Quote (WorshippingJesus @ Jan. 15 2011,09:35)Quote (mikeboll64 @ Jan. 14 2011,17:33)Quote (WorshippingJesus @ Jan. 15 2011,09:11)Quote (mikeboll64 @ Jan. 14 2011,16:47)Quote (WorshippingJesus @ Jan. 15 2011,06:06)yet Jesus is everything that the Father isReally?  Is the Father begotten by someone?MikeNo because the Father didn't come in the…[Read more]

Quote (WorshippingJesus @ Jan. 15 2011,09:34)Quote (mikeboll64 @ Jan. 14 2011,17:31)Quote (WorshippingJesus @ Jan. 15 2011,09:02)The NET notes clearly say that when referring to the “One True God” it is a name.Yes Keith.  And Wikipedia, Encyclopoedia Britannica and many other sources agree with that.But you and I know different, don't we?  We k…[Read more]

Quote (WorshippingJesus @ Jan. 15 2011,09:31)Quote (mikeboll64 @ Jan. 14 2011,16:45)Quote (WorshippingJesus @ Jan. 15 2011,04:32)Quote (mikeboll64 @ Jan. 13 2011,20:39)Really guys?  Still nothing?  I'll post it a THIRD time.  Jack, prove that you're not running and hiding right now.  You seem to have plenty of time for ridicules………how abo…[Read more]

Quote (WorshippingJesus @ Jan. 15 2011,09:19)Quote (mikeboll64 @ Jan. 14 2011,17:02)Quote (WorshippingJesus @ Jan. 15 2011,07:45)Hi MikeThen when Moses said “In the beginning 'elohiym (God) created the heavens and the earth”, Moses wasn’t speaking of the “supernatural or supreme being who created the universe?  What are you talking about?Of course…[Read more]

Quote (WorshippingJesus @ Jan. 15 2011,09:15)Quote (mikeboll64 @ Jan. 14 2011,16:51)Are you saying that it is so important that this thread be in the debates section despite how you yourself explained the debates section to Istari, that you are willing to change the title just so it can be there?  Sure why not? Why shouldn't the readers be able…[Read more]

Quote (WorshippingJesus @ Jan. 15 2011,09:11)Quote (mikeboll64 @ Jan. 14 2011,16:47)Quote (WorshippingJesus @ Jan. 15 2011,06:06)yet Jesus is everything that the Father isReally?  Is the Father begotten by someone?MikeNo because the Father didn't come in the flesh. But the Word that was with God and was God did!If Jesus was in very nature God…[Read more]

Quote (WorshippingJesus @ Jan. 15 2011,09:02)The NET notes clearly say that when referring to the “One True God” it is a name.Yes Keith. And Wikipedia, Encyclopoedia Britannica and many other sources agree with that.But you and I know different, don't we? We know that God is a title and God has a name, right? mike

Quote (Kangaroo Jack Jr. @ Jan. 15 2011,08:15)WJ said to Mike:Quote YHVH said there is no God formed before him or after him, and he has not contradicted himself.The scripture concurs with WJ:TO ALL:Mikeboll has dogmatically claimed that Jesus is a god who “came into being” after YHWH. Keith has corrected Mike about this many times but Mike has…[Read more]

Quote (Kangaroo Jack Jr. @ Jan. 15 2011,08:06)WJ asked Mike:Quote Are you creating a new religion or something?Yeap he is! JackNope. Just bringing back to light the original one. You know, the one you trinitarians have butchered throughout the years! Stay close and pay attention to the debate, Jack. You will learn more than you did in our…[Read more]

Quote (WorshippingJesus @ Jan. 15 2011,07:45)Hi MikeThen when Moses said “In the beginning 'elohiym (God) created the heavens and the earth”, Moses wasn’t speaking of the “supernatural or supreme being who created the universe?  What are you talking about?Of course Moses was speaking of the “supernatural or supreme being who created the univer…[Read more]

Quote (WorshippingJesus @ Jan. 15 2011,06:14)Quote (mikeboll64 @ Jan. 14 2011,14:01)Quote (Ed J @ Jan. 14 2011,15:06)Hi Mike,If it gets moved back, it needs to have more in the title bar: like.. “Mikeboll64 vs francis: comments on debate from those following it”.It seems that it interests other members as well and is probably the most read debate…[Read more]

Quote (WorshippingJesus @ Jan. 15 2011,06:06)yet Jesus is everything that the Father isReally? Is the Father begotten by someone?

Quote (WorshippingJesus @ Jan. 15 2011,04:32)Quote (mikeboll64 @ Jan. 13 2011,20:39)Really guys?  Still nothing?  I'll post it a THIRD time.  Jack, prove that you're not running and hiding right now.  You seem to have plenty of time for ridicules………how about for one little answer?Scripture says our only one true God is THE FATHER.  How do y…[Read more]

Quote (Kangaroo Jack Jr. @ Jan. 15 2011,03:40)Note that in the second debate “plural God” he started whining about the terms in the middle of it.Hey Jack,What did we both learn from that debate?  Does the plural word “elohim” in and of itself imply that YHVH is a plural being?  YES or NO?     mike

Quote (Kangaroo Jack Jr. @ Jan. 14 2011,19:30)Mike is not a skillful thinker.Jack,Scripturally speaking, is just being called by the title “elohim” or “theos” enough to mean you are God Almighty?  YES or NO?That is all I'm trying to establish.  Let's see if you'll actually answer a question from me or just keep posting ad hominems.P.S.  How do…[Read more]

Quote (SimplyForgiven @ Jan. 14 2011,15:57)Quote (mikeboll64 @ Jan. 14 2011,05:32)I love that Dennison, at the young age of 21, has such an in depth knowledge of scripture and spends his days thinking about God.  I love you and Jack for teaching me so many things about the scriptures and for being my catalyst to delve even deeper into them every…[Read more]

Quote (SimplyForgiven @ Jan. 14 2011,15:55)Its a fallacy to say that the interpretation of Elohim solely means “Judge” or “Ruler.  why? because as you said in your second to last post, that “Elohim” is interpreted by the CONTEXT!Hi D,I didn't say the word “elohim” is “interpretated by the CONTEXT”.  What is interpretated by the context is w…[Read more]

Quote (francis @ Jan. 15 2011,01:40)Since you are in the distinct minority among Biblical translators as to what Hebrews 1:8 says……We'll see.    (Not that it really matters how many trinitarian scholars say it's “black” when the scriptures say it's “white”.)Quote (francis @ Jan. 15 2011,01:40)So… why not translate Hebrews 1:8 as you u…[Read more]

Hi Francis,I wrote a long response to your last post……………but then decided it is just a diversion from what we are REALLY discussing right now.  So I deleted it.I'll just wait for your response to my post and hold my tongue about the rest.  We're debating scriptural truths, not the antics of Keith and Jack and SF, and I shouldn't have e…[Read more]

Quote (Ed J @ Jan. 14 2011,15:06)Hi Mike,If it gets moved back, it needs to have more in the title bar: like.. “Mikeboll64 vs francis: comments on debate from those following it”.It seems that it interests other members as well and is probably the most read debate at h-net! I have not even bothered to read most debates, but this one between you…[Read more]