- This topic is empty.
- Posts
Quote (Stu @ Sep. 28 2010,12:57) Do you mean precede or proceed? Stuart
Hi Stuart,Proceed
God bless
Ed J
http://www.holycitybiblecode.orgQuote (Stu @ Sep. 25 2010,19:50) Indeed there is no IQ required for the complete explanation of the emergence of the diversity of life. Why are you suggesting there is?
Ha ha ha.IQ zero. And the designs are so great that our greatest scientists stand in awe of them and learn from them.
Quote (t8 @ Sep. 30 2010,14:53) Quote (Stu @ Sep. 25 2010,19:50) Indeed there is no IQ required for the complete explanation of the emergence of the diversity of life. Why are you suggesting there is?
Ha ha ha.IQ zero. And the designs are so great that our greatest scientists stand in awe of them and learn from them.
Sorry, didn't see an explanation for why you are insisting on some kind of intelligence. What does it do? How does it fit into what we observe? What does it explain?Stuart
Quote (Stu @ Sep. 30 2010,17:02) Quote (t8 @ Sep. 30 2010,14:53) Quote (Stu @ Sep. 25 2010,19:50) Indeed there is no IQ required for the complete explanation of the emergence of the diversity of life. Why are you suggesting there is?
Ha ha ha.IQ zero. And the designs are so great that our greatest scientists stand in awe of them and learn from them.
Sorry, didn't see an explanation for why you are insisting on some kind of intelligence. What does it do? How does it fit into what we observe? What does it explain?Stuart
Hi Stuart,Are you trying to illustrate this zero IQ?
Quote (Ed J @ Sep. 30 2010,18:28) Quote (Stu @ Sep. 30 2010,17:02) Quote (t8 @ Sep. 30 2010,14:53) Quote (Stu @ Sep. 25 2010,19:50) Indeed there is no IQ required for the complete explanation of the emergence of the diversity of life. Why are you suggesting there is?
Ha ha ha.IQ zero. And the designs are so great that our greatest scientists stand in awe of them and learn from them.
Sorry, didn't see an explanation for why you are insisting on some kind of intelligence. What does it do? How does it fit into what we observe? What does it explain?Stuart
Hi Stuart,Are you trying to illustrate this zero IQ?
More beating about the bush Ed? What exactly are you trying to say?Stuart
Quote (Stu @ Sep. 30 2010,19:02) Quote (Ed J @ Sep. 30 2010,18:28) Quote (Stu @ Sep. 30 2010,17:02) Quote (t8 @ Sep. 30 2010,14:53) Quote (Stu @ Sep. 25 2010,19:50) Indeed there is no IQ required for the complete explanation of the emergence of the diversity of life. Why are you suggesting there is?
Ha ha ha.IQ zero. And the designs are so great that our greatest scientists stand in awe of them and learn from them.
Sorry, didn't see an explanation for why you are insisting on some kind of intelligence. What does it do? How does it fit into what we observe? What does it explain?Stuart
Hi Stuart,Are you trying to illustrate this zero IQ?
More beating about the bush Ed? What exactly are you trying to say?Stuart
Hi Stuart,You said: 'Indeed there is no IQ required for the complete explanation of the emergence of the diversity of life.'
Sorry if I sound too cynical for you in my explanation to your question, but you asked…
Ah, um, duh, um; I guess it just happened ? ? ? <– Zero IQ!
Ed J (Joshua 22:34)
http://www.holycitybiblecode.orgQuote (Ed J @ Sep. 30 2010,19:15) Quote (Stu @ Sep. 30 2010,19:02) Quote (Ed J @ Sep. 30 2010,18:28) Quote (Stu @ Sep. 30 2010,17:02) Quote (t8 @ Sep. 30 2010,14:53) Quote (Stu @ Sep. 25 2010,19:50) Indeed there is no IQ required for the complete explanation of the emergence of the diversity of life. Why are you suggesting there is?
Ha ha ha.IQ zero. And the designs are so great that our greatest scientists stand in awe of them and learn from them.
Sorry, didn't see an explanation for why you are insisting on some kind of intelligence. What does it do? How does it fit into what we observe? What does it explain?Stuart
Hi Stuart,Are you trying to illustrate this zero IQ?
More beating about the bush Ed? What exactly are you trying to say?Stuart
Hi Stuart,You said: 'Indeed there is no IQ required for the complete explanation of the emergence of the diversity of life.'
Sorry if I sound too cynical for you in my explanation to your question, but you asked…
Ah, um, duh, um; I guess it just happened ? ? ? <– Zero IQ!
