So that's the 149th time I've done that. You've done it 2534 times. But you're the MODERATOR. You, set the example. Of course, if you go back, I was responding to your off topic question.

Quote Hi david,So it is not written but you still teach this stuff?Why?Oh, we're back to the crazy making stuff up. Fine. I'll play too.But Nick, if you agree Jesus is an angel, then how could you say he is not the arch (chief) angel?

Nick, can Jesus be called a malwakh? (angel/messenger–same word).T8 and others assert that he obviously is called such in scripture. Can you just answer that one question?I don't think you will. You never answer my questions. Is Jesus a Malwakh?

Quote Hi david,So the WE you mention here does not include Jesus or the apostles or prophets as they never said this, but just a bunch of carnal men?No, I assume the ones who wrote it, also knew it, Nick. That's usually the case.

Being a doctor? Yes, I'd imagine.But what does that have to do with you consistently and purposefully breaking one of the rules of this forum, despite my constant pleas to desist?(I only make these repeated requests on the first few pages of threads I start.)

And that makes you superior, Nick?If you've ever read a Watchtower Nick, you might just find it contains a lot of scripture.

Quote Hi david,The view from outside is rather different.A human organisation working in their human strength to obey human commanders.All thus overlaid with a smug sense of superiority not unlike the Pharisee in the temple.Not supreriority Nick. I believe just as you do, that my beliefs are true. If I didn't believe they were true….I wouldn't…[Read more]

Quote Denial is not a river in egypt DavidI'm not saying it has never happened or that JW's are perfect. No human is. Dirty, have you noticed that when a JW does something bad…anything, the headline says: “JW did….” but when a Catholic, protestant, etc, etc, does the same thing, it doesn't say this. It either names them, or says a man from…[Read more]

Quote Hi david,You say”As far as I can tell, Nick doesn't follow the rules to any degree”What do you mean?Seriously Nick? What do I mean? In another thread, I pointed out that you were off topic. I pointed this out literally 10 times, and even posted rule #3. I feel that as a moderator, if anything you should be enforcing the rules. But you…[Read more]

Quote You need more scriptures to back up your point than Mark 16:12 as it was not transcribed on all early manuscripts and may have been added later or may have been dropped either accidentally or on purpose.—-kerwinWhat do you think of this scripture, kerwin?JOHN 21:4-7,12“However, just as it was getting to be morning, Jesus stood on the b…[Read more]

Nick, you should attempt to answer questions as much as you ask them.Stay on topic.have conversations, real ones.

Lineon, when you said “hopefully no government” I wanted to show you that there definitely would be no more human run worldly governments to divide and dominate mankind to our own injury.

Quote Quote by Lineon altered by david.Every thing will be made new,to me that is fantastic a new lanuage,no swear words, no derogatory termsand HOPEFULLY no goverments david As you can see from the post above,that you have altered my post.I did not shout at you which you indicateby altering my 'hopefully' into and HOPEFULLY no goverments I…[Read more]

Quote (dirtyknections @ Feb. 26 2009,04:11)Quote (david @ Feb. 24 2009,14:45)Regarding the silent lambs site that apostates like to promote, here is what JW's have said:“For the sake of the victims in these cases, we are pleased that a settlement has been reached. Our hearts go out to all those who suffer as a result of child abuse. Jehovah’s Wit…[Read more]

Quote (Nick Hassan @ Feb. 26 2009,10:37)Hi david, But no human religion is correct.James 1:27Religion that God our Father accepts as pure and faultless is this: to look after orphans and widows in their distress and to keep oneself from being polluted by the world.Your scripture contradicts your statement Nick.The scripture said there is…[Read more]

Since I live in Canada, and since I find the following quote extremely confusing (that it exists at all), I like to quote it, because I feel it irritates some:The Encyclopedia Canadiana (Under Jehovah’s Witnesses), second paragraph:“The work of Jehovah's Witnesses is the revival and re-establishment of the primitive Christianity practiced by Jes…[Read more]

Two thoughts–1. Why would anyone in any religion belong to that religion if they didn't feel it was the correct religion?2. The earliest Christians believed exactly that.

Do you really not know the answer? If you even knew why we believed this, you'd have to know the answer.

Quote David,I couldn't disagree more. If Jesus had not appeared in the exact same body mutiliated and unchanged, then the resurrection was a hoax. His appearance in the same body unchanged is the proof of His resurrection.which scripture says he'd be resurrected as a man? What do you think of this scirputre?Mar 16:12 After these things he…[Read more]

Speaking of partial blindness Nick,…..apparently it is written Nick. it seems to be presisely what is written.