Colter,Let us ignore the badly informed UBtHenews.com claim of homo erectus and cherry pick homo antecessor, who scientists claim was the “man” around 1 million years ago. Scientist claim anatomically correct human beings appeared on the scene 200,000 years ago. 39,000 years ago is a reasonable estimate of the introduction a derived form of…[Read more]

Quote (mikeboll64 @ Mar. 17 2013,13:36)Quote (Lightenup @ Mar. 12 2013,21:59)Common experience tells us that wisdom comes forth from within a person and in that sense, wisdom is born. So, whenever you read in scripture that wisdom has come forth in some way, metaphorically it was born.I disagree.  Wisdom can be displayed by many people, but it…[Read more]

Quote (mikeboll64 @ Mar. 17 2013,13:24)Quote (kerwin @ Mar. 16 2013,19:22)Cain was a son of God until he was cut off for slaying Able.So the question is was Cain disowned by God and Adam?What evidence exists that he was.What evidence exists that he was not.Kerwin,In the absense of scripture that says Cain WAS disowned, I think we need to assume he…[Read more]

Quote (mikeboll64 @ Mar. 17 2013,07:04)Quote (kerwin @ Mar. 16 2013,07:57)T8 and all,Adam was THE Adam is right.Adam was adam is right.Okay Kerwin,In the beginning was Cain.  And Cain was with THE adam, and Cain was adam.Is this also correct?ABE, this question is also for you.Mike,That is a true English statement.

Quote (t8 @ Mar. 17 2013,09:31)Quote (kerwin @ Mar. 17 2013,03:57)Quote (t8 @ Mar. 16 2013,18:11)It's not hard to understand.Without the article it is not identifying anyone, it is qualifying.Eve was THE Adam is wrong.Eve was adam is right.adam means man.God created adam, male and female.T8 and all,Adam was THE Adam is right.Adam was adam is…[Read more]

Quote (Colter @ Mar. 17 2013,05:13)The UB Explains that man has been on the earth for 1 million years, that's why we keep digging up bones and civilizations that are far older then the bibles young earth.The UB reveals that Adam & Eve  were incarnate celestial Sons of God on a populated earth.Jesus was a revelation of the Father, he didn't act…[Read more]

Quote (mikeboll64 @ Mar. 17 2013,03:04)Quote (kerwin @ Mar. 16 2013,00:29)The sons of God, Israel, noticed that the daughters of men, Gentiles, were good looking…………So the daughters of the Hebrew people were NOT “daughters of adam“?How can this be, if the Hebrews were descendants of Adam?Even if you don't believe the book of Enoch is…[Read more]

Quote (Colter @ Mar. 16 2013,23:29)Quote (kerwin @ Mar. 17 2013,02:29)Colter,I was pointing out that if you ignore the discrepancy is dates scientist of today agree with much of the creation legend. How did these primitive priest get this information correct?KerwinIt seems you have added large numerical interpretations to the 6 day creation story…[Read more]

Colter,My eyes rolled at the new age words “institutionalized religion”. That is an anarchist teaching and not one from God. I am not even sure what the words “institutionalized religion” mean to you. Do mean that every man is to do as he please? The best alternative is to do as God please; and so be institutionalized in him.I believe that I…[Read more]

Colter,I was pointing out that if you ignore the discrepancy is dates scientist of today agree with much of the creation legend. How did these primitive priest get this information correct?

Quote (t8 @ Mar. 16 2013,18:11)It's not hard to understand.Without the article it is not identifying anyone, it is qualifying.Eve was THE Adam is wrong.Eve was adam is right.adam means man.God created adam, male and female.T8 and all,Adam was THE Adam is right.Adam was adam is right.In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with the god, and…[Read more]

Quote (Colter @ Mar. 16 2013,16:12)Quote (mikeboll64 @ Mar. 16 2013,14:31)Quote (Colter @ Mar. 15 2013,07:32)Smile, It makes sense if you realize that Adam and Eve were much older, 39,000 years, the new story fill's the genealogical gap and shortens time. They elevated themselves to Gods chosen people instead of Melchizedek's predicted people.…[Read more]

Quote (Colter @ Mar. 16 2013,02:56)Quote (kerwin @ Mar. 16 2013,05:42)Colter,Quote Jesus never taught human sacrifice, nor was human sacrifice a part of Judaism, nor was the sacrifice of a miraculous person part of the original gospel…….HOWEVER, the sacrifice of a divine God/man WAS a common theme across many pre-Christian mythology's in Rome,…[Read more]

Quote (mikeboll64 @ Mar. 16 2013,12:09)Quote (mikeboll64 @ Mar. 05 2013,17:54)Quote (kerwin @ Mar. 05 2013,15:39)Mike,Quote So if Paul had said, “The love of money is the seed of all kinds of evil”, we would understand that the love of money came first, and the product of that love of money is all kinds of evil.I have always perceived that greed…[Read more]

Quote (Lightenup @ Mar. 16 2013,01:54)Here we go again…article theology! John, a poor uneducated fisherman who, I doubt knew Greek well enough to write it, wrote as inspired by God. There are at least a couple of times in the first chapter of John that have theos without an article and Origen and those who agree with him would be having to back…[Read more]

Quote (mikeboll64 @ Mar. 16 2013,08:27)Quote (kerwin @ Mar. 15 2013,04:13)To all,I cannot put my finger on it but where are there two theos in John 1:1.  Is it a hinted at interpretation?Kerwin,There are TWO “things” that are called “theos” in John 1:1.  One of these “theos” was said to have been WITH the other one of these “theos”.Can one thing b…[Read more]

Quote (mikeboll64 @ Mar. 16 2013,12:09)Quote (mikeboll64 @ Mar. 05 2013,17:54)Quote (kerwin @ Mar. 05 2013,15:39)Mike,Quote So if Paul had said, “The love of money is the seed of all kinds of evil”, we would understand that the love of money came first, and the product of that love of money is all kinds of evil.I have always perceived that greed…[Read more]

Quote (mikeboll64 @ Mar. 16 2013,12:14)Kerwin,I fail to see how your post addresses my post.  The sons of God noticed that the daughters of men were good looking, and so took some of them and procreated with them.How could these words be said about HUMAN men?Mike,Quote The sons of God noticed that the daughters of men were good looking, and so…[Read more]

Quote (Colter @ Mar. 15 2013,21:38)Quote (kerwin @ Mar. 16 2013,02:06)Quote (Colter @ Mar. 15 2013,19:14)Quote (mikeboll64 @ Mar. 15 2013,12:06)Quote (Colter @ Mar. 14 2013,05:38)He brought much ridicule upon himself by going up and down the river valley advocating that all houses be built of wood, boat fashion, and that the family animals be put…[Read more]

Quote (mikeboll64 @ Mar. 16 2013,08:33)Quote (kerwin @ Mar. 14 2013,20:49)In the Law of it is the Hebrews the children of the most high.Yeah, but all the Hebrew “sons of God” married human women, Kerwin.  So why make a point of mentioning that these particular “sons of God” went into “daughters of MEN”?Quote (kerwin @ Mar. 14 2013,20:49)Never the…[Read more]