T8:  I think that the part of these mountains above the curve are visible, but yes, the lack of air clarity could hide the peaks if they are distant enough. This is certainly the case with Ruapehu which I can attest to.

Don’t you realize that’s what I’ve been saying all along?  🙂  Despite what you keep saying, the air there is NOT crystal cle…[Read more]

T8:  I’m pretty sure that if you can see something in the distance that this something could be reflected.

It certainly can… on a flat surface – not over a curve.  And his point is that there are many feet of water bulge between him and the tower.  Therefore the reflection could only make to the top of the bulge on the tower side.  The reflec…[Read more]

T8:
Measuring Earth’s Radius With A Telescope?
Mike. This video demonstrates how you can see over the horizon..

I forgot about this one from yesterday. At the 1:51 mark, your guy is baffled by seeing the reflection of the tower in the lake.  That reflection kills anything else he has to say, because it is impossible if the lake is curved.  The ref…[Read more]

The first man to enter the stratosphere said the earth “appeared a flat disk with upturned edge”.  No fisheye lenses back then i guess.  😁

Lol. Freeze it at the 2:51 mark and take in that perfectly flat horizon.  That’s what happens with fisheye lenses… simply by moving the camera you can make things convex, flat and concave.  Your boy Neil DeGrasse Tyson says we can’t see the curve from any plane or high altitude balloon.  He says you have to actually be in space to see it.

Go for it… but remember, only ones that regular people like us can verify for ourselves, okay?  In the meantime, what is your response to my last Ruapehu comments?  When is your rebuttal of my solar eclipse shadow point coming?

T8:  Finally, have you noticed that my photo and a few other rare events are scrutinised to the enth degree, while the vast majority of globe earth proof videos and photos are completely dismissed.

We’re talking thousands of photos and other proofs…  versus not one single verifiable proof of a globe.  But let’s not get distracted here.  We’r…[Read more]

You keep making my point for me.  Listen closely this time…

According to the ball earth math, the top  half of Ruapehu should be visible from that vantage point ALL THE TIME. Now you keep telling me how clear it is there, and asking why you can only rarely see Ruapehu… but that’s what I’m asking you!  Why CAN’T you see it every day when th…[Read more]

You usually can’t see Ruapehu at all, but on especially clear days, you see all of it. It’s not like there are days when you can see only the top half of it, and other days when you can see all of it. On the days you can see it, you see all of it. The other days you see none of it.  Your explanation fails, as if it was ever plausible or…[Read more]

Well? Can you see the top half of Ruapehu every day? If not, then your explanation is done for, leaving only the sensible explanation… ie: mine.

Hey, I just thought of something!  In your photo, only HALF of the mountain is supposed to be hidden behind the ball earth, remember?  So if YOUR explanation that sometimes the mountain magically projects itself up over the curve is correct, then you should see the top half of it EVERY DAY! Now what?

I’ve taken photos of Superstition Mountain from 55 miles away – and even did a video about it.  Many days you cannot see it from 10 miles away.  Now what is the most likely scenario…

1.  Some days the entire mountain is hidden behind a curved earth from only 10 miles away.
2.  Some days the air is clear enough that you can see the mountain tha…

[Read more]

T8:  Glad to hear this because it kinda draws a line in the sand. Either you are right and that would be troublesome for science or you will be proven wrong, providing a near knockout punch.

It’s not troublesome for “science”, but for scientism.  Or as Paul terms it, “science falsely so-called”.

T8:  As you say, there is no comeback, so what hap…

[Read more]

Worked

T8:  I will try to focus on disproving the premise in this video. And what if I am able to do that Mike, would you consider the Flat Earth argument wrong, or will you just find some other idea to back until that has been disproved and move on again? I know that most of your videos I have disproved sufficiently for myself such as the marble on t…

[Read more]

T8:  Mike, this is your best video yet in terms of attempting to disprove the heliocentric model…  But this video has no comeback on the outset, so I am curious as to what the explanation will be. 

Thanks.  What could they possibly say at this point?  Either the moon moves 2288 mph or 60,000 mph.  It must be the latter to overtake the rotati…[Read more]

Hey T8, I started getting emails the minute I complained to you about not getting them… before you did anything.   🙂  The notification button is still doing the same thing.  But I couldn’t care less about that.  I’m ecstatic that I can hit “Submit” and come right back to where I was instead of the first post of the first page of the thre…[Read more]

Here’s the much shorter version of the eclipse shadow video.  See if you can refute anything I’ve said…

T8:  Okay, so you have the answer then.

1. The moon’s orbit is 1.5 million miles
2. It does that orbit in 27.3 days
3. It moves 2288 mph.

So what exactly is the issue again?Are you saying it doesn’t do this? Because? Try to make it easy so not too much time is spent on this.

The 1.5 million mile orbit of the moon is 60 times the dista…[Read more]

They say the moon’s orbit is 1.5 million miles, and since it does that orbit in 27.3 days, it moves 2288 mph.  That’s how they get the speed so no, it is not a perspective from Earth thing.