Quote (WorshippingJesus @ Mar. 05 2011,08:43)John 1:1 is proof that Jesus is God when you take it in context of 1:3 “not one thing came into being” without Jesus yet the Hebrew scriptures tell us God alone created all thingsOr is it proof that Jesus, himself a mighty one, was with THE ALMIGHTY ONE in the beginning, and that THE ALMIGHTY ONE…[Read more]

Quote (Paladin @ Feb. 24 2011,07:29)If I understand this “Incarnation” trinity theory, you are telling me that Jesus preexisted with the Father in eternity, then “incarnated” by the Holy spirit in the womb of Mary.Scripture tells a far different story. At least three times in three different accounts, we are told that Jesus is the seed of Adam or…[Read more]

Quote (terraricca @ Mar. 05 2011,07:30)WJof cause not ,but it is strange that Math;28;19 does not appears in the Hebrew gospel,and that it make the trinitarian so happy,all know that the holy spirit is not a person,(based on all scriptures)and that there is only two baptism the one of John and the one in the name of Christ Jesus,one is for the…[Read more]

Quote (Kangaroo Jack Jr. @ Mar. 05 2011,04:22)So all humans are the same being in the sense that they are the same substance.Hi Jack,I've yet to receive and answer from you:How many human beings are on this planet?mike

Quote (Kangaroo Jack Jr. @ Mar. 05 2011,02:48)Mike,Keith has already finished you off by noting that the Catholic Encyclopedia says that the Church changed their practice. This says nothing about the written text does it? So you read it wrong.Jack,If they “changed their practice”, then that means that they too USED TO baptise into the name of…[Read more]

Quote (Kangaroo Jack Jr. @ Mar. 05 2011,02:40)God's gives each of us individuality.Yes Jack,God gave EACH of us individuality………….INCLUDING HIS SON JESUS. Jesus is an individual, self contained being who is different from the God who begot him.mike

Quote (WorshippingJesus @ Mar. 04 2011,09:11)That’s it Mike, I am done with you. I now know I am wasting my time, because no matter what you will deny scriptures that disagree with you.This is a scriptural debate and Matthew 28:19 is scripture, and unless you can present evidence it is not, but only claim it is corrupt, then you lose the war!    <…[Read more]

Quote (Kangaroo Jack Jr. @ Mar. 04 2011,03:26)Click on the link I have provided for ALL the fragment quotes in your video source in their FULL CONTEXT. http://www.torahresource.com/English….ism.pdfWhen are you going to learn Mikey?Hi Jack,The Tyndale source you quoted doesn't shed any light on this.  It merely admits the problems some have with…[Read more]

Quote (WorshippingJesus @ Mar. 04 2011,15:23)Look again Mike how you have reinvented words because according to you Jesus is not of the “same kind” as the Father who is God.Keith,If Jesus is the “same kind” AS his Father, who is God, then he is NOT his Father, who is God.  And since we are VERY CLEARLY taught in scripture that the Father is the…[Read more]

Quote (WorshippingJesus @ Mar. 04 2011,15:23)These are your own words Mike…Quote (mikeboll64 @ Jan. 06 2011,17:00)And I don't know of a scripture that calls Jesus “the true god”, but I agree that he is..Keith, could you show the link to where you found this statement?  I feel like maybe you “inadvertently” quoted me out of context.Quote (W…[Read more]

Quote (WorshippingJesus @ Mar. 04 2011,15:23)He is not the same person but is the same “being”, human because “Adam” means mankind. Okay, that's what I was after.  So you are following Jack's absurdity because you think that's the only option you have.  Keith, look at this from Dictionary.com:6. a human being; person:Do you see the indefinit…[Read more]

Quote (Paladin @ Mar. 04 2011,09:09)Is anyone going to respond to the issues raised in the OP?I am! I'm battling wars in at least 5 other active threads right now, but things slow down here during the weekend. So I'll take up where I left off in schooling you about the pre-existence of our Lord, through whom the universe was created. mike

Quote (t8 @ Mar. 04 2011,18:22)Quote (WorshippingJesus @ Mar. 05 2011,02:36)No matter how you cut it if Jesus is of the “God kind” then he is God and no less God than God or he is not of the “God kind” at all.The argument is no God-kind. But that Jesus is (not) God himself. It is written that he existed with divine nature or God's form, and that…[Read more]

Quote (Kangaroo Jack Jr. @ Mar. 04 2011,11:25)Of course the word “Adam” refers to the species of mankind. That's why ontologically we are all “The Adam.”Hi Jack,I take it your answer to my question about Genesis 6:7 was a “NO”? Were you not able to find any translation that says “THE ADAM” in 6:7? Thought so. Until you do, the rest of your post…[Read more]

Quote (WorshippingJesus @ Mar. 04 2011,09:36)Do you have a scripture that says “adam” is less “adam” than “Adam”?Here you go, Keith.ONE of your questions DIRECTLY AND HONESTLY answered in exchange for ONE of my questions DIRECTLY AND HONESTLY answered, okay? Is that a deal?Here's YOUR question: Do you have a scripture that says “adam” is less…[Read more]

Quote (WorshippingJesus @ Mar. 04 2011,09:23)MikeSo let me see if I understand. “The light in you is Mike?”You know what Keith? I had a response all ready to post, and then deleted it. I'm trying hard these days to keep myself clear of your diversions.If you want to discuss “light of the world” more in depth, I will. But not until we're…[Read more]

Ed, WHY IS ONE “NEW EARTH” REFERRED TO AS MORE THAN ONE “AGE”?Answer my question DIRECTLY! I don't need pages of scriptures and website addresses.mike

Quote (Paladin @ Mar. 03 2011,04:12)May I correct you? The plural form of El is El'm ; Elohim is the plural form of Eloahh. Eloahh is the singular form of Elohim. You may need to access the Hebrew script, as Strong may not differentiate this “El'm” business.Absolutely………..if you have facts to back up what you say!    I checked, you are c…[Read more]

No Ed,You explained “universe” away by saying the “new Earth” is what was created through Jesus. Then you posted “ages”, with an “s”.Is there more than one “new earth” that you know of? If not, then why do you suppose it says “ages”, as in PLURAL?mike

Quote (Ed J @ Mar. 03 2011,20:09)(Google) whom (YHVH) established heir (over) all and through whom he made the ages.Why do you suppose it says “ages”, as in PLURAL?mike