Quote (Ed J @ Mar. 12 2011,10:06)Hi Mike,Google has John 1:1 translated the same as “AKJV Bible”!   …Certainly you CANNOT call Google biased!John 1:1 In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God.(Google) In the beginning was the Logos, and the Word was with God, and God was the word,God blessEd J (Joshua…[Read more]

Quote (Ed J @ Mar. 12 2011,09:57)Quote (mikeboll64 @ Mar. 13 2011,03:35)Quote (WorshippingJesus @ Mar. 12 2011,09:13)MikeDavids so called evidence has already been debunked!Debunked?  By whom?  Keith, DO THE COPTICS RENDER IT AS “a god” or not?mikeHi Mike,Although I don't agree with the JW's (N.W.T.) rendering of John 1:1,”both” forms of Coptic (…[Read more]

Quote (WorshippingJesus @ Mar. 12 2011,09:40)Quote (mikeboll64 @ Mar. 11 2011,21:12)1.  The Word is THE God.2.  In the beginning, THE God was WITH THE God.  (God is ONE BEING, so the ONE BEING of God cannot possibly be WITH the ONE BEING of God.)  3.  THE God became flesh, and people were able to see THE God and touch THE God, in direct cont…[Read more]

Quote (WorshippingJesus @ Mar. 12 2011,09:30)But the most important evidence is the scriptures themselves that do not teach Polytheism.It is very telling that this is your “most important evidence”, Keith.  Because you yourself have admitted there WERE “gods” mentioned in scripture who were neither God Almighty nor false gods.  But who really c…[Read more]

Quote (WorshippingJesus @ Mar. 12 2011,09:13)MikeDavids so called evidence has already been debunked!Debunked? By whom? Keith, DO THE COPTICS RENDER IT AS “a god” or not?mike

Quote (WorshippingJesus @ Mar. 12 2011 @ 09:09)They are false gods and not “The God”. Ah, but that was not your point, was it?  Your point was that the indefinite article is not added before the word “god”.You were wrong, right?  Furthermore, when the people of the island of Malta thought Paul must have been a “mighty one”, why would you assume t…[Read more]

Keith, would you answer these?Quote (WorshippingJesus @ Mar. 05 2011,12:24)There are billions of beings known as “mankind”. Is there more than “one mankind”? Is there more than “one Godkind?Thank God.  You have fallen away from Jack's absurdity that humankind consists only of ONE BEING.  But now that you admit there are billions of INDIVIDUAL…[Read more]

Quote (mikeboll64 @ Mar. 09 2011,19:58)You're welcome Jack.    I also admit that the word “god” in reference to Deborah can mean SHE is the True God.Quote (WorshippingJesus @ Mar. 11 2011,12:23)Whats this? “..the word “god” in reference to Deborah can mean SHE is the True God”Quote (Kangaroo Jack Jr. @ Mar. 11 2011,13:50)Let's see here… D…[Read more]

Quote (mikeboll64 @ Mar. 10 2011,21:17)Do I need to go through the 8482 times the indefinite article “A” is added into scripture?Quote (WorshippingJesus @ Mar. 11 2011,11:09)Not with the word “theos”, God you can't, can you?Yes, as a matter of fact I can.Acts 28:6 NIV6The people expected him to swell up or suddenly fall dead, but after waiting a…[Read more]

Yeah, I reposted it. That's what the “Bump for D” at the top means. And I'm glad you did read it, but I was waiting for an answer to the question at the end of it.mike

Quote (WorshippingJesus @ Mar. 11 2011,14:56)No one has seen God at any time; the only begotten God who is in the bosom of the Father, He has explained Him. John 1:18 NIVKeith,I am really starting to feel sorry for you.  You have truly been blinded by the god of this age.Look at the scripture you yourself posted.  NO ONE HAS SEEN GOD AT ANY T…[Read more]

Quote (WorshippingJesus @ Mar. 11 2011,14:56)Quote (mikeboll64 @ Mar. 10 2011,19:23)Keith, Mike is to human as God is to spirit.Good MikeNow follow it through….No Keith, YOU follow it through! Where's the rest of my post? Oh, here it is:The only begotten son of the being of Mike will be human and will be LIKE Mike, but not Mike himself.The…[Read more]

This is very telling.  This is how every single question goes when debating with trinitarians.  It's like pulling teeth.  And it shouldn't be.It is truly a sad state of affairs when Trinitarians can't honestly answer the most simple and direct question with a direct answer.  What are they hiding?  The fact that their doctrine is so comically flaw…[Read more]

Quote (WorshippingJesus @ Mar. 11 2011,11:34)No Mike. I said they are mentioned in scriptures. I didn't say I believe they are Gods.No, actually what you said, rather INSISTED, is that the word “elohim” MEANS “God”.  It doesn't, but that's what you and Francis and SF and Jack all insisted.So then you said that all of the “elohim” in scripture who…[Read more]

Quote (Kangaroo Jack Jr. @ Mar. 11 2011,11:27)You need only to go through the twenty out of twenty-two times that the NWT does not insert the indefinite article when there is no article before the word God.Hmmm………….I wonder if that could be because those times ARE actually talking about God Almighty?

Bump for DHey D,Come back when you're ready to base your scriptural understanding on the actual scriptures, okay?There are many gods, lords and messiahs mentioned in the Bible. And almost all of them are vice regents of the Most High God, Jehovah.But I'll tell you what: If you DO insist on claiming there is only ONE God in scripture, then at…[Read more]

Quote (Baker @ Mar. 08 2011,03:17)Quote (Gene Balthrop @ July 10 2010,00:24)To all……Back to the thread……….> the word I am has nothing to do with the word Lucifier at all. The word Lucifer means rising star as the king of Babylon was before God cut him down, It has nothing to do with an elusive (BEING) called a devil,or a Satan. Pure…[Read more]

Quote (Ed J @ Mar. 03 2011,21:06)Quote (mikeboll64 @ Mar. 04 2011,14:01)Ed, WHY IS ONE “NEW EARTH” REFERRED TO AS MORE THAN ONE “AGE”?Answer my question DIRECTLY!  I don't need pages of scriptures and website addresses.mikeHi Mike,One new earth age and one previous earth age.Adding (s) to the end of a word means plural.God bless  Ed J…[Read more]

Amen, Ed.

Quote (mikeboll64 @ Mar. 09 2011,20:24)Is it GRAMMATICALLY POSSIBLE to translate the Greek words in John 1:1c into English as “and the Word was a god”?Quote (WorshippingJesus @ Mar. 10 2011,16:31)NOBecause John was not a Polytheist and the Bible is not a Polytheistic book.But Keith, let me remind you once again of your OWN words:Quote (mikeboll64…[Read more]