Quote This narrative shows that it is human nature to worry and that Jesus never worried. If Jesus never worried then He did not have a human nature. ALL THOSE WITH A HUMAN NATURE MUST WORRY.Can we make this same application of grief and sorrow?If not, why not?Mat 26:38 Then he said to them, “My soul is very sorrowful, ] even to death; remain…[Read more]

Quote (thethinker @ Mar. 16 2009,09:36)Quote (SEEKING @ Mar. 16 2009,09:04)Quote (thethinker @ Mar. 15 2009,11:41)Quote Man is a plural unity. Man is called both “him” (singular) and “them” (plural).  So God is also called “Him” and “Us”. Another vastily inaccurate statement!Gen 1:27  So God created man (adam – singular) in his own image, in t…[Read more]

Quote (thethinker @ Mar. 09 2009,16:42)Quote In other words, to walk in the flesh is to serve the law according to the letter. But to walk in the Spirit is to serve the law according to the spirit.SCRIPTURE DEFINES WHAT THE WALK IS AND THE FRUITS OF WALKING IN THE FLESH VS. WALKING IN THE SPIRIT.Gal 5:16 But I say, walk by the Spirit, and you…[Read more]

Quote (thethinker @ Mar. 16 2009,01:09)Seeking said:Quote Wrong again!  You proved, by admission, that you think like Apolliniarius.  I believe I would be correct that he hadthe thoughts long before you did.  No man tells me what to believe?  Is Appolinarius female?Seeking,I originally said that no one tells me or dictates to me how to think. I i…[Read more]

Quote (thethinker @ Mar. 15 2009,16:35)Seeking wrote:What part of the information is not accurate regarding what Apploinarian taught and you say you believe?Thinker responded: “You should have said, “…Catholic Church or not may have reported accurately.” You made a pre-judgment”Wrong once again. You report no part of the information as…[Read more]

Quote (thethinker @ Mar. 15 2009,15:09)Non-trinitarians just can't give a uniform explanation.thinkerTrinitarians and others claim that the Hebrew noun ‘Elohim’, rendered ‘God’ (Strong’s #430) in the first clause of Genesis 1:26, denotes more than one God Person (typically thought of or explained as “3 in 1” or “2 in 1” as in “one” family). In…[Read more]

Quote (Gene @ Mar. 15 2009,11:40)thinker………..as i said before Logos (WORD) can not ever (BE)Flesh, (it) can only come to dwell in flesh. peace and love to you and yoursAppolinaris taught –Therefore it followed that the Logos assumed only a body and its closely connected sensitive soul. The Logos or Word himself took the place of the rational…[Read more]

Quote (thethinker @ Mar. 15 2009,10:57)Quote (SEEKING @ Mar. 16 2009,01:44)Quote (thethinker @ Mar. 14 2009,02:29)Quote my particular view of the trinity is Apollinarian which is considered heresy by trinitarians.ApollinarianismGeneral Information Apollinarianism was a heretical doctrine taught by Apollinaris the Younger, bishop of Laodicea in…[Read more]

Quote (thethinker @ Mar. 15 2009,11:41)Quote Man is a plural unity. Man is called both “him” (singular) and “them” (plural). So God is also called “Him” and “Us”. Another vastily inaccurate statement!Gen 1:27 So God created man (adam – singular) in his own image, in the image of God he created him; male and female ( the two sexes of adam) he…[Read more]

Quote (thethinker @ Mar. 14 2009,02:29)Quote my particular view of the trinity is Apollinarian which is considered heresy by trinitarians.ApollinarianismGeneral Information Apollinarianism was a heretical doctrine taught by Apollinaris the Younger, bishop of Laodicea in Syria during the 4th century. A controversial theologian, he maintained that…[Read more]

Quote In other words, non-trinitarians have no coherent or uniform way of treating the plural “elohim.”Quote What you all need to do is to get together and conduct a private conference and decide on one uniform interpretation. Then come back and speak with one voice and challenge me.Trinitarians and others claim that the Hebrew noun ‘Elohim’, ren…[Read more]

Quote (Cindy @ Mar. 14 2009,16:35)KathiSorry Marty I am still confused in what you wrote! Do you or don't you believe that there is a supreme being? You know that there is, but don't believe? IreneQuote I just don't believe that there is a supreme being. I know this for a factAllow me toe-write this for Marty. I believe this is what he is…[Read more]

Quote (Cindy @ Mar. 14 2009,16:35)KathiSorry Marty I am still confused in what you wrote! Do you or don't you believe that there is a supreme being? You know that there is, but don't believe? IreneQuote I just don't believe that there is a supreme being.  I know this for a factAllow me to re-write this for Marty.  I believe this is what he is s…[Read more]

Quote (thethinker @ Mar. 13 2009,20:31)Seeking said:Quote Simply holding an insight different than yours does not reflect a lack of seeking.  In fact, seeking is how one sees past your “therefores” etc.To All,Failure to reply does not constitute “insight.” I have pointed out several times now that Jesus said that the priests “profaned” the…[Read more]

Quote (thethinker @ Mar. 13 2009,17:00)Quote I have gone out of my way to be balanced in my view. Yet you insist on twisting my words.I twist and twisted nothing. I cited a text and added the word “ergo” at the end. If that is twisting then you twisted someones words when you did likewise. Again, Ridiculous!Quote Please live up to your…[Read more]

Quote (thethinker @ Mar. 13 2009,15:56)Quote Colossians 1:17 says:All things were created by Him and for Him Please, what version are you citing?Col 1:17 KJV And he is before all things, and by him all things consist. Col 1:17 ESV And he is before all things, and in him all things hold together. Col 1:17 YLT and himself is before all, and the…[Read more]

Quote thethinker,Mar. 13 2009,12:12Seeking said: Thinker, I made only one point in my post,  David did not violate the SabbathThinkers response – It doesn't matter.Thinker,It only matters when you say David did break the sabbath.You confuse readers by making statements not true to the word – twisting the word!thinker said: Here's a thought! God…[Read more]

Quote (thethinker @ Mar. 13 2009,10:41)Quote Thinker said:Jesus said that what king David and the priests did was “unlawful” and that they “profaned” the sabbath (vss. 3-8). Seeking replied:David did not violate the Sabbath in this instance. He violated the edict that only Aaron and his sons, priests, were to eat the bread.Thinker responded:But…[Read more]

Quote Hey Gene bro! You and Apollanaruis are in agreement. Yet Apollanarius was a Trinitarian and you are not. Go figure!thinkerThinker asked, “If the “Word” in verse 14 is not Jesus, then who is it?”Gene responded, “thinker………. You said if the word did not reference Jesus then who does it reference, it references the expressed intellect of…[Read more]

Quote (thethinker @ Mar. 13 2009,01:40)Quote Jesus said that what king David and the priests did was “unlawful” and that they “profaned” the sabbath (vss. 3-8). Mat 12:3-4 He said to them, “Have you not read what David did when he was hungry, and those who were with him: how he entered the house of God and ate the bread of the Presence, which…[Read more]