Constitutionalist replied to the topic in the forum The Holy Spirit, a separate person, essence of God, or force? 14 years, 10 months ago
Quote (terraricca @ Dec. 16 2009,21:32)hi GeneRev 19:10 And I fell at his feet to worship him. And he said unto me, See thou do it not: I am thy fellow-servant, and of thy brethren that have the testimony of Jesus: worship God: for the testimony of Jesus is the spirit of prophecy. how would you interpret this (spirit) in this verse ???The Usage…[Read more]
Constitutionalist replied to the topic Be born again in the forum Inspirational writings & sermons 14 years, 10 months ago
Quote (terraricca @ Dec. 16 2009,21:39)hi nickyou know the holy grail is an oaks ,it was made around 15century ,other wise yes you rightYou mean the holy grail isn't jesus daughter like in that movie?
Constitutionalist replied to the topic Sharp's rule…. in the forum Truth or Tradition 14 years, 10 months ago
Quote (kerwin @ Dec. 17 2009,02:56)Tim Kraft wrote:Quote And the religion of the old testament was in darkness and sin. The reason Jesus had to come was to show the correct way to God and enlighten the path. The old testament was full of all sorts of hate, killing, and destruction done in the name of their gods. I don't see that as an example of…[Read more]
Constitutionalist replied to the topic Sharp's rule…. in the forum Truth or Tradition 14 years, 10 months ago
Quote (Tim Kraft @ Dec. 17 2009,02:48)Quote (Constitutionalist @ Dec. 17 2009,21:19)Quote (thethinker @ Dec. 17 2009,02:05)David said:Quote So compare the KJV rendering of Titus 2:13 (which “treats `God' and `Savior' separately”) with that of 2 Peter 1:1, KJV.The KJV says:Quote Simon Peter, a servant and an apostle of Jesus Christ, to them t…[Read more]
Constitutionalist replied to the topic The Nature of Angels in the forum Scriptural Teachings 14 years, 11 months ago
Quote (karmarie @ Dec. 17 2009,02:19)I believe God has wingsAnd that every person has a Gaurdian Angel Does he have cheesy bread and a free liter of pepsi too?
Constitutionalist replied to the topic Sharp's rule…. in the forum Truth or Tradition 14 years, 11 months ago
Quote (kerwin @ Dec. 17 2009,02:19)I have heard that Calvin Winstanley, as Trinitarian, has demonstrated that Sharp's rule did not apply consistently in Greek if you included more examples than those provided by Grandville Sharp. That makes it sound like Mr. Sharp shaped his evidence to fit his conclusion.One must also concede that there are…[Read more]
Constitutionalist replied to the topic Sharp's rule…. in the forum Truth or Tradition 14 years, 11 months ago
Quote (thethinker @ Dec. 17 2009,02:05)David said:Quote So compare the KJV rendering of Titus 2:13 (which “treats `God' and `Savior' separately”) with that of 2 Peter 1:1, KJV.The KJV says:Quote Simon Peter, a servant and an apostle of Jesus Christ, to them that have obtained like precious faith with us through the righteousness of God and o…[Read more]
Constitutionalist replied to the topic Melchizedek in the forum View Points 14 years, 11 months ago
Quote (t8 @ Dec. 17 2009,02:07)Oh great, at least you had a laugh. Pity about the coffee. Might need to order another one. A coffee in the morning is very important.I would like to have a Mocha, but I am off to bed now and would never sleep if I pumped in some caffeine now. (It is 11.00pm here.)BTW: I can move the topic if you want.I work in a…[Read more]
Constitutionalist replied to the topic Melchizedek in the forum Truth or Tradition 14 years, 11 months ago
Quote (t8 @ Dec. 17 2009,02:07)Oh great, at least you had a laugh. Pity about the coffee. Might need to order another one. A coffee in the morning is very important.I would like to have a Mocha, but I am off to bed now and would never sleep if I pumped in some caffeine now. (It is 11.00pm here.)BTW: I can move the topic if you want.I work in a…[Read more]
Constitutionalist replied to the topic Sharp's rule…. in the forum Truth or Tradition 14 years, 11 months ago
Quote (thethinker @ Dec. 17 2009,01:41)Quote (Constitutionalist @ Dec. 17 2009,18:30)Quote (thethinker @ Dec. 16 2009,18:54)David wrote:Quote Also, 1 Tim. 6:13 is translated in trinitarian Bibles as: “before (in the sight or presence of) God … and before Christ Jesus….” Although Sharp's Rule insists that this should be translated to show…[Read more]
