Nick, Why persist in continuing to fight against Scripture?

Hi Ed,

There are no other verses that say what you think Micah says.

Hi Nick,

Here are just some of the verses that corroborates what Micah 5:2 says:
Bethlehem, the city where Christ was born, means “House of Bread”
“I am the bread which came down from heaven” (John 6:41)

“the Father hath sent me” (John 5:36)
“I came down from…[Read more]

Hi Ed,

There are no other verses that say what you think Micah says.

FALSE!

Bethlehem, the city where Christ was born, means “House of Bread”

“I am the bread which came down from heaven” (John 6:41)

“the Father hath sent me” (John 5:36)
“I came down from heaven” (John 6:38)

“God hath sent forth the Spirit of his Son” (Gal 4:6)

“my…[Read more]

Hi Ed,

There are no other verses that say what you think Micah says.

FALSE!

Bethlehem, the city where Christ was born, means “House of Bread”

“I am the bread which came down from heaven” (John 6:41)

“the Father hath sent me” (John 5:36)
“I came down from heaven” (John 6:38)

“God hath sent forth the Spirit of his Son” (Gal 4:6)

“I came…[Read more]

Hi Ed,

There are no other verses that say what you think Micah says.

FALSE!

Bethlehem, the city where Christ was born, means “House of Bread”

“I am the bread which came down from heaven” (John 6:41)

“the Father hath sent me” (John 5:36)
“I came down from heaven” (John 6:38)

“God hath sent forth the Spirit of his Son into your hearts,…[Read more]

Hi Ed,

There are no other verses that say what you think Micah says.

FALSE!

Bethlehem, the city where Christ was born, means “House of Bread”

“I am the living bread which came down from heaven” (John 6:51)

“the Father hath sent me” (John 5:36)
“I came down from heaven” (John 6:38)

“God hath sent forth the Spirit of his Son into your…[Read more]

That suggests you are wrong in your interpretation.

No Nick,

Micah 5:2 suggests YOU are wrong with your private interpretation of Prophecy.
“no prophecy of the scripture is of any private interpretation” (2 Peter 1:20)

“But thou, Bethlehem Ephratah, though thou be little among the thousands of Judah,
yet out of thee shall he come forth unto me…[Read more]

That suggests you are wrong in your interpretation.

Hi Nick,

Micah 5:2 suggests you are wrong in your private interpretation of Prophecy.
“no prophecy of the scripture is of any private interpretation” (2 Peter 1:20)

“But thou, Bethlehem Ephratah, though thou be little among the thousands of Judah,
yet out of thee shall he come forth unto me…[Read more]

That suggests you are wrong in your interpretation.

Hi Nick,

Micah 5:2 suggests you are wrong in your private interpretation of Prophecy.

“But thou, Bethlehem Ephratah, though thou be little among the thousands of Judah,
yet out of thee shall he come forth unto me that is to be ruler in Israel;
whose goings forth have been from
of old, from…[Read more]

That suggests you are wrong in your interpretation.

Hi Nick,

Micah 5:2 suggests you are wrong in your interpretation.

“But thou, Bethlehem Ephratah, though thou be little among the thousands of Judah,
yet out of thee shall he come forth unto me that is to be ruler in Israel;
whose goings forth have been from
of old, from everlasting.” (Micah…[Read more]

“But thou, Bethlehem Ephratah, though thou be little among the thousands of Judah,
yet out of thee shall he come forth unto me that is to be ruler in Israel;
whose goings forth have been from
of old, from everlasting.” (Micah 5:2)

That suggests you are wrong in your interpretation.

Hi Nick,

Micah 5:2 suggests you are wrong in your…[Read more]

Hi Ed,

There are no other verses that say what you think Micah says.

FALSE

Hi Ed,

(1) It seems odd that you would castigate the JWs for using one verse to claim Jesus is Michael.

(2) But then you try and do the same yourself with micah 5

Hi Nick,

1) They use more than one verse to make their assertion, the problem is
they ignore all the verses that contradict their conclusion (just like you).

2) There are many…[Read more]

Hi ED,

(1) You have yet to explain and show evidence of when Jesus was FIRST anointed.

(2) We have also yet to hear whether he had a human spirit as well as the anointing Spirit.

please answer

Hi Nick,

1) I have explained and shown much evidence already, but you ears are not yet open to it.
2) Jesus was born “the Spirit of Christ” – he did…[Read more]

Hi ED,

(1) You have yet to explain and show evidence of when Jesus was FIRST anointed.

(2) We have also yet to hear whether he had a human spirit as well as the anointing Spirit.

please answer

Hi Nick,

1) I have explained and shown much evidence already, but you ears are not yet open to it.
2) Jesus was born with “The Spirit of Christ” -…[Read more]

Hi all apostate

the day you can read the scriptures the way it was written we will talk ,you just don’t like the truth in scriptures you have to make your own version of it ,

I cannot do that

John 1;1 should be “a god” (Post #8212547)

OK Pierre,

If someone doesn’t agree with the majority of biblical views can they still be saved? y/n

____________
God bless
Ed J

Hi Pierre,

If you want to quote me, please quote me correctly;
I did not say that you lied; here is what I said:

Pierre believes that salvation is based on whether others agree with his views or not – of course that’s false.

______________
God bless
Ed J

Hi t,

Perhaps your problem is that you thought it was the spirit of a human instead of An aspect of the Spirit of God?

Hi Nick

Perhaps your problem is that you thought “the spirit of Christ” arrived at the Jordan instead of Bethlehem.

Hi,

Jesus was born at Bethlehem.

He was only said to be FULL OF THE SPIRIT after the Jordan.

Lk 4

“But thou, Bethlehem Ephratah, though thou be little among the thousands of Judah,
yet out of thee shall he come forth unto me that is to be ruler in Israel;
whose goings forth have been from
of old, from everlasting.” (Micah 5:2)