david replied to the topic Which Religion in the forum Truth or Tradition 20 years, 3 months ago
Quote I thought the JW liked the KJ anyway. If they don't, that is just one more thing I have against the religion. H, we used to use it excluvily I believe. Then, we started using many Bibles. Most JW's own a KJV.What I am saying is that you very very strongly assert that the KJV is infallible and the only infallible Bible. You make this…[Read more]
david replied to the topic The Johannine Comma in the forum Truth or Tradition 20 years, 3 months ago
We already have this thread. It already exists. It's called “1 John 5:7.” If every time we have something to say, we create a new thread, for me personally, it makes it very hard to find past posts on specific subjects. dave
david replied to the topic The Angel of the LORD in the forum Truth or Tradition 20 years, 3 months ago
JOHN 12:49“because I have not spoken out of my own impulse, but the Father himself who sent me has given me a commandment as to what to tell and what to speak.”hmmmm. Jesus was sent by his Father.hmmmm. He was commanded by his Father what to speak.Sounds an awefull lot like the exact definition of a messenger.Quote Because the bible does not…[Read more]
david replied to the topic love among all in the forum Faith 20 years, 3 months ago
Quote Hi david,You really do not understand do you?Nick, your inability to answer this question would seem to indicate that you do not understand love.Quote If you had a brother in another country Nick, a spiritual brother, or even a fleshly brother whom you loved, do you have to think twice as to whether it would be loving to kill him? Would…[Read more]
david replied to the topic Death in the forum Scriptural Teachings 20 years, 3 months ago
Sorry, that third line should have said: Do you really think I believe that there was no need…..
david replied to the topic Death in the forum Scriptural Teachings 20 years, 3 months ago
Nick, I often get the feeling that you purposely say things that are wrong in an attempt to paint me in a bad light, when you know that what you are saying isn't true.Do you really think that there was no need for Jesus to come and give his life as a ransom sacrifice?I don't see how you could. Yet, you say this. “Wow” back at you.I say one…[Read more]
david replied to the topic The Angel of the LORD in the forum Truth or Tradition 20 years, 3 months ago
Quote Who has seen them to discuss in detail their nature and abilities?And you wish to include the Son of God among them?Well that says it all doesn't it? You keep implying that angels have a different “nature” than angels. Yet, you say: “Who has seen them to discuss their nature'?If you don't even know what angels are Nick, how can you say so…[Read more]
david replied to the topic The Angel of the LORD in the forum Truth or Tradition 20 years, 3 months ago
Both the Hebrew mal·´akh´ and the Greek ag´ge·los literally mean “messenger.” From the first book of the Bible to the last, these words occur nearly 400 times. When spirit messengers are indicated, the words are translated “angels,” but if the reference definitely is to human creatures, the rendering is “messengers.”So a spirit messenger is an…[Read more]
david replied to the topic The Angel of the LORD in the forum Truth or Tradition 20 years, 3 months ago
Quote Hi david,That all spirit creatures are the same in nature.That is not written. What do you know of the nature of spirit beings? Tell me, please….So you don't argue that:–that Jesus is a spirit creature in heaven?–or that angels are spirit creatures in heaven?
david replied to the topic The Angel of the LORD in the forum Truth or Tradition 20 years, 3 months ago
Quote What is written is that he is alike to God and all the rest is presumptuous speculation.He is “alike” God. Yes, he is the image of the invisible God. Being the firstborn of creation, he has spent a lot of time with His Father. He should be like him.But he is created, hence, called the Son. The Son of God.The angels are also created,…[Read more]
david replied to the topic The Angel of the LORD in the forum Truth or Tradition 20 years, 3 months ago
Nick, what is an angel? What is the very simple very basic meaning of “angel”?Quote Hi david,You made this comment but you do not have any scriptural basis for it do you?Which part are you disagreeing with?–that Jesus is a spirit creature in heaven?–or that angels are spirit creatures in heaven?
david replied to the topic The Power of Going To Church in the forum Scriptural Teachings 20 years, 3 months ago
Quote Do not judge as we all have different roles in the body.Paul did not have regular fellowship as you would teach it.Was he wrong to travel and preach the gospel to the gentiles?Do you judge him too? If someone where to say: “I don't need to gather together with fellow believers.”And If the Bible says: 'do not forsake the gathering of…[Read more]
david replied to the topic The Power of Going To Church in the forum Scriptural Teachings 20 years, 3 months ago
Quote Hi david,I did not forsake true fellowship, in case you would like to judge me, but left the Whore and later was asked to leave my housegroup because I would not accept that their traditions were equal to the Word of God.And I commend you for that. Yet, that command remains. Why would God command something that apparently, we are unable to…[Read more]
david replied to the topic The Angel of the LORD in the forum Truth or Tradition 20 years, 3 months ago
I'm sorry, how does that make it clear?And, can you now retract or explain this comment:Quote Hi david,I am amazed you think the Word who was God with God was only an angel servant.Can you still justify saying that I believe this?
david replied to the topic The Power of Going To Church in the forum Scriptural Teachings 20 years, 3 months ago
This talk on health, whether it's healthy or not, doesn't really matter. God's word commands that we not forsake the gathering of ourselves together, as some do. Some do forsake the gathering of themselves together. True Christians are not to be like this. They would be a brotherhood, united.And no Nick, of course it wouldn't apply to all…[Read more]
david replied to the topic The Angel of the LORD in the forum Truth or Tradition 20 years, 3 months ago
Maybe it was unclear that these were quotes from me in the past two pages:Quote Jesus is a created spirit being, who happened to be Jehovahs greatest messenger. Of course, Jesus was very special, being the only begotten son.One of the ways he was a vessel was he role as the “Word,” or spokesman for Jehovah. He was, God's chief messenger…. his…[Read more]
david replied to the topic The Angel of the LORD in the forum Truth or Tradition 20 years, 3 months ago
Quote Hi david,I am amazed you think the Word who was God with God was only an angel servant. Ok, I said that Jesus is a spirt creature. I said that the angels are spirit creatures. “Was Jesus a spirit creature in heaven, just like the angels are? yes.” I'm not saying that Jesus is just like the angels Nick. I'm saying that he's a spirit…[Read more]
david replied to the topic Which Religion in the forum Truth or Tradition 20 years, 3 months ago
Quote Hi H,JW doctrine is nonsense but David is a highly valued member of this forum and his scriptural knowledge has helped us all.Then, Nick, by your own mouth, a lot of Nick Hassen doctrine is “nonsense,” as well. I mean, it would have to be, wouldn't it? The God is not a trinity doctrine for example. That's a big one. Say you don't believe…[Read more]
david replied to the topic Which Religion in the forum Truth or Tradition 20 years, 3 months ago
Quote David, you are are JW, correct? So anything you say has no credibility. For the JW religion is a false religion. If you are not JW, please state so. I notices in an earlier post that some referred to you that you are.Are you for real, Heiscoming?I have asked you about 15 times to provide any evidence at all that the KJV is infallible as you…[Read more]
david replied to the topic Nephilim in the forum Scriptural Teachings 20 years, 3 months ago
GENESIS 6:4“The Neph´i·lim proved to be in the earth in those days, and also after that, when the sons of the God continued to have relations with the daughters of men and they bore sons to them, they were the mighty ones who were of old, the men of fame.”Does not this say that the Nephilim where the mighty ones who were of old, the MEN of fame?…[Read more]
- Load More

