- This topic is empty.
- AuthorPosts
- July 9, 2009 at 9:43 pm#136837KangarooJackParticipant
bodhitharta said:
Quote Immanuel is not the name of Jesus
and Jesus is not the name of GodThe name “Jesus” means “Jehovah saves.” Why is Christ's name Jesus if He is not Jehovah and Savior? The name “Jesus” does NOT belong to the Father.
thinker
July 9, 2009 at 9:46 pm#136839NickHassanParticipantHi TT,
Why would you think Jesus was his Father God YHWH because of his name YAHSHUA?Who do you think ELI-JAH is then?
July 9, 2009 at 9:53 pm#136843KangarooJackParticipantQuote (Nick Hassan @ July 10 2009,09:46) Hi TT,
Why would you think Jesus was his Father God YHWH because of his name YAHSHUA?Who do you think ELI-JAH is then?
Nick,
The name “Jesus” means “Jehovah saves.” It is NOT the Father's name. The name belongs to Christ ALONE! I challenge you to disprove this.thinker
July 9, 2009 at 9:59 pm#136848NickHassanParticipantHi TT,
So Jesus is not his own God?
GoodJuly 9, 2009 at 10:25 pm#136859KangarooJackParticipantQuote (Nick Hassan @ July 10 2009,09:59) Hi TT,
So Jesus is not his own God?
Good
Nick,
The name “Jesus” means “Jehovah saves.” It is NOT the name of the Father. No where in Scripture is the Father called “Jesus” (Jehovah saves).thinker
July 9, 2009 at 10:27 pm#136860NickHassanParticipantHi TT,
Exactly.
YHWH is God and Jesus is the Son of God.Why do you get him muddled up with his Dad?
July 9, 2009 at 10:34 pm#136866KangarooJackParticipantQuote (Nick Hassan @ July 10 2009,10:27) Hi TT,
Exactly.
YHWH is God and Jesus is the Son of God.Why do you get him muddled up with his Dad?
The name “Jesus” means “Jehovah saves.” It is NOT the name of the Father. The Father is NOT called “Jehovah saves” anywhere in Scripture.thinker
July 9, 2009 at 10:36 pm#136868NickHassanParticipantHi TT,
Great .
So you know the Father is differentiated from the Son?
Such differentiation occurs throughout the OT and the NT.They are not PARTS of a trinity god.
July 9, 2009 at 11:49 pm#136884bodhithartaParticipantQuote (thethinker @ July 10 2009,10:34) Quote (Nick Hassan @ July 10 2009,10:27) Hi TT,
Exactly.
YHWH is God and Jesus is the Son of God.Why do you get him muddled up with his Dad?
The name “Jesus” means “Jehovah saves.” It is NOT the name of the Father. The Father is NOT called “Jehovah saves” anywhere in Scripture.thinker
What do you think the name Joshua means?The English name Joshua is a rendering of the Hebrew: יהושע, “Yehoshua,” meaning means “Yahweh is Salvation,” “Yahweh delivers,” or “Yahweh rescues” from the Hebrew root ישע, “salvation,” “to deliver/be liberated,” or “to be victorious”[2] “salvation.”
So what were you saying?
July 10, 2009 at 2:06 am#136925NickHassanParticipantHi TT,
You seem to stand alone in your assertion that God has PARTS.
Surely your brothers will support you?July 10, 2009 at 8:20 am#136954KangarooJackParticipantQuote (bodhitharta @ July 10 2009,11:49) Quote (thethinker @ July 10 2009,10:34) Quote (Nick Hassan @ July 10 2009,10:27) Hi TT,
Exactly.
YHWH is God and Jesus is the Son of God.Why do you get him muddled up with his Dad?
