The “AKJV Bible”

[NickHassan]

hi T,
What do you mean?
I guess there must be an accusation in there somewhere?

[terraricca]

Quote (Nick Hassan @ Mar. 13 2012,19:26)

hi T, What do you mean? I guess there must be an accusation in there somewhere?

N

you tell me ;

Quote

Nick Hassan Group: Regular Members Posts: 48658 Joined: June 2004 Posted: Mar. 12 2012,02:38 Hi Ed, So the KJV translators chose to translate this verse in Dan 3 in a bizzare way. Could it have been to satify the triune backers?

[Ed J]

Quote (Ed J @ Mar. 11 2012,03:31)

Quote (Ed J @ Mar. 07 2012,12:40) Quote (Ed J @ Mar. 06 2012,19:17) Hi Nick, “Did not we cast three men bound into the midst of the fire? They answered and said unto the king, True, O king. He answered and said, Lo, I see four men loose, walking in the midst of the fire, and they have no hurt; and the form of the fourth is like the Son of God .” (Dan 3:24-25) 1 Peter 1:7 That the trial of your faith, being much more precious than of gold that perisheth, though it (their faith) be tried with fire, might be found unto praise and honor and glory at the appearing of Jesus Christ: God bless Ed J Hi Nick, These similarities are not enough to persuade you? God bless Ed J Hi Nick, OK, how about this one than? (Deut.19:15)… 1 Peter 4:12-13 Beloved, think it not strange concerning the fiery trial which is to try you, as though some strange thing happened unto you: But rejoice, inasmuch as ye are partakers of Christ's sufferings; that, when his glory shall be revealed, ye may be glad also with exceeding joy. God bless Ed J (Joshua 22:34) http://www.holycitybiblecode.org

Hi Nick,

I gave you two corroborative bible verses,
plus the biblical principal of the Son of God
being the Savior of all of humanity. You can
choose to believe whatever you want, but if
you want to persuade me, you will need to use
biblical evidence rather than only what you believe.

God bless
Ed J (Joshua 22:34)
http://www.holycitybiblecode.org

[NickHassan]

hi Ed,
Those verses did not say the same thing.
Thsu they did not witness.

The SON OF GOD was not seen in the fire.
He was not on earth prior to the jordan.

[NickHassan]

Hi ED,
Your whole work is in defence of shoddy work by translators.
Why?

[Ed J]

spin

[NickHassan]

Hi ED,
Yes why spin?
There is no reason to state it was THE SON OF GOD in the fire except triune influence?.

[Ed J]

Quote (Nick Hassan @ Mar. 13 2012,17:29)

Hi ED, Yes why spin?

Hi Nick,

I guess that is what you want to do:   'shoddy work by translators'

Why would you say such 'spin'?

God bless
Ed J (Joshua 22:34)
http://www.holycitybiblecode.org

[NickHassan]

Hi Ed,
You think they are uniquely correct in their choice?
So be it.

[terraricca]

Quote (Nick Hassan @ Mar. 14 2012,00:29)

Hi ED, Yes why spin? There is no reason to state it was THE SON OF GOD in the fire except triune influence?.

N

it may have been a pagan king but he recognized the true God,and the records of it all was made by Daniel a righteous man by inspiration ,are you now try to establish that you are wiser than Daniel ?

[NickHassan]

Hi T,
So you think Nebuchadnezzar not only knew God but could even recognise the promised Son?

Why would you defend carnal translator's choices?

[terraricca]

Quote (Nick Hassan @ Mar. 14 2012,16:28)

Hi T, So you think Nebuchadnezzar not only knew God but could even recognise the promised Son? Why would you defend carnal translator's choices?

N

you mixing things up again ,do you not find your question out of the universe of the time ????

[Ed J]

Quote (kerwin @ June 09 2013,05:53)

Quote (Ed J @ June 08 2013,17:08) Hi Kerwin, The bishops bible used the Latin Vulgate, The AKJV Bible used “The Majority Texts.” God bless Ed J (Joshua 22:34) http://www.holycitybiblecode.org Ed, The Textus Receptus has some parts that are back-translated from the Latin Vulgate. A 3rd edition did reference the Codex Bezae.

Hi Kerwin,

Robert Stephanus was a “GREEK SCHOLAR”, and it was him who complied
all the Greek texts into one text in 1551; he also made the Bible Chapter breaks.

God bless
Ed J (Joshua 22:34)
http://www.holycitybiblecode.org

[kerwin]

Quote (Ed J @ June 09 2013,17:50)

Quote (kerwin @ June 09 2013,05:53) Quote (Ed J @ June 08 2013,17:08) Hi Kerwin, The bishops bible used the Latin Vulgate, The AKJV Bible used “The Majority Texts.” God bless Ed J (Joshua 22:34) http://www.holycitybiblecode.org Ed, The Textus Receptus has some parts that are back-translated from the Latin Vulgate. A 3rd edition did reference the Codex Bezae. Hi Kerwin, Robert Stephanus was a “GREEK SCHOLAR”, and it was him who complied all the Greek texts into one text in 1551; he also made the Bible Chapter breaks. God bless Ed J (Joshua 22:34) http://www.holycitybiblecode.org

Ed J.

He only used a few manuscripts and they were most likely not Koine Greek which only remained a living language into the 300's. Whether or not they were they were not complete and so translated the Latin Vulgate to fill the missing parts.

[Ed J]

Hi Kerwin,

Robert Stephanus is Greek,
AND what are these so-called
missing pieces you're referring to?

God bless
Ed J (Joshua 22:34)
http://www.holycitybiblecode.org

[kerwin]

Quote (Ed J @ June 10 2013,05:51)

Hi Kerwin, Robert Stephanus is Greek, AND what are these so-called missing pieces you're referring to? God bless Ed J (Joshua 22:34) http://www.holycitybiblecode.org

Ed. J,

Robert I Estienne was born in Parish. His Latin name is Robertus Stephanus and he was called Robert Stephens by later English writers. He is called Robert Stephanus in some circles today.

I obtained most of my information in an wikipedia article about the Textus Receptus.

[palal]

I thought the AKV had obvious translation errors?

[Proclaimer]

It does. The Comma Johanneum being the most glaring example.

The AKJV wasn't translated from the oldest and more relaible texts.
The AKJV was also translated before the discovery of the Dea Sea Scrolls.

While no translation is perfect, people who believe that the AKJV is, are clearly wrong. IMO, it is the least accurate, but still accurate enough to get the truth.

[kerwin]

Quote (palal @ June 11 2013,07:46)

I thought the AKV had obvious translation errors?

palal,

It does. So does every other version as far as I know. I use it anyways.

[Ed J]

Quote (Ed J @ June 10 2013,10:51)

Hi Kerwin, Robert Stephanus is Greek, AND what are these so-called missing pieces you're referring to? God bless Ed J (Joshua 22:34) http://www.holycitybiblecode.org

So, what are theses “so-called” missing pieces you are referring to?

[Author]

Posts