- This topic is empty.
- AuthorPosts
- December 2, 2012 at 10:33 am#323180StuParticipant
The Gish Gallop is named after Duane Gish, the debating style of whom is characterised as this by the Holy Wikipedia:
Gish has been characterized as using a rapid-fire approach during a debate, presenting arguments and changing topics very quickly. Eugenie Scott, executive director of the National Center for Science Education, has dubbed this approach the “Gish Gallop,” describing it as “where the creationist is allowed to run on for 45 minutes or an hour, spewing forth torrents of error that the evolutionist hasn't a prayer of refuting in the format of a debate” and criticized Gish for failing to answer objections raised by his opponents.
Since the coining of the phrase “Gish Gallop” several other religious apologists have been attributed with the use of this debating technique, notable examples being Dinesh D'Souza and William Lane Craig. The phrase has also come to be used as a pejorative to describe similar debate styles employed by proponents of other, usually fringe beliefs, such as homeopathy or the moon landing hoax.
AWHN's use of the Gish Gallop in an adjacent thread is evidence that he is running scared of actually discussing anything critically. If he wanted to make one point at a time I'd be very happy to take him on.
Presumably he doesn't mind being thought of as extremely rude for his abuse of the forum in this way.
Stuart
July 28, 2013 at 6:10 pm#351606AnastasParticipantThen use the technique back at him to show the futility of a debate done in such a way. OR be the bigger man and answer the questions he poses to you one by one. Often when one is losing at anything, one will start to look for excuses. “I ain't wrong… they just cheatin”
- AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.