Ed J (Joshua 22:34)
http://www.holycitybiblecode.org
Yes it just happened. Why should it not have?Stuart
Quote (Stu @ Sep. 30 2010,19:22) Quote (Ed J @ Sep. 30 2010,19:15) Quote (Stu @ Sep. 30 2010,19:02) Quote (Ed J @ Sep. 30 2010,18:28) Quote (Stu @ Sep. 30 2010,17:02) Quote (t8 @ Sep. 30 2010,14:53) Quote (Stu @ Sep. 25 2010,19:50) Indeed there is no IQ required for the complete explanation of the emergence of the diversity of life. Why are you suggesting there is?
Ha ha ha.IQ zero. And the designs are so great that our greatest scientists stand in awe of them and learn from them.
Sorry, didn't see an explanation for why you are insisting on some kind of intelligence. What does it do? How does it fit into what we observe? What does it explain?Stuart
Hi Stuart,Are you trying to illustrate this zero IQ?
More beating about the bush Ed? What exactly are you trying to say?Stuart
Hi Stuart,You said: 'Indeed there is no IQ required for the complete explanation of the emergence of the diversity of life.'
Sorry if I sound too cynical for you in my explanation to your question, but you asked…
Ah, um, duh, um; I guess it just happened ? ? ? <– Zero IQ!
Ed J (Joshua 22:34)
http://www.holycitybiblecode.org
Yes it just happened. Why should it not have?Stuart
Hi Stuart,It is a Scientific FACT that Life begets Life! (John 1:3-4)
1Tm.6:20-21 O Timothy, keep that which is committed to thy trust,
avoiding profane and vain babblings, and oppositions of science falsely so called:
Which some professing have erred concerning the faith. Grace be with thee. Amen.Jer.2:27 Saying to a stock, Thou art my father; and to a stone, Thou hast brought me forth:
for they have turned their back unto me, and not their face: but in the time
of their trouble they will say, Arise (God), and save us.Ed J (Joshua 22:34)
http://www.holycitybiblecode.orgQuote (Ed J @ Sep. 30 2010,19:35) It is a Scientific FACT that Life begets Life! (John 1:3-4)
Indeed it is, which means Genesis 2:7 must be wrong.Stuart
Quote (Stu @ Oct. 01 2010,10:06) Quote (Ed J @ Sep. 30 2010,19:35) It is a Scientific FACT that Life begets Life! (John 1:3-4)
Indeed it is, which means Genesis 2:7 must be wrong.Stuart
Hi Stuart,No; it means your evilution is wrong.
Life was in God, an essential Scientific component for Life; Life begets Life!
John 1:3-5 All things were made by him(YHVH); and without him(YHVH) was not any thing
made that was made. In him(YHVH) was life; and the life was the light of men.
And the light shineth in darkness; and the darkness comprehended it not.Ed J (Joshua 22:34)
http://www.holycitybiblecode.orgThe biological definition of life includes factors such as cellular composition, need for nutrition, ability to reproduce, conversion of energy by respiration, and excretion.
Does your god conform to the biological definition of life?
Stuart
Quote (Stu @ Oct. 01 2010,11:41) The biological definition of life includes factors such as cellular composition, need for nutrition, ability to reproduce, conversion of energy by respiration, and excretion. Does your god conform to the biological definition of life?
Stuart
Hi Stuart,John 1:3 says that life was in him.
Why are you trying to 'spin' it into saying he was life?
Those are two completely different things.No wonder you have such trouble understanding “The Bible”,
comprehension is a necessary facet to understanding it's wisdom!Ed J (Joshua 22:34)
http://www.holycitybiblecode.orgQuote (Ed J @ Oct. 01 2010,11:59) Quote (Stu @ Oct. 01 2010,11:41) The biological definition of life includes factors such as cellular composition, need for nutrition, ability to reproduce, conversion of energy by respiration, and excretion. Does your god conform to the biological definition of life?
Stuart
Hi Stuart,John 1:3 says that life was in him.
Why are you trying to 'spin' it into saying he was life?
Those are two completely different things.No wonder you have such trouble understanding “The Bible”,
comprehension is a necessary facet to understanding it's wisdom!Ed J (Joshua 22:34)
http://www.holycitybiblecode.org
It's not me spinning. You said life comes from life. Does your god have biological life or not?Stuart
Quote (Stu @ Oct. 01 2010,12:53) Quote (Ed J @ Oct. 01 2010,11:59) Quote (Stu @ Oct. 01 2010,11:41) The biological definition of life includes factors such as cellular composition, need for nutrition, ability to reproduce, conversion of energy by respiration, and excretion. Does your god conform to the biological definition of life?
Stuart
Hi Stuart,John 1:3 says that life was in him.
Why are you trying to 'spin' it into saying he was life?
Those are two completely different things.No wonder you have such trouble understanding “The Bible”,
comprehension is a necessary facet to understanding it's wisdom!Ed J (Joshua 22:34)
http://www.holycitybiblecode.org
It's not me spinning. You said life comes from life. Does your god have biological life or not?Stuart
Hi Stuart,The wording is in English, you do understand English; No?
