Hi A7,The Spirit is the “finger of God”As such that Spirit,though it is all over the world, infusing the creation of God and endowing saved men with His own nature and power-that Spirit is still in continuity with God, who is Spirit. So not a person then…

Hi Nick,I am not too sure I see a difference in those verses… both say proceeds from in reality. (One just takes four extra words to get there ;)But what I do think is interesting in this verse is the way Jesus says in question… who God is: If “God” were your {Father} – how does that equate to a Trinity?Not to sure how you come to this…[Read more]

Is 1:18 When you have time… i do understand.

Quote (Is 1:18 @ May 19 2006,22:27)I don't think The Son is “higher” than the Father, or vise versa, in their substance/nature/essence…..would I be arguing for ontological Co equality if I thought that the Son was a higher class of being than the Father?? Hardly.'Elyon' is a name of God – Highest One. This is a fact.Hi Is 1:18,Can I ask you how…[Read more]

Hey Guys,How do i quote then reply and then quote again as Is 1:18 has done in his reply to my questions…Thanks

Hey Rudy,Jesus was given all power by the Father, how does that make him the ultimate controller of all things.

Quote (Is 1:18 @ May 19 2006,11:30)“Great God” – Titus 2:13″First and Last” – Revelation 1:17, 2:8….”Alpha and Omega” – Revelation 22:13and my personal favourite……”Most High” – Dan 7:18, 22, 25, 27.Hey Is 1:18How is Most High in relation to Jesus. I don't see it in those verses. How do you see it is Jesus? The Ancient of Days pronounces in…[Read more]

Thanks Is 1:18Not easy stuff is it… 😉

Micah 5:2″But you, Bethlehem Ephrathah, though you are small among the clans of Judah, out of you will come for me one who will be ruler over Israel, whose origins are from of old, from ancient times.”This is an interesting one… will look at that! ThanksJude 1:25to the only God our Savior be glory, majesty, power and authority, through Jesus…[Read more]

Quote (t8 @ May 17 2006,06:54)First off there is an article before the word LOGOS, which is used to denote a person. Secondly Jesus is called the LOGOS OF GOD in the Book of Revelation. Are we to suppose that he is now just a spoken word of God? Or is he still a person?Explain this please…But it is not as though the word of God has failed. For…[Read more]

Thanks T8Some interesting scriptures to think about… will look at those later…

Get real 😉 hehe, I like it Nick, sounds like a coca cola ad…You Quote: His first move was to beget a son who does everything in the name of the Father. – Where Nick, you tell me where does it state this… where was he begotten ? One Scripture is all I need.Nick I am not fighting I am digging and will continue to do so – I want to know what…[Read more]

Sammo,I came across this and thought that you would find it an interesting read on the validity of the LXX …. Why cant it be straight forward eh … changes, additions, deletions (is that a word) in words, phrases, chapter, content, book order all make for an endless task of serious digging… bring on the JCB's.The Shape of the SeptuagintThe…[Read more]

How do you reconcile the words of Jesus in Matthew 19:4 & Mark 10:6? His words are direct, straight forward – From the beginning – GOD made male and female… cf Gen 1 In the Beginning GOD…He is not saying in the beginning, God made male and female through an Eternal Son.. Jesus is direct yet not once does he mention he made the heavens and the…[Read more]

Quote (Nick Hassan @ May 16 2006,20:32)Do you agree?Indeed Artizan 7, The SON through whom He made the World.How can this be?Hey Nick,I will try to answer to the best of my understanding as I keep looking ;)The word for “world” should be “ages” – it is plural of aionThe Greek word translated “universe” (or “world” in many translations) is the plu…[Read more]

Yes Elisabeth did?Did Mary conceive Jesus? – How so…

Nick,We are dust… and have the life of God breathed into us… but not one of us existed before our time…To the subject:How is what you believe about Jesus', so called “conception” in Mary too different from the Trinity's incarnation, apart from the fact you say it was the Pre-existent Word and not a pre-existent 2nd Person of the Godhead that…[Read more]

En arxh hn (5713) o logov, kai o logov hn (5713) prov ton qeon, kai qeov hn (5713) o logov. Or could it say, in the beginning was the word and the word was with God and divine was the word.John 1:1 In the beginning was the Word , and the Word was with God , and the Word was God .Can anyone tell me what the 4 3588 numbers are for at…[Read more]

En arxh hn (5713) o logov, kai o logov hn (5713) prov ton qeon, kai qeov hn (5713) o logov.Why do we translate it “and the Word was God”, should it not be “and God was the Word”…

In the geneologies of Jesus, Matthew and Luke; Why is only Adam called the son of God. Jesus himself was not given this title, but son of David and Son of Joseph (as was supposed) – did they even have parenthesis in those days, or did some scribe insert his thoughts in later – hehe? it is a strange way to write. Why not just write the truth and…[Read more]