@t8.

You are confusing when you make a point and then another one the disagrees with it. Do you realize you are doing this? Are we using the same words differently?

@t8.

You are confusing when you make a point and then another one the disagrees with it. Do you realize you are doing this. Are we using the same words differently?

@admin,

Kerwin’s response:
If the question is that the angel is stating Jesus was born the prophesied Savior then the answer is yes.
If the question is that the angel is stating Jesus was born the foretold Christ then the answer is also yes.
If the question is that the angel is not stating that Jesus is the present Christ as opposed to p…

[Read more]

@admin,

Still are arrogant.

Your unrepentant heart angers me.

Now you are lying.

@t8,

The antichrist spirit reveals itself more commonly than the Spirit of Christ. We are taught to deny it within our selves and oppose it without.

t8,

Same reason that people might be tempted to give something up now for short-term gain and long-term loss when they are vulnerable.

These words imply that you believe Jesus was not actually the king when he was tempted but would gain that birthright, which was his by God’s choice, if he was patient and did not rebel.

Togel,

Off Topic: Thanks for the passage from Deuteronomy as I did not know what scriptures supporting the particular teaching you speak from.

As for the topic I doubt that Satan had doubts of the angels words and he certainly knows they do not lie though he probably interprets them as his desires command. I do not know how he could interpret…[Read more]

@Ed,

Jesus used name calling. Why?

@t8,

I am angry because I see that you are stubbornly setting yourself up against Christ because “natural” human desires. Salvation is in the gospel and preaching Christ crusaded is preaching the gospel.

I find it hard to believe a person is not a liar when they claim you have not answered after you have answered it. You really have to watch…[Read more]

@Princess,

Personally, I do not have to attain an goal of becoming god like.

That is why Jesus said that it is easier for a camel to go through the eye of a needle than a rich man to go to heaven.

All of us are rich humans but what is impossible for a human is possible for God. Have faith and believe.

@Lightenup,

According to Paul the body that is planted is not the body arises. The example of this is Jesus who was planted in a mortal body and arose in an immortal body that bore the marks of his self-sacrifice. All the dead, both the wicked and righteous, will likewise rise from the dead in an immortal body. That body like Jesus’ will be…[Read more]

Ed,

Answering once in the “Affirmative” and once in the “Negative” to
the identical question posed with different wording

This nonsense is your beast nature speaking because you are well aware of context.

The context is that salvation would not occurs until thirty years after Simon because the gospel is not about Jesus’ but rather about [Read more]

EdJ,

You are double minded as you believe we that salvation is in the gospel and that Simon literally saw it.

Make up your mind but to me salvation is in the gospel and means to for it to be fulfilled.

It is my argument than wins in the way God desires not the works of the flesh.

AndrewAD,

Peter is correct about some of Paul’s writing being hard to understand and we have less than the individuals his letters were addressed to as we lack some if not most of the unwritten context. Even when it is clear some people still misunderstand him.

Gene,

Edj….NO GOD WAS NOT A GOD UNTIL HE BECAME A GOD. YOU HAVENT A CLUE WHAT THE WORD GOD MEANS OR YOU WOULD UNDERSTAND THAT. THE WORD GOD IS A RELATIVE TERM, IN FACT THERE ARE MANY HE YEHWEH IS NOT THE GOD OF.

I was wondering if Ed got your words correct but now I see he does.

I also see what your reason is though I am not sure God is a r…[Read more]

Ed,

All that is proved is that you twist the words which is probably why you like and no questions that are open to interpretation.

I understand it that you are walking according without even being aware of it; possibly because you do not test your own life and doctrine.

I handles small beasts and I suppose if you choose to act like one I…[Read more]

Ed,

I am not sure of what Gene said or the reason behind it though I have my suspicions. I worded my point different than what he you claimed he did.

Ed,

You are well aware that Jesus saved us by his sacrifice on the cross and yet you deny it.

How can you honestly claim that you are confident that the gospel of Christ is “the power of God unto salvation to every one that believeth” if you instead believe that Simon literally saw salvation 30 odd years before. The bottom line is that you…[Read more]

@Lightenup,

The spirit and soul of the Son is what would have taken on flesh. The spirit and soul had always existed, imo.

I assume you are basing this claim on your interpretation of John 1:14. I disagree with that interpretation as logos simply means logos and is not a title for the Christ.

@Lightenup.

What do you believe qualified the Son to take away the sins of mankind?

He was and is a human that did not sin though tempted as we are.(Hebrews 4:15, Hebrews 2:14)

In addition his mercy led him to sacrifice himself for for the world, and the creatures within, to be free from corruption. (Hosea 6:6)

In that way he condemned…[Read more]