Absolutely no confusion on my part, Ed. The law and the prophets were unto John, (Luke 16.16). Then came grace and TRUTH, (John 1.17). No prophecy is a matter of ones own interpretation, (2 Peter 1.20). Peter says the heavens and earth will be destroyed, so does Jesus. Matthew 24 is split up into two parts. First part is the destruction of…

[Read more]

Absolutely no confusion on my part, Ed. The law and the prophets were unto John, (Luke 16.16). Then came grace and TRUTH, (John 1.17). No prophecy is a matter of ones own interpretation, (2 Peter 1.20). Peter says the heavens and earth will be destroyed, so does Jesus. Matthew 24 is split up into two parts. First part is the destruction of…

[Read more]

Absolutely no confusion on my part, Ed. The law and the prophets were unto John, (Luke 16.16). Then came grace and TRUTH, (John 1.17). No prophecy is a matter of ones own interpretation, (2 Peter 1.20). Peter says the heavens and earth will be destroyed, so does Jesus. Matthew 24 is split up into two parts. First part is the destruction of…

[Read more]

Absolutely no confusion on my part, Ed. The law and the prophets were unto John, (Luke 16.16). Then came grace and TRUTH, (John 1.17). (1)No prophecy is a matter of ones own interpretation, (2 Peter 1.20). Peter says the heavens and earth will be destroyed, so does Jesus. Matthew 24 is split up into two parts. First part is the destruction of…

[Read more]

Absolutely no confusion on my part, Ed. The law and the prophets were unto John, (Luke 16.16). Then came grace and TRUTH, (John 1.17). (1)No prophecy is a matter of ones own interpretation, (2 Peter 1.20). Peter says the heavens and earth will be destroyed, so does Jesus. Matthew 24 is split up into two parts. First part is the destruction of…

[Read more]

Absolutely no confusion on my part, Ed. The law and the prophets were unto John, (Luke 16.16). Then came grace and TRUTH, (John 1.17). (1)No prophecy is a matter of ones own interpretation, (2 Peter 1.20). Peter says the heavens and earth will be destroyed, so does Jesus. Matthew 24 is split up into two parts. First part is the destruction of…

[Read more]

Absolutely no confusion on my part, Ed. The law and the prophets were unto John, (Luke 16.16). Then came grace and TRUTH, (John 1.17). (1)No prophecy is a matter of ones own interpretation, (2 Peter 1.20). Peter says the heavens and earth will be destroyed, so does Jesus. Matthew 24 is split up into two parts. First part is the destruction of…

[Read more]

Absolutely no confusion on my part, Ed. The law and the prophets were unto John, (Luke 16.16). Then came grace and TRUTH, (John 1.17). (1)No prophecy is a matter of ones own interpretation, (2 Peter 1.20). Peter says the heavens and earth will be destroyed, so does Jesus. Matthew 24 is split up into two parts. First part is the destruction of…

[Read more]

Absolutely no confusion on my part, Ed. The law and the prophets were unto John, (Luke 16.16). Then came grace and TRUTH, (John 1.17). (1)No prophecy is a matter of ones own interpretation, (2 Peter 1.20). Peter says the heavens and earth will be destroyed, so does Jesus. Matthew 24 is split up into two parts. First part is the destruction of…

[Read more]

Absolutely no confusion on my part, Ed. The law and the prophets were unto John, (Luke 16.16). Then came grace and TRUTH, (John 1.17). (1)No prophecy is a matter of ones own interpretation, (2 Peter 1.20). Peter says the heavens and earth will be destroyed, so does Jesus. Matthew 24 is split up into two parts. First part is the destruction of…

[Read more]

Absolutely no confusion on my part, Ed. The law and the prophets were unto John, (Luke 16.16). Then came grace and TRUTH, (John 1.17). (1)No prophecy is a matter of ones own interpretation, (2 Peter 1.20). Peter says the heavens and earth will be destroyed, so does Jesus. Matthew 24 is split up into two parts. First part is the destruction of…

[Read more]

Absolutely no confusion on my part, Ed. The law and the prophets were unto John, (Luke 16.16). Then came grace and TRUTH, (John 1.17). (1)No prophecy is a matter of ones own interpretation, (2 Peter 1.20). Peter says the heavens and earth will be destroyed, so does Jesus. Matthew 24 is split up into two parts. First part is the destruction of…

[Read more]

Absolutely no confusion on my part, Ed. The law and the prophets were unto John, (Luke 16.16). Then came grace and TRUTH, (John 1.17). (1)No prophecy is a matter of ones own interpretation, (2 Peter 1.20). Peter says the heavens and earth will be destroyed, so does Jesus. Matthew 24 is split up into two parts. First part is the destruction of…

[Read more]

Absolutely no confusion on my part, Ed. The law and the prophets were unto John, (Luke 16.16). Then came grace and TRUTH, (John 1.17). (1)No prophecy is a matter of ones own interpretation, (2 Peter 1.20). Peter says the heavens and earth will be destroyed, so does Jesus. Matthew 24 is split up into two parts. First part is the destruction of…

[Read more]

Absolutely no confusion on my part, Ed. The law and the prophets were unto John, (Luke 16.16). Then came grace and TRUTH, (John 1.17). (1)No prophecy is a matter of ones own interpretation, (2 Peter 1.20). Peter says the heavens and earth will be destroyed, so does Jesus. Matthew 24 is split up into two parts. First part is the destruction of…

[Read more]

Absolutely no confusion on my part, Ed. The law and the prophets were unto John, (Luke 16.16). Then came grace and TRUTH, (John 1.17). (1)No prophecy is a matter of ones own interpretation, (2 Peter 1.20). Peter says the heavens and earth will be destroyed, so does Jesus. Matthew 24 is split up into two parts. First part is the destruction of…

[Read more]

Absolutely no confusion on my part, Ed.

Hi Miia,

If you want to stay lost in confusion by not watching that video that is your choice to make.
But when you give me the private interpretations of men I must remind you of God’s Prophecies.

Ed, as i said, I KNOW the Adventist interpretation of prophecy concerning the seventy weeks, etc, (and Steve Wohlberg is an Adventist). They do have SOME good points, but I do not believe the rest, and that’s why I left. No point watching what I have already learned, and forgotten.

Hi Miia,

If you want to stay lost in confusion by not watching t…[Read more]

Ed, as i said, I KNOW the Adventist interpretation of prophecy concerning the seventy weeks, etc, (and Steve Wohlberg is an Adventist). They do have SOME good points, but I do not believe the rest, and that’s why I left. No point watching what I have already learned, and forgotten.

Hi Miia,

If you want to stay lost in confusion by not w…[Read more]

Did you watch my video? There is a lot you can learn from it.

I have watched Adventist videos, and studied prophecy with them. There’s no need to watch another one. I know what they believe already.

TWO QUESTIONS

1) What do YOU believe the ‘abomination of desolation’ is
– and –
2)In what year was the ‘abominat…

[Read more]