The name “Jesus” means “Jehovah saves.” It is NOT the name of the Father. The Father is NOT called “Jehovah saves” anywhere in Scripture.thinker
What do you think the name Joshua means?The English name Joshua is a rendering of the Hebrew: יהושע, “Yehoshua,” meaning means “Yahweh is Salvation,” “Yahweh delivers,” or “Yahweh rescues” from the Hebrew root ישע, “salvation,” “to deliver/be liberated,” or “to be victorious”[2] “salvation.”
So what were you saying?
bd,
I knew you were going to bring up Joshua. Do you think I was not ready for that ? Note what Hebrews says about Joshua,Quote For if Joshua had given them rest, then he would not afterward have spoken of another day (Heb. 4:8) Joshua could not deliver salvation to the people. Jesus did. Show me from the new Testament where the Father is called by the name “Jesus” (Jehovah saves).
thinker
July 10, 2009 at 8:58 am#136957NickHassanParticipantQuote (thethinker @ July 10 2009,09:43) bodhitharta said: Quote Immanuel is not the name of Jesus
and Jesus is not the name of GodThe name “Jesus” means “Jehovah saves.” Why is Christ's name Jesus if He is not Jehovah and Savior? The name “Jesus” does NOT belong to the Father.
thinker
Hi TT,
The point BD makes is valid.You say Jesus is YHWH because of the meaning of his name but you will not accept that Joshua is YWHW by the same reasoning though the name is identical.
You have reached another dead end.
Jesus is the Son of YHWH.
July 10, 2009 at 3:00 pm#136974KangarooJackParticipantQuote (Nick Hassan @ July 10 2009,20:58) Quote (thethinker @ July 10 2009,09:43) bodhitharta said: Quote Immanuel is not the name of Jesus
and Jesus is not the name of GodThe name “Jesus” means “Jehovah saves.” Why is Christ's name Jesus if He is not Jehovah and Savior? The name “Jesus” does NOT belong to the Father.
thinker
Hi TT,
The point BD makes is valid.You say Jesus is YHWH because of the meaning of his name but you will not accept that Joshua is YWHW by the same reasoning though the name is identical.
You have reached another dead end.
Jesus is the Son of YHWH.
Nick,
The point bd makes is not at all valid. Joshua did not bring the people into God's rest. Jesus did. The angel said that His name was to be called “Jesus” because He “SHALL save” His people from their sins. Joshua never did this. Furthermore, the angel committed idolatry by anti-trinitarian standards. For the angel said that we are “HIS” (Christ's) people. Yet God says “You are MY people.”Therefore, Jesus is God just as His name indicates.
thinker
July 10, 2009 at 4:24 pm#136993bodhithartaParticipantQuote (thethinker @ July 10 2009,20:20) Quote (bodhitharta @ July 10 2009,11:49) Quote (thethinker @ July 10 2009,10:34) Quote (Nick Hassan @ July 10 2009,10:27) Hi TT,
Exactly.
YHWH is God and Jesus is the Son of God.Why do you get him muddled up with his Dad?
The name “Jesus” means “Jehovah saves.” It is NOT the name of the Father. The Father is NOT called “Jehovah saves” anywhere in Scripture.thinker
What do you think the name Joshua means?The English name Joshua is a rendering of the Hebrew: יהושע, “Yehoshua,” meaning means “Yahweh is Salvation,” “Yahweh delivers,” or “Yahweh rescues” from the Hebrew root ישע, “salvation,” “to deliver/be liberated,” or “to be victorious”[2] “salvation.”
So what were you saying?
bd,
I knew you were going to bring up Joshua. Do you think I was not ready for that ? Note what Hebrews says about Joshua,Quote For if Joshua had given them rest, then he would not afterward have spoken of another day (Heb. 4:8) Joshua could not deliver salvation to the people. Jesus did. Show me from the new Testament where the Father is called by the name “Jesus” (Jehovah saves).
thinker
Isaiah also means the same thing, what do you have for that?July 10, 2009 at 4:41 pm#136999KangarooJackParticipantbodhitharta siad:
Quote Isaiah also means the same thing, what do you have for that? Did Isaiah die for the sins of his people? All names have their complete fulfillment and realization in Christ. The child was called “Jesus” because “He SHALL save.”