Ed J (Joshua 22:34)
http://www.holycitybiblecode.orgQuote (Ed J @ Oct. 01 2010,13:39) Quote (Stu @ Oct. 01 2010,12:53) Quote (Ed J @ Oct. 01 2010,11:59) Quote (Stu @ Oct. 01 2010,11:41) The biological definition of life includes factors such as cellular composition, need for nutrition, ability to reproduce, conversion of energy by respiration, and excretion. Does your god conform to the biological definition of life?
Stuart
Hi Stuart,John 1:3 says that life was in him.
Why are you trying to 'spin' it into saying he was life?
Those are two completely different things.No wonder you have such trouble understanding “The Bible”,
comprehension is a necessary facet to understanding it's wisdom!Ed J (Joshua 22:34)
http://www.holycitybiblecode.org
It's not me spinning. You said life comes from life. Does your god have biological life or not?Stuart
Hi Stuart,The wording is in English, you do understand English; No?
Ed J (Joshua 22:34)
http://www.holycitybiblecode.org
The wording is archaic. “Life in…” someone means they are not dead. That does not answer the question. Does your god respire, and thus qualify as the life that begets other life, or is your god a “spirit” and therefore not a form of biological life? If so, the creationist hypothesis that your spirit Friend breathed into dirt to make life is not consistent with life begetting life: the only model that does fit life begetting life is one where the first cell that replicated would be called life, and its appearance was not an act of begetting (or reproduction).Stuart
Quote (Stu @ Oct. 01 2010,14:25) Quote (Ed J @ Oct. 01 2010,13:39) Quote (Stu @ Oct. 01 2010,12:53) Quote (Ed J @ Oct. 01 2010,11:59) Quote (Stu @ Oct. 01 2010,11:41) The biological definition of life includes factors such as cellular composition, need for nutrition, ability to reproduce, conversion of energy by respiration, and excretion. Does your god conform to the biological definition of life?
Stuart
Hi Stuart,John 1:3 says that life was in him.
Why are you trying to 'spin' it into saying he was life?
Those are two completely different things.No wonder you have such trouble understanding “The Bible”,
comprehension is a necessary facet to understanding it's wisdom!Ed J (Joshua 22:34)
http://www.holycitybiblecode.org
It's not me spinning. You said life comes from life. Does your god have biological life or not?Stuart
Hi Stuart,The wording is in English, you do understand English; No?
Ed J (Joshua 22:34)
http://www.holycitybiblecode.org
The wording is archaic. “Life in…” someone means they are not dead. That does not answer the question. Does your god respire, and thus qualify as the life that begets other life, or is your god a “spirit” and therefore not a form of biological life? If so, the creationist hypothesis that your spirit Friend breathed into dirt to make life is not consistent with life begetting life: the only model that does fit life begetting life is one where the first cell that replicated would be called life, and its appearance was not an act of begetting (or reproduction).Stuart
Hi Stuart,Do you follow pre-fabbed attack strategies from an Atheist site?
Because, you certainly don't pay attention to the illustrated Facts!
No wonder you're so gullible and naive as to swallow the lie of evilution!Let me tell you in a way that you can understand; Stuart.
The Earth has life in it; does that mean that the Earth is alive?Witnessing to a worldwide audience in behalf of YHVH!
יהוה האלהים (JEHOVAH GOD) YÄ-hä-vā hä ĔL-ō-Hêêm!
Ed J (Joshua 22:34 / Isaiah 49:16 / Isaiah 60:14)
http://www.holycitybiblecode.org (Ecl.9:12-16)Quote (Ed J @ Oct. 01 2010,15:19) Quote (Stu @ Oct. 01 2010,14:25) Quote (Ed J @ Oct. 01 2010,13:39) Quote (Stu @ Oct. 01 2010,12:53) Quote (Ed J @ Oct. 01 2010,11:59) Quote (Stu @ Oct. 01 2010,11:41) The biological definition of life includes factors such as cellular composition, need for nutrition, ability to reproduce, conversion of energy by respiration, and excretion. Does your god conform to the biological definition of life?
Stuart
Hi Stuart,John 1:3 says that life was in him.
Why are you trying to 'spin' it into saying he was life?
Those are two completely different things.No wonder you have such trouble understanding “The Bible”,
comprehension is a necessary facet to understanding it's wisdom!Ed J (Joshua 22:34)
http://www.holycitybiblecode.org
It's not me spinning. You said life comes from life. Does your god have biological life or not?Stuart
Hi Stuart,The wording is in English, you do understand English; No?
