Quote (thethinker @ June 25 2009,09:59)Quote (SEEKING @ June 26 2009,04:48)Quote (thethinker @ June 19 2009,01:27)Please explain how YHWH can refer to Himself as “US” if He is not a plural entity.So far nobody here has explained anything.thinkerThinker,Help me grasp your train of thought here. If I, with my buddy Joe present, say to you, “Thinker,…[Read more]

Quote (thethinker @ June 19 2009,01:27)Please explain how YHWH can refer to Himself as “US” if He is not a plural entity.So far nobody here has explained anything.thinkerThinker,Help me grasp your train of thought here. If I, with my buddy Joe present, say to you, “Thinker, join US at the ball game”how does that make ME a “plural entity? Plurality…[Read more]

Quote (Stu @ June 25 2009,05:01)StuartQuote There is NO such thing as proof in science.  All you can do is disprove.There you go. Thus, the “Standard Model” becomes the accepted alternative to the Creation Theory. It does NOT disprove the Creation Theory nor does the “Standard Model” prove anything.Quote I will be 'pegged', and happy to admit…[Read more]

Quote (Tim Kraft @ June 25 2009,03:28)So, Stu: If there is no such thing as “facts proven by science” then all the scientific data that you believe is by faith! Right? TKExcellent observation Tim. Stu will state “there is but one correct theory” and then spreak of multiple theroies. He pits his religion against Christianity claiming his is…[Read more]

Take your pick -the⋅o⋅ry  /ˈθiəri, ˈθɪəri/  Show Spelled Pronunciation  Show IPA –noun, plural -ries. 1. a coherent group of general propositions used as principles of explanation for a class of phenomena: Einstein's theory of relativity.  2. a proposed explanation whose status is still conjectural, in contrast to well-established prop…[Read more]

Quote (Cindy @ June 11 2009,18:47)NickBy the time the thieves died, Jesus was already dead.GeorgBut not yet resurrected and ascended to glory. A dead man is not our Savior.

Quote Give me one reason to reject evolution by natural selection that is not just religious special pleading.  And tell me what it has to do with the historicity of the bible?!  I suppose it does show that the bible is wrong / allegorical about human origins.StuartAs I have said before, our bias influences us. You deny bias but your rhetoric d…[Read more]

Archeological EvidenceIt would be extremely difficult for the honest skeptic to dispute the overwhelming archeological support for the historical accuracy of both the Old and New Testaments. Numerous items discussed in the Bible such as nations, important people, customary practices, etc. have been verified by archeological evidence. Bible critics…[Read more]

 Quote Nope.  Not a single one.  There is no eyewitness account of Jesus.You can deny them, as I said, but that does NOT invalidate them.1Co 15:6  Then he appeared to more than five hundred brothers at one time, most of whom are still alive, though some have fallen asleep.1Co 15:7  Then he appeared to James, then to all the apostles.Call Paul a li…[Read more]

Quote (Stu @ June 09 2009,02:03)Yet you have not given me one single example of all this evidence.  Are you saying there is evidence that substantiates some of the historical references in scripture?  None of that validates christianity as a belief system.  Come now! Eye witnesses testified to the death, burial, and resurrection of Jesus. Hi…[Read more]

Quote No, mine are not sacred, they are subject to the appearance of evidence that proves I am wrong.  You have provided no evidence for your god so I shall carry on treating it like any other god.Masses of evidence have been provided over the centuries to substantiate the validity of Christianity. As in a trial, evidence can be ignored and…[Read more]

Quote (Stu @ June 07 2009,01:19)SeekingQuote Thank you for confirming that they recognize their submissions as nonsense. Likewise, I’m sure!Quote You contend for their “nonsense” tenacioiusly knowing it is nonsense. Is this the pathway of intelligent people? You need to be intelligent to understand that the FSM has been demonstrated to be true a…[Read more]

Quote (Stu @ June 06 2009,10:15)The wider point of the Church of the FSM (bhna) is that your nonsense is no better or worse than their nonsense.StuartThank you for confirming that they recognize their submissions as nonsense. You contend for their “nonsense” tenacioiusly knowing it is nonsense. Is this the pathway of intelligent people?It is one…[Read more]

Quote (Stu @ June 06 2009,02:15)It was not invented to make money, but like any new religion there are profits to be made.  You can read all about it in the Holy Wikipedia:http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flying_spaghetti_monsterStuartI see. So your religion has followed the plight of those you condemn. FSM originators, the intelligent developers,…[Read more]

Quote Follow the advice of your beloved Saul of Tarsus in Corinthians and leave the things of childhood behind!Ah yes, I have -as you should.  He and I believe in God.Quote Are you familiar with a long list of debates regarding existence of the Flying Spaghetti Monster? Stu states -Yes, although because the FSM was invented by intelligent people…[Read more]

Quote (Stu @ June 05 2009,05:06)How is your god not exactly as fictional as the FSM (bhna)?StuartStu 5/5/2009Yes of course there is a Flying Spaghetti Monster.Stu,Which is it for you?  You announce, “Yes of course there is a Flying Spaghetti Monster.”  Then you say he his fictional.I announce, “Yes of course there is a God.”  I'll stick with it…[Read more]

Quote (TimothyVI @ June 05 2009,04:21)That is a logical argument.It cannot be proven that the Spaghetti Monster does not exist. Only a fool, therefore, would deny his existence.TimPro 14:33 Wisdom rests in the heart of a man of understanding, but it makes itself known even in the midst of fools. 1Co 1:20 Where is the one who is wise? Where is…[Read more]

Quote (Stu @ June 05 2009,01:56)Quote (SEEKING @ June 05 2009,02:08)Quote (Stu @ June 04 2009,02:30)Quote (SEEKING @ June 04 2009,09:40)Quote (Stu @ May 28 2009,06:06)Give me one fact you know beyond reasonable doubt about the god you worship, something that would be perverse for anyone to deny.  PS 53:1 The fool says in his heart,    “There is no…[Read more]

Quote (Stu @ June 04 2009,02:30)Quote (SEEKING @ June 04 2009,09:40)Quote (Stu @ May 28 2009,06:06)Give me one fact you know beyond reasonable doubt about the god you worship, something that would be perverse for anyone to deny.  PS 53:1 The fool says in his heart,    “There is no God.”Reason this is fact is the statement:Quote Science cannot pr…[Read more]

Quote (Stu @ May 28 2009,06:06)Give me one fact you know beyond reasonable doubt about the god you worship, something that would be perverse for anyone to deny.  PS 53:1 The fool says in his heart, “There is no God.”Reason this is fact is the statement:Quote Science cannot prove a negative