Constitutionalist replied to the topic The antichrist in the forum Prophecy 14 years, 11 months ago
The Anti-Christ is here! Ask T8, he will confirm it! The Anti-Christ is hiding across Skeptics Bridge, seeking whom he may devour!The Anti-Christ is here! Ask T8, he will confirm it! The Anti-Christ is hiding across Skeptics Bridge, seeking whom he may devour!The Anti-Christ is here! Ask T8, he will confirm it! The Anti-Christ is hiding across…[Read more]
Constitutionalist replied to the topic Sharp's rule…. in the forum Truth or Tradition 14 years, 11 months ago
Quote (t8 @ Dec. 17 2009,01:02)Quote (david @ Dec. 17 2009,12:21)The 5 “proofs” of Jesus' Godhood according to Sharp are (in the literal wording of the original manuscripts):(a) Titus 2:13:”of the great God and savior of us Christ Jesus” tou megalou qeou kai sothroV hmwn cristou Ihsou(b) 2 Pet…[Read more]
Constitutionalist replied to the topic WISDOM in the forum Scriptural Teachings 14 years, 11 months ago
And I fell at His feet to worship him. And he said unto me, See thou do it not: I am thy fellowservant, and of thy brethren that have the testimony of Yeshua HaMoshiach: worship 'Elohim!: Rev 19:10Now, John like so many people, we want to worship the instrument that 'Elohim uses to bring His knowledge or love or grace to us. One of the great…[Read more]
Constitutionalist replied to the topic WISDOM in the forum Scriptural Teachings 14 years, 11 months ago
Quote (terraricca @ Dec. 16 2009,21:45)hi GeneRev 19:10 And I fell at his feet to worship him. And he said unto me, See thou do it not: I am thy fellowservant, and of thy brethren that have the testimony of Jesus: worship God: for the testimony of Jesus is the spirit of prophecy. what do you think the (spirit )means in this verse ?????Spirit of…[Read more]
Constitutionalist replied to the topic 10 commandments; were they done away with? in the forum Scriptural Teachings 14 years, 11 months ago
Quote (Nick Hassan @ Dec. 17 2009,00:32)Hi CON, The pharisees could not read between the lines and dwelled on fulfilling the restrictions missing the vital love written there.Has nothing to do with Pharisees, It has to do with scripture and your statement. It's ok. Skirt it all you wish.
Constitutionalist replied to the topic 10 commandments; were they done away with? in the forum Scriptural Teachings 14 years, 11 months ago
Quote (Nick Hassan @ Dec. 16 2009,23:58)Hi CON, You cannot let go of the Jewish law?Love is relevant and killing becomes impossible.Can't let go what 'elohim places in the heart, and is backed by scripture, but apparently you can.
Constitutionalist replied to the topic 10 commandments; were they done away with? in the forum Scriptural Teachings 14 years, 11 months ago
Quote (Nick Hassan @ Dec. 16 2009,23:58)Hi CON, You cannot let go of the Jewish law?Love is relevant and killing becomes impossible.Nick can't accept scriptual proof? Staying in denial? Truth will set you free.
Constitutionalist replied to the topic 10 commandments; were they done away with? in the forum Scriptural Teachings 14 years, 11 months ago
Nothing wrong with being corrected, humbleness is a virtue from 'elohim.
Constitutionalist replied to the topic 10 commandments; were they done away with? in the forum Scriptural Teachings 14 years, 11 months ago
Quote (Nick Hassan @ Dec. 16 2009,23:43)Hi CON,Do you really you think THOU SHALT NOT KILL is written on your heart? Love is so much more relevant.Absolutly, it is written in you your heart not to kill, just like to love and sanctify life is written on your heart.Like I said, I showed you scripture showing the OT law is written on your heart, and…[Read more]
Constitutionalist replied to the topic The 14 commandments of the jw’s; are there really in the forum Truth or Tradition 14 years, 11 months ago
Quote (terraricca @ Dec. 16 2009,21:20)hi Ed jthe #4 is not to be applied if you are a Christian. #9 refers to the JW telling everyone 1975 is the end and the beginning of the 1000years of Christ reign.this sins 1964 until 1973 when the admitted that it never going to happen.but the had increased in numbers because many trusted them.this could…[Read more]
- Load More