Ed J (Joshua 22:34)
http://www.holycitybiblecode.org
The wording is archaic. “Life in…” someone means they are not dead. That does not answer the question. Does your god respire, and thus qualify as the life that begets other life, or is your god a “spirit” and therefore not a form of biological life? If so, the creationist hypothesis that your spirit Friend breathed into dirt to make life is not consistent with life begetting life: the only model that does fit life begetting life is one where the first cell that replicated would be called life, and its appearance was not an act of begetting (or reproduction).Stuart
Hi Stuart,Do you follow pre-fabbed attack strategies from an Atheist site?
Because, you certainly don't pay attention to the illustrated Facts!
No wonder you're so gullible and naive as to swallow the lie of evilution!Let me tell you in a way that you can understand; Stuart.
The Earth has life in it; does that mean that the Earth is alive?Witnessing to a worldwide audience in behalf of YHVH!
יהוה האלהים (JEHOVAH GOD) YÄ-hä-vā hä ĔL-ō-Hêêm!
Ed J (Joshua 22:34 / Isaiah 49:16 / Isaiah 60:14)
http://www.holycitybiblecode.org (Ecl.9:12-16)
Are you telling me or asking me?Ed, is your god biologically alive or not? It is a really simple question that you seem unable or unwilling to answer.
Stuart
Quote (Stu @ Oct. 01 2010,16:21) Quote (Ed J @ Oct. 01 2010,15:19) Quote (Stu @ Oct. 01 2010,14:25) Quote (Ed J @ Oct. 01 2010,13:39) Quote (Stu @ Oct. 01 2010,12:53) Quote (Ed J @ Oct. 01 2010,11:59) Quote (Stu @ Oct. 01 2010,11:41) The biological definition of life includes factors such as cellular composition, need for nutrition, ability to reproduce, conversion of energy by respiration, and excretion. Does your god conform to the biological definition of life?
Stuart
Hi Stuart,John 1:3 says that life was in him.
Why are you trying to 'spin' it into saying he was life?
Those are two completely different things.No wonder you have such trouble understanding “The Bible”,
comprehension is a necessary facet to understanding it's wisdom!Ed J (Joshua 22:34)
http://www.holycitybiblecode.org
It's not me spinning. You said life comes from life. Does your god have biological life or not?Stuart
Hi Stuart,The wording is in English, you do understand English; No?
Ed J (Joshua 22:34)
http://www.holycitybiblecode.org
The wording is archaic. “Life in…” someone means they are not dead. That does not answer the question. Does your god respire, and thus qualify as the life that begets other life, or is your god a “spirit” and therefore not a form of biological life? If so, the creationist hypothesis that your spirit Friend breathed into dirt to make life is not consistent with life begetting life: the only model that does fit life begetting life is one where the first cell that replicated would be called life, and its appearance was not an act of begetting (or reproduction).Stuart
Hi Stuart,Do you follow pre-fabbed attack strategies from an Atheist site?
Because, you certainly don't pay attention to the illustrated Facts!
No wonder you're so gullible and naive as to swallow the lie of evilution!Let me tell you in a way that you can understand; Stuart.
The Earth has life in it; does that mean that the Earth is alive?Witnessing to a worldwide audience in behalf of YHVH!
יהוה האלהים (JEHOVAH GOD) YÄ-hä-vā hä ĔL-ō-Hêêm!
Ed J (Joshua 22:34 / Isaiah 49:16 / Isaiah 60:14)
http://www.holycitybiblecode.org (Ecl.9:12-16)
Are you telling me or asking me?Ed, is your god biologically alive or not? It is a really simple question that you seem unable or unwilling to answer.
Stuart
Hi Stuart,Since you refuse to answer my question, I must be telling you;
you 'are' asking pre-fabbed questions from an Atheist site!God is spiritual and not biological.
He exists both inside and outside of time at the same time.Hopefully you understand and are now willing to believe.
Not by a long shot; huh?You say you would believe if I could prove He exists;
But you refuse to look at the Proof!And the legitimate answers to your questions
you will treat incorrectly as nonsense, because you don't understand!1Cor.1:23 But we preach Christ crucified, unto the Jews a stumblingblock(an occasion of scandal),
and unto the Greeks foolishness(this is the part that applies to you as to what you think of God);1Cor:2:11: For what man knoweth the things of a man, save the spirit of man
which is in him? even so the things of God knoweth no man, but the Spirit of God.Ed J (Joshua 22:34)
http://www.holycitybiblecode.orgQuote (Ed J @ Oct. 01 2010,17:11) God is spiritual and not biological.
He exists both inside and outside of time at the same time.
OK, so your god is not biological. I agree with you: if I had been asked what scripture says about your god I would have come up with the same statement.That means that either “life begets life” is allegorical and not literally applicable, or if it is literal then Genesis 2:7 must be allegorical, because a spirit breathing into dirt is not life begeting life in any biological sense.
The real answer is that indeed life does beget life in the biological sense and it is only creationists who believe that it doesn't.
Stuart
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.
