Quote Actually,I DO understand English, jammin.  On the other hand, it seems you sometimes struggle with it.If I am granted eternal life, then I – from that moment on – will be an eternal being.  I would be ETERNAL, jammin.On the contrary, being ETERNAL does NOT necessarily mean FROM eternity.Angels were created as ETERNAL beings – never to die.  …[Read more]

Quote (mikeboll64 @ May 02 2014,10:45)WHO does Gill think the “God” is in Phil 2:6?It seems to me he says the word “God” refers to THE FATHER.  That means Gill DOESN'T think the word “God” refers to a “nature/species” known as “God”.So Gill is indeed supporting me on the thing we were actually discussing.really? hahahathat is only your…[Read more]

hahaha. mikeprofilestudied at UNIVERSITY OF MORON… hahaha

Quote (mikeboll64 @ April 30 2014,11:17)Quote (jammin @ April 29 2014,10:53)Gill said God is nothing but nature and essence. do you believe that? you just cut and paste the short phrase of gill's commentary.That's right.  I cut and pasted the ONLY part that had to do with our discussion, jammin.We weren't discussing who thinks Jesus is “God by…[Read more]

Quote (mikeboll64 @ April 30 2014,11:04)Quote (jammin @ April 29 2014,10:50)you said MANY who will someday be eternal.where is that>? what verse is that? hahahaHere's just one of the many, jammin:John 3:16For God so loved the world that he gave his only begotten Son, that whoever believes in him shall not perish but have eternal life.This verse…[Read more]

Quote (mikeboll64 @ April 29 2014,14:07)Quote (jammin @ April 28 2014,00:04)Christ created the heavens and the earth. Only God can do that. He is truly God just like his father. Praise God!jammin,Don't you mean “Praise Gods!” ?    You say the Father is “God” and the Son is “God”, and that they are DIFFERENT persons.  In any sensible mind, that ad…[Read more]

Quote (mikeboll64 @ April 29 2014,13:58)Quote (jammin @ April 27 2014,16:16)Therefore it is very clear that the son and the father HAVE THE SAME FORM.Agreed.then the topic should be closed. check mate!Christ is God just like his father. they have the same form, God. good job mike. you are now enlightened

Quote (mikeboll64 @ April 29 2014,13:54)Quote (jammin @ April 27 2014,16:08)Mike Haha hahaha. I told you to read the whole thing before posting here Gill saidit is not to be supposed of him; or any accidental form, for there are no accidents in God, whatever is in God, is God; he is nothing but nature and essence, he is the , the JehovahIll…[Read more]

Quote (mikeboll64 @ April 29 2014,13:44)Quote (jammin @ April 27 2014,15:51)Mikehahaha you are really a moron.cant you see what matthew said??? Matthew Henry's Concise CommentaryNotice the two natures of Christ; his Divine nature, and human natureMatthew will never say that if he is not referring to the human and divine nature of christ. The phil…[Read more]

Quote (mikeboll64 @ April 29 2014,13:22)Quote (jammin @ April 27 2014,15:41)MikeYou dont understand again what barclay said. Hahahaha you are a moron. Ill post it againMorphe (Greek #3444) is the essential form which never alters…………Read Mark 16:12, jammin.Did Jesus appear to them in a DIFFERENT morphe?  YES.Was Jesus' “essential form”…[Read more]

Kerwin The father said his son is God Niv Heb 1:8 but about the son he says, your throne, o God. . . 10 . . .you laid the foundations of the earth and the heavens are the work of your hands.Christ created the heavens and the earth. Only God can do that. He is truly God just like his father. Praise God!

Mike 'I suggest you study greek. According to your explanation, you have no formal study in greek. You are a great pretender hahaha. You posted commentaries AGAINST your belief. Your mistake was you did not read the whole thing that is why yo dont understand what you are saying. Hahaha.

Quote (kerwin @ April 27 2014,14:30)Quote (jammin @ April 27 2014,09:14)Mike Here is the analysis of barnesbarnes notes on the bible The second opinion is, that the word is equivalent to nature, or being; that is, that he was in the nature of God, or his mode of existence was that of God, or was divine. This is the opinion adopted by Schleusner…[Read more]

Therefore it is very clear that the son and the father HAVE THE SAME FORM. The son is not the father. The father is not the son but they are both God by nature. They have ONE FORM. the son is God just like his father. Me and my father are both human by nature. We have the same form. Im not my father but we are both man by nature. That morphe cant…[Read more]

Mike Haha hahaha. I told you to read the whole thing before posting here Gill saidit is not to be supposed of him; or any accidental form, for there are no accidents in God, whatever is in God, is God; he is nothing but nature and essence, he is the , the JehovahIll repeat. He said. . .he is nothing but nature and essence, he is the , the Jehovah,

Mikehahaha you are really a moron.cant you see what matthew said??? Matthew Henry's Concise CommentaryNotice the two natures of Christ; his Divine nature, and human natureMatthew will never say that if he is not referring to the human and divine nature of christ. The phil 2:6-7 refers to his nature God and human nature. He was existing in the form…[Read more]

Quote (mikeboll64 @ April 28 2014,03:36)WQuote (jammin @ April 26 2014,20:28)….His already existing STATE OF EQUALITY with God…..When Jamiesson says “with God”, who (not “what”) is the “God” he is talking about?There is no argument about that boy. He is with God and that is his father. You dont have to question that if you are english. Unless…[Read more]

MikeYou dont understand again what barclay said. Hahahaha you are a moron. Ill post it againMorphe (Greek #3444) is the essential form which never alters; schema (Greek #4976) is the outward form which changes from time to time and from circumstance to circumstance. For instance, the morphe (Greek #3444) of any human being is humanity and this…[Read more]

MikeThe point is YOU DONT UNDERSTAND THOSE COMMENTARIES HAHAHA. you just cut and paste and trying to gave your fairy tale doctrine a wonderful explanation from those commentaries but it didnt work hahaha. Did you read what barnes said? You dont agree that the form refers to nature and you posted barnes note BUT HE SAID FORM IS NATURE AND THIS IS…[Read more]

Mike Here is the analysis of barnesbarnes notes on the bible The second opinion is, that the word is equivalent to nature, or being; that is, that he was in the nature of God, or his mode of existence was that of God, or was divine. This is the opinion adopted by Schleusner (Lexicon); Prof. Stuart (Letters to Dr. Channing, p. 40); Doddridge, and…[Read more]