thinker
July 10, 2009 at 5:39 pm#137012bodhithartaParticipantQuote (thethinker @ July 11 2009,04:41) bodhitharta siad: Quote Isaiah also means the same thing, what do you have for that? Did Isaiah die for the sins of his people? All names have their complete fulfillment and realization in Christ. The child was called “Jesus” because “He SHALL save.”
thinker
You said the name speaks for itself but you move the goal post everytime your folly is exposed.All prophets that died, died for the sins of his people.
July 10, 2009 at 6:05 pm#137015KangarooJackParticipantbodhitharta said:
Quote You said the name speaks for itself but you move the goal post everytime your folly is exposed. All prophets that died, died for the sins of his people.
To All,
There you have it. Bod says that “all prophets died for the sins of his people.”I need say no more.
thinker
July 10, 2009 at 6:12 pm#137016NickHassanParticipantQuote (thethinker @ July 11 2009,03:00) Quote (Nick Hassan @ July 10 2009,20:58) Quote (thethinker @ July 10 2009,09:43) bodhitharta said: Quote Immanuel is not the name of Jesus
and Jesus is not the name of GodThe name “Jesus” means “Jehovah saves.” Why is Christ's name Jesus if He is not Jehovah and Savior? The name “Jesus” does NOT belong to the Father.
thinker
Hi TT,
The point BD makes is valid.You say Jesus is YHWH because of the meaning of his name but you will not accept that Joshua is YWHW by the same reasoning though the name is identical.
You have reached another dead end.
Jesus is the Son of YHWH.
Nick,
The point bd makes is not at all valid. Joshua did not bring the people into God's rest. Jesus did. The angel said that His name was to be called “Jesus” because He “SHALL save” His people from their sins. Joshua never did this. Furthermore, the angel committed idolatry by anti-trinitarian standards. For the angel said that we are “HIS” (Christ's) people. Yet God says “You are MY people.”Therefore, Jesus is God just as His name indicates.
thinker
Hi TT,
The point you made was not about actions but about the name.
It has proven invalid.July 10, 2009 at 6:18 pm#137019KangarooJackParticipantQuote (Nick Hassan @ July 11 2009,06:12) Quote (thethinker @ July 11 2009,03:00) Quote (Nick Hassan @ July 10 2009,20:58) Quote (thethinker @ July 10 2009,09:43) bodhitharta said: Quote Immanuel is not the name of Jesus
and Jesus is not the name of GodThe name “Jesus” means “Jehovah saves.” Why is Christ's name Jesus if He is not Jehovah and Savior? The name “Jesus” does NOT belong to the Father.
thinker
Hi TT,
The point BD makes is valid.You say Jesus is YHWH because of the meaning of his name but you will not accept that Joshua is YWHW by the same reasoning though the name is identical.
You have reached another dead end.
Jesus is the Son of YHWH.
Nick,
The point bd makes is not at all valid. Joshua did not bring the people into God's rest. Jesus did. The angel said that His name was to be called “Jesus” because He “SHALL save” His people from their sins. Joshua never did this. Furthermore, the angel committed idolatry by anti-trinitarian standards. For the angel said that we are “HIS” (Christ's) people. Yet God says “You are MY people.”Therefore, Jesus is God just as His name indicates.
thinker
Hi TT,
The point you made was not about actions but about the name.
It has proven invalid.
Wrong Nick. My point was always about the actions which the name indicates. Read this thread over again. Did you notice that bd now says that the prophets died for the sins of peple? Some of you anti-trinitarians will say anything to avoid giving Jesus His due allegiance.thinker
July 10, 2009 at 6:20 pm#137021NickHassanParticipantHi TT,
Will you no longer take responsibility for these words of yours?” Why is Christ's name Jesus if He is not Jehovah and Savior?”
That is also the name of Joshua
- AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.