginning. (John 1:1) But I wonder how…[Read more]
mikeboll64 replied to the topic John 1:1 in the forum Scriptural Teachings 12 years ago
Quote (jammin @ June 25 2014,14:17)mike said: Christ is EQUAL with God in essence BUT he is not all powerful. hahahathat is most ridiculous argument i have ever heard.That's right. Christ is equally a spirit being, just like his and our God, Jehovah, is.His and our God, Jehovah, is the only one who is All Powerful. Jehovah's servant Jesus is…[Read more]
mikeboll64 replied to the topic John 1:1 in the forum Scriptural Teachings 12 years ago
Quote (jammin @ June 25 2014,14:09)Quote (mikeboll64 @ June 24 2014,10:30)Revelation 21:22I did not see a temple in the city, because the Lord God Almighty and the Lamb are its temple.In the above verse, is Jesus “the Lamb”? Or is he “the Lord God Almighty”?So it doesn't matter that a Trinitarian commentator WANTS Jesus to be “the Lord God…[Read more]
mikeboll64 replied to the topic John 1:1 in the forum Scriptural Teachings 12 years ago
Quote (carmel @ June 25 2014,12:40)Quote (mikeboll64 @ June 22 2014,14:54)In cases like that, we must decide if it should be translated as, “was existing in the form of God“, or, “was existing in the form of a god“.Now that I've just noticed this, I'm leaning towards “a god”, since it make a better contrast to “form of a servant”.Mike,SCRIPTURE…[Read more]
mikeboll64 replied to the topic John 1:1 in the forum Scriptural Teachings 12 years ago
Quote (kerwin @ June 25 2014,10:19)Unto is fairly useless word that replace to in all but the case when to is an accompaniment of the infinitive or as a placement of until.Try it in English Kerwin – complete with punctuation.Use quotation marks around the words you are defining, and commas and such, so we can understand you.Let me help:”Unto” is a…[Read more]
mikeboll64 replied to the topic Firstborn of/over all creation in the forum Truth or Tradition 12 years ago
Quote (Wakeup @ June 25 2014,16:30)Quote (mikeboll64 @ June 25 2014,14:12)I already gave you the NAME, Wakeup……… the first time you asked. The NAME is “Jesus”. So why do you keep saying that I “can't” give you a name?
Also, since you keep IGNORING it in the other thread, I will once again point out these things for you:1. If you are rig…[Read more]mikeboll64 replied to the topic Firstborn of/over all creation in the forum Truth or Tradition 12 years ago
Quote (Ed J @ June 25 2014,13:44)Quote (942767 @ June 26 2014,06:31)It does not mean that the Holy Ghost indwelt him at that time. The Holy Ghost indwelt him after he was baptized in water at the Jordan river.Exactly. I don't know why others have so much trouble accepting this.I don't accept that Jesus lived his first 30 years on earth…[Read more]
mikeboll64 replied to the topic Firstborn of/over all creation in the forum Truth or Tradition 12 years ago
Quote (942767 @ June 25 2014,13:25)Quote (mikeboll64 @ June 24 2014,11:39)Quote (942767 @ June 22 2014,14:48)He did not say that the Father did not tell him to say that he came to do God's will. You did. Certainly, God did show him why He sent him.Absolutely Marty!I have no doubt that the Father let Jesus know WHY He was sending him from h…[Read more]
- Load More

