Quote (942767 @ Aug. 10 2013,05:01)Quote (kerwin @ Aug. 10 2013,09:44)Marty,The Koine Greek and Englis seems to loose some of the Hebrew meaning as there is only one true gods(elohim).  In English we try to regain some of it by capitalization.  God is God and not a god.  A god is gods representative, whether loyal or not.Hi Kerwin:He is “The Go…[Read more]

T,Romans 3:23-24Authorized (King James) Version (AKJV)23 for all have sinned, and come short of the glory of God; 24 being justified freely by his grace through the redemption that is in Christ Jesus: Jesus is not part of the group called all as he the one in who the redemption lies and not one of those to be redeemed.

T,Quote this is why Christ has no Father according to the flesh but only an adopted one Joseph, Christ could not be receiving anything from his mother according to the flesh (Mary was an surrogate mother ),because his true mother was in heavenThe flesh is made from David's seed.  Is an adopted child made from his/her ancestors seed?

T,Quote but this could not be done through a man born of the flesh ,because no man can save another says scriptures from his own sins or others sins ,because all men are born short from God's glory ,THIS ARE FACTS ,so how could God save humanity and yet use the flesh You have the idea of a man saving humanity and the idea of God saving humanity by…[Read more]

Marty,The Koine Greek and Englis seems to loose some of the Hebrew meaning as there is only one true gods(elohim). In English we try to regain some of it by capitalization. God is God and not a god. A god is gods representative, whether loyal or not.

Mike,No, I cannot conceive of a sound and valid argument to support your teaching “that the Word being made flesh DIDN'T contradict the flesh being the seed of David”.

Quote (mikeboll64 @ Aug. 10 2013,03:40)Quote (kerwin @ Aug. 08 2013,19:31)I previously stated the Word translated to flesh but it did not transform as that would contradict the flesh being of the seed of David.And what if I could show you scripturally that the Word being made flesh DIDN'T contradict the flesh being the seed of David?Would you then…[Read more]

Quote (mikeboll64 @ Aug. 10 2013,03:45)Quote (kerwin @ Aug. 08 2013,19:38)I don't find the experts words untrue but only complex and so a very doubtful understanding of Paul's words.Kerwin,Here are the two choices of translation:1.  Abraham is our father according to the flesh.2.  What righteousness did our father Abraham ever achieve according t…[Read more]

T8,Is Princess an atheist?

Quote (Ed J @ Aug. 09 2013,12:57)Question #5:Hi Kerwin,Thus saith the Lord GOD; There shall none of my words be prolonged any more, but the word which I have spoken shall be done, saith the Lord GOD.” (Ezek 12:28)Will the word which God has spoken be done  –  “Yes” or “No”?God blessEd J (Joshua 22:34)http://www.holycitybiblecode.orgEd,Your q…[Read more]

Quote (Ed J @ Aug. 09 2013,12:09)Quote (kerwin @ Aug. 09 2013,16:53)Ed,No one said Abraham fulfilled God's command to sacrifice Isaac.Kerwin,The NIV is a perversion of God's word!   GOD did NOT command Abraham to sacrifice Isaac. God blessEd J (Joshua 22:34)http://www.holycitybiblecode.orgEd,I don't see where this is productive communications as…[Read more]

Marty,All I know is that Scripture calls both angels and man god. God is sometimes called elohim(gods) as are those others hold equivalent to him. I also know that angels were present when gods stated “let us make man in our image, and our likeness” and some angels bear the outer likeness of mankind.

Quote (Ed J @ Aug. 09 2013,07:57)Quote (kerwin @ Aug. 09 2013,10:46)Ed,Genesis 22:9-10Authorized (King James) Version (AKJV)9 And they came to the place which God had told him of; and Abraham built an altar there, and laid the wood in order, and bound Isaac his son, and laid him on the altar upon the wood. 10 And Abraham stretched forth his hand,…[Read more]

Quote (mikeboll64 @ Aug. 09 2013,07:23)Quote (kerwin @ Aug. 08 2013,19:15)Mike,Those experts seem to prefer a complex understanding in  claiming that Paul is hypothetically claiming Abraham is our father according to the carnal nature if he and we are to obtain righteousness by works.Kerwin,Please proof-read your posts to see if they make sense…[Read more]

Mike,You seem to want John 1:14 to mean the Word was transformed into a human being even though you know the flesh was made of the seed of David. Unless you believe the Word is the seed of David you have two different ingredients the human being was made of. I previously stated the Word translated to flesh but it did not transform as that would…[Read more]

Mike,Those experts seem to prefer a complex understanding in  claiming that Paul is hypothetically claiming Abraham is our father according to the carnal nature if he and we are to obtain righteousness by works.  They are correct that the clause “according to the flesh” can either have a spiritual or physical meaning.I prefer a more simple u…[Read more]

Mike,It is possible that the “Word was made flesh”” can imply the “Word was made into flesh” as I can understand the clause “”the ingredients were made cake” as “the ingredients were made into cake”.  After all the ingredients are in the cake.  The Word translates from a not flesh state to a flesh state but is not transformed into flesh as the f…[Read more]

Ed,Genesis 22:9-10Authorized (King James) Version (AKJV)9 And they came to the place which God had told him of; and Abraham built an altar there, and laid the wood in order, and bound Isaac his son, and laid him on the altar upon the wood. 10 And Abraham stretched forth his hand, and took the knife to slay his son.

T8,the peer review process worked.

Princess,I don't believe humans transform into demons and I don't believe in Lilith. Both are Jewish myths.I assume from that, that you are speaking of what some claim sounds like separate accounts of creation in Genesis 1 and 2. Am I correct?