Quote (Nick Hassan @ July 08 2007,10:36)Hi CO, You say”The gospel did change,”Gal 1″ 6I marvel that ye are so soon removed from him that called you into the grace of Christ unto another gospel: 7Which is not another; but there be some that trouble you, and would pervert the gospel of Christ. 8But though we, or an angel from heaven, preach any…[Read more]

Nick. Now that I have given you the scripture you requested, (Col.1:25) Now maybe you will answer the question: If Paul was commissined to “complete the word of God”, then how could the new be the same as the old? As usual, you won't answer this question, after you were proved wrong. Or you will answer with another question, evading…[Read more]

Quote (Nick Hassan @ July 08 2007,07:19)Hi CO,Scripture please.You have a very short memory for scripture you don't agree with. I had already answered with scripture before. So here it is again,chosenone Group: MembersPosts: 471Joined: Mar. 2007 Posted: July 05 2007,19:22…[Read more]

Paul was called to “complete the word of God”. If it wasn't complete before, how could it be the 'same' gospel?Of course I know I won't recieve an answer, never do when I show you that your are wrong.

Just as I expected, no 'gospel of Nick', or 'eternal gospel' scripture.I'm sure that you must have enough of your own gospel to write your own bible by now.

You keep repeating this “eternal” gospel. Please, please, show some scripture declaring this “eternal gospel”. (I won't hold my breath).

I've answered these questions numerous times. Why keep on asking, you can't seem to understand, just keep going in circles. Forget your 'gospel of Nick', study the scriptures and pray for understanding.

Quote (kejonn @ July 06 2007,08:22)CO,Just for the sake of curiosity, do you no longer lie? Have all lusts fled from you? Do you sometimes say hurtful things to others? Or have you become perfect? I'm not trying to mock you, but trying to figure out wherer you think this repentence does or doesn't belong. Are you speaking of after you accept the…[Read more]

Wrong again, as usual.

We already have, (Ro.6:3). Been there, done that. Read the scripture, you must have missed that.

The 'gospel of Nick” must be new. Existing scripture doesn't mention this 'new gospel' of his.

Quote (Nick Hassan @ July 06 2007,08:05)Hi CO,You seem to be alone in your perceptions here. Perhaps other could help you grasp these things?They could, if they included scripture, though not 'the gospel of Nick', (no scripture needed then)

If Christ has died for my sins, It would be insulting to God to say His Son didn't need to do that, I could do it myself.

Just the'gospel of Nick, is that all we need?

No scripture? Typical.

No scropture? Just 'the gospel of Nick'/

Scripture? I'll bet not! Just more jibberish!

Still no scripture, just the 'gospel of Nick'. Having trouble finding scripture to support your 'truths'?

Truth, very often, is ignored, some prefer the 'gospel of Nick', no scripture is needed.

Yes, every year at the “Day of Atonement”. They had to repent of their sins, and offer a sacifice through the chief priest in the “Holy Of Holys', to cover their sins. Also they had to 'fast' from sunrise to sunset, no food or water. This was done every year, until Jesus' sacifice, then the veil was torn (the one separating the Holy of Holys'),…[Read more]