Here’s the Cannon EOS 50 megapixel sensor.  $2000…

Yes… with my $500 camera that is notorious for having a pathetically small sensor for this day and age…

There are tons of photography articles condemning the P900’s very small sensor. It’s 16 megapixels… compared to slightly more expensive cameras with 50 megapixels.  It’s a trade-off for the extreme zoom capabilities.  They had to fit a…[Read more]

Yes, that was part of my moon argument.  Why is it that my $500 camera can take fairly hi res photos of the moon from 240,000 miles away – but GE’s million dollar cameras take lower res from 10,000 times closer?   Let’s start there, since as it turns out, it’s not that I’m “not smart enough”, but that I’m playing the game so many levels above yo…[Read more]

T8:  You can find that info out using Google Earth.

You already did this, remember?  There is no hill on South Island that is higher – FROM SEA LEVEL – than 900 meters… except for Ruapehu.  Your “900 meters missing” argument is debunked, which means your Ruapehu photo confirms flat Earth – just like I said all that time ago.

Why do you su…[Read more]

T8:  I’m saying lots of places have bad quality low res shots…

I’m asking you WHY?

Please explain to me how these satellites know to take hi res photos where people live, and low res ones where they don’t.

Are you even listening to yourself?  Run your argument past your wife or kids.  See what they say about it.

Are you seriously saying that these thousands of satellites can take good photos of everywhere on earth except Antarctica?  And that it’s because not too many people live there?  😅

Go re-read my BBC Amazon documentary story.  You appa…[Read more]

That last post was nothing but blathering nonsense. Come, let’s reason together…

1.  Satellite/balloon/airplane footage is all taken from whatever camera is on the particular aerial vessel, right?

2.  If balloon A has an 8K camera, then ALL of the footage will be 8K, right?

3.  Balloon A’s camera can’t pick and choose which part of the la…[Read more]

Poor little tater.  Put his neck out, got it chopped off, but has no other “argument” – so has no other choice but to stick with his “cameras only take hi res where people live” lunacy!  🤣😅😁

So amusing to watch you constantly reaching into the very depths of the incredulity part of your brain to gather such ludicrous rescue devices against the Bible, against scientific observation, and against rational reasoning. 😁

Do YOU have a setting on YOUR camera that allows you to shoot higher quality only where the subject is in the…[Read more]

Tick tock… what’s the answer to the question?  Tick tock…

D4T:  What’s the deal with tater? 

😁😂🤣  Taters gonna tate!

D4T:  I saw that last video you posted the other day…

FEB must have re-uploaded that video or something.  YouTube has yesterday as the upload date.  That’s why I thought it was so cool.  I spent the morning typing all that stuff to t8, then went and watched the NFL playoffs with my Dad. …[Read more]

t8:  Yep, just zoomed in to Antarctica on Google Earth because it shows the continent in the correct projection and saw mountains, glaciers, flat ice plains, areas with no ice, icebergs, and even roads, buildings, and what looks like silos.

Now pick a spot in the middle of the “continent” and zoom in.  Or you can just watch the 12 minute mark of t…[Read more]

If Australia actually existed, I’m sure it would be full of lizard people!  😁

What a trip!  Looks like we don’t have to do Antarctica.  Another flat earther put out a video after our discussion which basically amounted to a verbal version of everything I typed today.  He goes to Antarctica on Google Earth, and even talks about Captain Cook’s voyage and the other one by the British ship Challenger  (I mistakenly called it…[Read more]

Okay… here’s a 1 minute short by Nat Geo I found in 5 seconds. How many aerial shots do you see?

Or better yet, let’s just pick a place in the middle of nowhere in the outback, and zoom in on Google Earth to see if it’s real or CGI pixels.

Yep, just zoomed in on a little town called Warburton in the middle of nowhere. Real houses, roads,…[Read more]

T8, in those Sahara treks, they always have BBC aerial camera shots where they zoom in from “outer space” and zero in on our trekkers on the ground.  Do any of the Antarctica treks have this?  Were live documentaries even made about these treks? Why not?

Dude, copying and pasting propaganda pieces are not helping your case.  I’m asking for PROOF, or at the very least least your honest response to my logical thinking question I’ve repeatedly asked.

Whose view does Google Earth support?

Great.  Now pick ONE of them, and let’s actually confirm it happened.  Let’s start by finding aerial or satellite footage of this person in the interior of Antarctica. How about Fierce Felicity?  She got two airdrops, right?  Let’s see the aerial footage from the drop planes as they flew from the edge base all the way to the interior – showing Fel…[Read more]

Great.  Pick any name from that list, and let’s see if we can VERIFY the claim, okay?  Let’s see what you can come up with as far as verification.

In the meantime, doesn’t Google Earth show what we’d expect if I’m right – and not what we’d expect if you’re right?

Less empty talk and anecdotal “evidence”, and more of the actual proof I asked for, please. Thanks. 😉

Let’s start here…

In your view, wouldn’t we see actual photographic evidence of the entirety of Antarctica on Google Earth – instead of photographic evidence that the edges truly exist, but CGI for the interior?

In my view, where there is…[Read more]