Constitutionalist replied to the topic Who was job's advocate? in the forum Scriptural Teachings 16 years, 5 months ago
Quote (Nick Hassan @ Oct. 03 2009,16:57)Hi, In the NIV on this site an alternative reading is offered for verse 20″MY FRIENDS TREAT ME WITH SCORN” so there may be manuscript variation.Even your suggestion that the NIV in this site is closer than the NIV he quoted in the very first post in this topic thread.Thank you for offering that.
Constitutionalist replied to the topic Who was job's advocate? in the forum Scriptural Teachings 16 years, 5 months ago
Quote (thethinker @ Oct. 03 2009,10:00)Constitutionalist said:Quote Yes you are correct that in most parts of God does stick up for Job. And Job knew that YHWH (Jesus) was sticking up for him. So why would Job “yearn” to have an Advocate when he already had the best lawyer in town?thinkerFirst of all, the writings of Job were not written by…[Read more]
Constitutionalist replied to the topic Left behind in the forum Prophecy 16 years, 5 months ago
Quote (georg @ Sep. 22 2009,07:01)Quote (Tim Kraft @ Sep. 23 2009,01:03)There is no so called god of this world for me other than the God of Jesus. Deceivers. liers, and devils of deception shall never be my God. I serve only the God of Jesus and I serve him by faith. Bless you, TK——-and I am a child of God!Tim When it says God of this…[Read more]
Constitutionalist replied to the topic Who was job's advocate? in the forum Scriptural Teachings 16 years, 5 months ago
Quote (t8 @ Oct. 03 2009,02:41)Quote (Is 1:18 @ Oct. 03 2009,20:43)Quote (thethinker @ Oct. 03 2009,20:24)Quote (Is 1:18 @ Oct. 03 2009,13:03)I think these Genesis passages are problematic for the Arians. as they quite patently state that YHWH was seen. Yet the NT is just as emphatic in stating that The Father hasn't been seen….Hey Is. 1:18,It…[Read more]
Constitutionalist replied to the topic Who was job's advocate? in the forum Scriptural Teachings 16 years, 5 months ago
Quote (thethinker @ Oct. 03 2009,00:57)Constitutionalist said:Quote The “NIV” makes it look like something is being done on Job's behalf, where as the “KJV” shows that it is something JOB yearns for, pretty big difference.Now, I pray I offended no one, but this is what I gleaned from these verses.Const,The problem with what you say here is that…[Read more]
Constitutionalist replied to the topic The ransom in the forum Scriptural Teachings 16 years, 5 months ago
Quote (georg @ Sep. 25 2009,11:34)From what I have heard, and from what I have read here on the forum, there seems to be a great misunderstanding of Jesus’ ransom.How does Jesus ransom effect us?Why did Jesus say;” he came to ransom many?” (Math. 20:28), and Paul says :” he gave himself a ransom for all” (1 Tim. 2:6), is Paul contradic…[Read more]
Constitutionalist replied to the topic in the forum The Trinity Doctrine 16 years, 5 months ago
Quote (georg @ Oct. 02 2009,19:48)Quote (Constitutionalist @ Oct. 03 2009,14:22)Quote (Gene @ Oct. 02 2009,08:55)Constitutionalist…………is it OK if we call you CT for short?……………….Welcome to the site and your perceptions are right, What you will find here a lot is when things are put forth in soundness with scriptures, along…[Read more]
Constitutionalist replied to the topic Who was job's advocate? in the forum Scriptural Teachings 16 years, 5 months ago
Quote (thethinker @ Sep. 25 2009,08:02)Job 16:19-21 says:19 Even NOW my witness is in heaven; my Advocate is on high. 20 My Intercessor IS my friend as my eyes pour out tears to God; 21 on behalf of a man He pleads with God as a man pleads for his friend. NIVHeaven Net friends,Jesus Christ pre-existed His birth. Note tha…[Read more]
Constitutionalist replied to the topic in the forum The Trinity Doctrine 16 years, 5 months ago
Quote (Gene @ Oct. 02 2009,08:55)Constitutionalist…………is it OK if we call you CT for short?……………….Welcome to the site and your perceptions are right, What you will find here a lot is when things are put forth in soundness with scriptures, along comes these deluded TRINITARIANS, and start to muddy the waters up with their…[Read more]
Constitutionalist replied to the topic in the forum The Trinity Doctrine 16 years, 5 months ago
Quote (RokkaMan @ Sep. 16 2009,09:14)Quote (eveh @ Sep. 16 2009,17:54)1 Timothy 5.21I charge thee before God, and the Lord Jesus Christ, and the elect angels, that thou observe these things without preferring one before another, doing nothing by partiality. If there were a Trinity composed of three co-equal, co-eternal “persons,” why would Paul…[Read more]

