T8, are the bluffs in the foreground of your photo a part of Ruapehu?

Does that mean you were able to maneuver your way back and forth to read everything as I wrote it?  😁  What a mess!  And since T8 didn’t know who Lyell was, or that he is considered the father of modern geology, then I’m sure he doesn’t know that modern geologists have disregarded his uniformitarianistic ideas and have recognized that our ge…[Read more]

You’ve got to be kidding me!  Now I just realized that I cut off D4T’s quote in the middle, and so edited to fix it, and part one of the two posts I had to break in half won’t post now!  Here’s what’s going on…

You can see from that screen shot that a post quoting D4T was already on your site right behind my post to you about Ruapehu, r…[Read more]

Okay, again I posted those last two as one post.  It appeared on the site just fine.  Then I wanted to edit it to make the Hugh Ross quote red, and it would no longer post.  I even closed HN and reopened it.  No luck.  So again I had to copy and paste just the first half and post it… and then go back and copy and paste the second half and post…[Read more]

But I’m both saddened and sickened that people like T8 will go searching out people like Hugh Ross to help them twist the actual words of our Lord and Savior to make him sound like an idiot who didn’t know what he was talking about.  “Well, day 6 is not technically the beginning of creation, is it?”  It is when you’re saying it 1.5 million days l…[Read more]

D4T:  T8, you seem to love it when people cast doubt on the written Word of God. You say that you don’t believe in evolution but quote Hugh Ross who does. Scary. He believes in subhumans that preceded Adam. So death and suffering were before sin. If I were to list all of the contradictions of Scripture that Hugh Ross promotes there wouldn’t be e…

[Read more]

D4T:  T8, you seem to love it when people cast doubt on the written Word of God. You say that you don’t believe in evolution but quote Hugh Ross who does. Scary. He believes in subhumans that preceded Adam. So death and suffering were before sin. If I were to list all of the contradictions of Scripture that Hugh Ross promotes there wouldn’t be e…[Read more]

D4T:  T8, you seem to love it when people cast doubt on the written Word of God. You say that you don’t believe in evolution but quote Hugh Ross who does. Scary. He believes in subhumans that preceded Adam. So death and suffering were before sin. If I were to list all of the contradictions of Scripture that Hugh Ross promotes there wouldn’t be e…

[Read more]

T8:  …once your math is fixed, then yes the photo can be taken on a globe earth.

Are you daft?  No, seriously… I’d like to know.  Is Ruapehu 9176 feet tall?  Yes.  Would 5473 feet of it be missing in your photo if we lived on a ball?  Yes.  That is my math, T8.  There is no “fixing” needed.

Can you see it for yourself here?  This is just…[Read more]

Ah, so now the second part finally posted.  I didn’t change anything. I only copied and pasted one half first, and then the other half.  Why wouldn’t it all post together… especially when it had already posted as one earlier?

But if you want to believe that any man can look at any rock and determine how old it is – all the way to billions of years in the past – then you go right on believing such nonsense.  And if you want to believe that radiometric dating accounts for anything at all, then you simply haven’t spent even an hour looking into it.  You’ve been h…[Read more]

Okay, that’s the first half of it finally.  Now let’s see if the second half will post…

T8:  Very unscientific to say that an old earth implies Evolution…

It’s very unscientific to say an old earth at all.  All the actual observational science clearly and distinctly points to a very young earth that went through a very recent worldwide flooding event.  In other words, real science has ALWAYS aligned perfectly with what the Bi…[Read more]

Nope… still won’t post.  I took the Wiki link back out, but it won’t post.

T8:  Very unscientific to say that an old earth implies Evolution…

It’s very unscientific to say an old earth at all.  All the actual observational science clearly and distinctly points to a very young earth that went through a very recent worldwide flooding event.  In other words, real science has ALWAYS aligned perfectly with what the Bi…[Read more]

T8:  Very unscientific to say that an old earth implies Evolution…

It’s very unscientific to say an old earth at all.  All the actual observational science clearly and distinctly points to a very young earth that went through a very recent worldwide flooding event.  In other words, real science has ALWAYS aligned perfectly with what the Bi…[Read more]

I have been trying to post something for quite a while.  That happened the other day too.  I made the post, later it was just gone, and I have to page back through Chrome to find it and post it again.  This time it posted once already.  It was before my previous text about the “span” crap.  In fact, it was the one that posted with the “span” crap…[Read more]

T8:  Very unscientific to say that an old earth implies Evolution…
It’s very unscientific to say an old earth at all.  All the actual observational science clearly and distinctly points to a very young earth that went through a very recent worldwide flooding event.  In other words, real science has ALWAYS aligned perfectly with what the Bible sa…[Read more]

That last one posted all buggered up with the “span” crap.  It’s done that so many times that I’m tired of fixing it.  You’d think in this day of technology, one could make a post with some italics and different colors without breaking the system.  Oh well…

T8:  Very unscientific to say that an old earth implies Evolution…

It’s very unscientific to say an old earth at all.  All the actual observational science clearly and distinctly points to a very young earth that went through a very recent worldwide flooding event.  In other words, real science has ALWAYS aligned perfectly with what the Bible sa…[Read more]