Mike, I saw this video when it first came out. Much clearer to understand for me. I did watch it again and now have a good grasp on it. I’m looking forward to a more detailed video from you guys!

I came up with a question. How can there be a full moon when the sun is on one side of the “globe” and the moon is on the others side? It just seems…[Read more]

And all you seem to do is ignore the results, as in the videos above, that support a plane earth.

You didn’t comment on the video which demonstrated the vast distances that was recorded which shouldn’t be able to be seen on a globe earth. Why not?

You see, doing experiments means accepting the results not ignoring them.

Any honest comments on the video?

Now if you really want to be blown away watch this video! This guy, doing his own research which t8’s video says doesn’t exist, captures views that dispels the notion that we live on a ball. He uses IR photography.

T8, I would like your honest assessment of this video. I think you would have a hard time contradicting the results that he has…[Read more]

For anyone wishing to understand this lensing effect of the atmosphere better here is an excellent video that is only about 4 minutes. It is done by a FEer doing his own experiments. (Which doesn’t really happen according to the video).

In your video he begins by stating that FEs don’t do their own research. Wrong. (Just ask Mike!)

He then says that there is no reason why the buildings should have any hidden height viewing them over 16 miles of water. Wrong again.

He states that there appears to be a mirage or refraction in the photograph, which he admits he knows nothing…[Read more]

😃

That’s a whole lot of mountain there!

That’s a beauty t8!

Mike, I just watched that last video and you nailed it. Seeing is believing and I’ve seen the light!

Keep up the good work, you are an encouragement to us who seek the truth and if I might add, your voice is a spectacular addition to YouTube.

Looks to me like the tree line goes all the way down to the base.  So if you can all of the tree line then you are seeing down to the base.

You know that we have shown scientifically (observable, testable and repeatable) how the bottom of objects compress and are obscured by refraction, basically the water in the atmosphere acting as a magnifying lens. But as the saying goes, “there are none so blind as those who will not see“, which seems very applicable in this instance.

Great job on the challenge video Mike!

And they say FE people are dull! “Just give me the eye height and distance and I can tell you the distance!” 🤔

I know but I get chuckle every time he brings up the car tire! It’s as if life doesn’t exist on the other side of the decimal.

And the simple point is that high vacuum chambers require a substantial structure to withstand the pressure differential. Or else they would all be made out of car tires!  ; )

I saw your last video early this morning…[Read more]

It works both ways. Is 145 psi greater than 14.5 psi? A little, a lot? Just double? That’s just one decimal place!

Now what about 14.5 and .000145? …

Get your facts first, then you can distort them as much as you please.

Mark Twain

t8: Tell me something you know without a doubt that you are good at?

Knowing when someone doesn’t know what they’re talking about.

t8: The vacuum of space is effectively at 0 bar (0 psi).

Actually it is closer to 0.00000000001 torr. Remember that decimal thing I mentioned, it’s kind of important, are you implying that it is…[Read more]

t8: 0.05 to 10 mph = 200 x times the speed.

t8: A 15 PSI increase where the increase is billions of times more than the number you start with compared to a 15 PSI increase where you double the PSI are still both a 15 PSI increase.

I hope you can see the contradiction in your two statements above. In one you are giving an accurate answer…[Read more]

Found it!

You are a winner t8, 200x is the correct answer! But I have to laugh at the contortions you go through just to deny the obvious. We are comparing “speed or time” to pressure and vacuum not gas. What do they call it when someone changes the issue to make a point? Oh well it will come to me.

So it makes no difference in speed or time…[Read more]

Hey t8,

What if a car went from 5 to 10 mph? You would say that is double the speed, right? What about 0.5 to 10 mph, would you still say that is double?

5 to 10 mph = 2 x or twice the speed

0.5 to 10 mph = 20 x or twenty times the speed

Can you grasp the math here?

Here’s a test, can you find the answer?

0.05 mph to 10 mph = ?

What is the…[Read more]