Hi Miia,

You ask for answers, but reject the process it takes to understand how the pieces fit together.

Hi BD,

Please be specific as to what you are trying to say. Are you trying
to imply that Simon of Cyrene was crucified instead of Jesus,
because he carried Jesus’ cross the last part of the way?

Ed J

Are you suggesting Simon of Cyrene was crucified instead of Jesus? … (<– please answer )

Hi BD,

Please be specific as to what you are trying to say. Are you trying
to imply that Simon of Cyrene was crucified instead of Jesus,
because he carried Jesus’ cross the last part of the way?

Ed J

Are you suggesting Simon of Cyrene was crucified instead of Jesus? (<– please answer )

Hi BD,

Please be specific as to what you are trying to say. Are you trying
to imply that Simon of Cyrene was crucified instead of Jesus,
because he carried Jesus’ cross the last part of the way?

Ed J

BD, Is that what you are suggesting?
Need I remind you of your words…

ALL OF THAT IS MADE UP, RIGHT?

Are you suggesting Simon of Cyrene was c…[Read more]

Who carried the cross? Jesus was not crucified!

Hi BD,

Please be specific as to what you are trying to say. Are you trying
to imply that Simon of Cyrene was crucified instead of Jesus,
because he carried Jesus’ cross the last part of the way?

Ed J

BD, Is that what you are suggesting?
Need I remind you of your words…

ALL OF THAT IS M…

[Read more]

Who carried the cross? Jesus was not crucified!

Hi BD,

Please be specific as to what you are trying to say. Are you trying
to imply that Simon of Cyrene was crucified instead of Jesus,
because he carried Jesus’ cross the last part of the way?

Ed J

BD, Is that what you are suggesting?
Need I remind you of your words…

ALL OF THAT IS M…

[Read more]

Who carried the cross? Jesus was not crucified!

Hi BD,

Please be specific as to what you are trying to say. Are you trying
to imply that Simon of Cyrene was crucified instead of Jesus,
because he carried Jesus’ cross the last part of the way?

Ed J

BD, Is that what you are suggesting?
Need I remind you of your words…

ALL OF THAT IS M…

[Read more]

Who carried the cross? Jesus was not crucified!

Hi BD,

Please be specific as to what you are trying to say. Are you trying
to imply that Simon of Cyrene was crucified instead of Jesus,
because he carried Jesus’ cross the last part of the way?

Ed J

BD, Is that what you are suggesting? … (<– please answer )

Need I remind you…[Read more]

The scriptures don’t have both carrying the cross ever. John says Jesus CARRIED his cross period and the other 3 Gospels say Simon carried the cross there is no scripture that has this scene of them carrying the cross together or Jesus being too injured to carry it himself ALL OF THAT IS MADE UP, RIGHT?

Hi BD,

WRONG, Luke clearly states Simon c…[Read more]

The scriptures don’t have both carrying the cross ever. John says Jesus CARRIED his cross period and the other 3 Gospels say Simon carried the cross there is no scripture that has this scene of them carrying the cross together or Jesus being too injured to carry it himself ALL OF THAT IS MADE UP, RIGHT?

Hi BD,

WRONG, Luke clearly states Simon c…[Read more]

The scriptures don’t have both carrying the cross ever. John says Jesus CARRIED his cross period and the other 3 Gospels say Simon carried the cross there is no scripture that has this scene of them carrying the cross together or Jesus being too injured to carry it himself ALL OF THAT IS MADE UP, RIGHT?

Hi BD,

WRONG, Luke clearly states Simon c…[Read more]

The scriptures don’t have both carrying the cross ever. John says Jesus CARRIED his cross period and the other 3 Gospels say Simon carried the cross there is no scripture that has this scene of them carrying the cross together or Jesus being too injured to carry it himself ALL OF THAT IS MADE UP, RIGHT?

Hi BD,

Luke clearly states Simon c…[Read more]

Brother Ed,
But you are not speaking on this topic in the other thread – you are discussing numbers!?!

Hi Miia,

That’s another WRONG conclusion on your part; the other thread was never about numbers!
Instead, the facts have to be FIRMLY established to base any conclusions on them.
Thus the need to firmly establish the facts becomes absolutely n…[Read more]

Brother Ed,
But you are not speaking on this topic in the other thread – you are discussing numbers!?!

Hi Miia,

That’s another WRONG conclusion on your part; the other thread was never about numbers!
Instead, the facts have to be FIRMLY established to base any conclusions on them.
Thus the need to firmly establish the facts becomes absolutely n…[Read more]

Brother Ed,
But you are not speaking on this topic in the other thread – you are discussing numbers!?!

Hi Miia,

That’s another WRONG conclusion on your part; the other thread was NEVER about numbers!
Instead, the facts have to be FIRMLY established to base any conclusions on them.
Thus the need to firmly establish the facts becomes absolutely n…[Read more]

Brother Ed,
But you are not speaking on this topic in the other thread – you are discussing numbers!?!

Hi Miia,

That’s another WRONG conclusion on your part. The other thread was NEVER about numbers!
Instead, the facts have to be FIRMLY established to base any conclusions on them.
Thus the need to firmly establish the facts becomes absolutely n…[Read more]

Brother Ed,
But you are not speaking on this topic in the other thread – you are discussing numbers!?!

Hi Miia,

That’s another WRONG conclusion on your part. The other thread was never about numbers!
Instead, the facts have to be FIRMLY ESTABLISHED to base any conclusions on them.
Thus the need to firmly establish the facts becomes absolutely n…[Read more]

Brother Ed,
But you are not speaking on this topic in the other thread – you are discussing numbers!?!

Hi Miia,

That’s another WRONG conclusion on your part. The other thread was never about numbers!
Instead, the facts have to be firmly established to base any conclusions on them.
Thus the need to firmly establish the facts becomes absolutely n…[Read more]

Brother Ed,
But you are not speaking on this topic in the other thread – you are discussing numbers!?!

Hi Miia,

That’s another WRONG conclusion on your part. The other thread was never about numbers!
Instead the facts have to be firmly established to base any conclusions on them.
Thus the need to firmly establish the facts becomes absolutely n…[Read more]

Brother Ed,
But you are not speaking on this topic in the other thread – you are discussing numbers!?!

Hi Miia,

That’s another WRONG conclusion on your part. The other thread was never about numbers!
Instead the facts have to be firmly established to base any conclusions on them.
Thus, the need to firmly establish the facts becomes absolutely n…[Read more]