- This topic has 169 replies, 18 voices, and was last updated 3 years, 6 months ago by
.
- Posts
In its simpler Old Testament (shama‘; hupakoe) meaning the word signifies “to hear,” “to listen.”
It carries with it, however, the ethical significance of hearing with reverence and obedient assent.
In the New Testament a different origin is suggestive of “hearing under” or of subordinating one’s self to the person or thing heard, hence, “to obey.”
There is another New Testament usage, however, indicating persuasion from, peithomai.
The relation expressed is twofold: first, human, as between master and servant, and particularly between parents and children.
The test of fellowship with Yahweh in the Old Testament is obedience.
The bond of union with the Messiah in the New Testament is obedience through faith, by which they become identified and the believer becomes a disciple.
Quote (Constitutionalist @ Dec. 09 2009,02:01) Quote (Jesus name follower of Christ @ Dec. 08 2009,06:39) is he hear
Nice pun.
Is that the reason you started your own topic on Antichrist?Georg
Quote (banana @ Dec. 08 2009,07:15) Quote (Constitutionalist @ Dec. 09 2009,02:01) Quote (Jesus name follower of Christ @ Dec. 08 2009,06:39) is he hear
Nice pun.
Is that the reason you started your own topic on Antichrist?Georg
It is a poll.hi con
it is because our sins that we have to change our thinking and beavor to make it aproved by God ,if we do have no sin then we do not have to change ,this would mean we are liars,
we have to bring our self to be aproved by Christ he is the one to aprove if there is any aproval to be given.Quote (terraricca @ Dec. 09 2009,05:36) hi con
it is because our sins that we have to change our thinking and beavor to make it aproved by God ,if we do have no sin then we do not have to change ,this would mean we are liars,
we have to bring our self to be aproved by Christ he is the one to aprove if there is any aproval to be given.
Bravo, did good on this one.Georg
Quote (Jesus name follower of Christ @ Dec. 09 2009,08:56) there are signs of the anti Christ now one being toni blair is the middle east peace onvoy
followerTony Blair maybe anti Christ, but he is not the Antichrist the bible speaks of.
Georg
hi all
go back to the antichrist or and the man of lawlessness, well i know what he is not ,a christian returning to the world,a soldier fighting a catholic countryQuote (banana @ Dec. 09 2009,01:04) just a reminder, my article on “The Antichrist”, is on page 4 of this post. Georg
What article?Quote (Constitutionalist @ Dec. 09 2009,22:55) Quote (banana @ Dec. 09 2009,01:04) just a reminder, my article on “The Antichrist”, is on page 4 of this post. Georg
What article?
RonWe are on page 12, go back to page 4.
hi georg
you do not answer my question were is it written “the fig tree = Israel ?
until you answer that question ,you will be quoted as a rejector of thruth.
to me and who ever read this quote,the scriptures are not yours to twist ,there is no dishonnor of not knowing the book of reveletion.
but is by twisting the scripture to your ego.Quote (terraricca @ Dec. 10 2009,07:50) hi georg
you do not answer my question were is it written “the fig tree = Israel ?
until you answer that question ,you will be quoted as a rejector of thruth.
to me and who ever read this quote,the scriptures are not yours to twist ,there is no dishonnor of not knowing the book of reveletion.
but is by twisting the scripture to your ego.
TerrariccaThere are no more figs, I ate them all.
Georg
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.
