The “AKJV Bible”

[NickHassan]

Hi Ed,
Infallibillity based on men and their choices in any form is unwise.
Your position is not as comfortable as you claim.

TEST ALL THINGS AND HOLD FAST TO WHAT IS GOOD

[Ed J]

Quote (Nick Hassan @ Feb. 19 2012,06:25)

Hi ED, Do you say the manuscripts chosen by men for the AKJV are the only perfect copies? If so why?

Hi Nick,

Because the “AKJV Bible” was translated from the Greek majority text.
The more modern translations were translated from a blending of two
corrupted Greek copies called 'Codex Sinaiticvs' and 'Codex Vaticanvs'.

'Codex Vaticanvs' was in the found in the Vatican library,
and 'Codex Sinaiticvs' was found at Alexandra; these copies
DO NOT agree with each other in over 3,000 instances. They,
however, were blended together in a new Greek text called The
Nestle's text. This Nestle's text was made as a Catholic agenda to…

1. Discredit the reformers Bible
2. Flood the English with corrupt versions.
3. Force the Protestants back under Papal authority.

Did you not watch any of the videos I provided for you, Nick?

“Testus Receptus” is just a fancy name for the blending of the Greek Majority texts
into one revised copy, this is what the AKJV Bible used. 1John 5:7 must have been added
into a some of the earliest copies. Because many copies of the Greek have this verse missing.

Your brother
in Christ, Jesus.
Ed J (Joshua 22:34)
holycitybiblecode.org
PS> Thanks for asking!
I just hope you will take this information seriously.

[Ed J]

Hi Nick,

We have better tools, like the Strong's concordance,
which has defined each word its original language. Plus I,
many times will use Google translations as different unbiased
translation of the “Testus Receptus” to insure to no bias. However
you always need “some” interpretive facets to fully translate the text.

God bless
Ed J (Joshua 22:34)
http://www.holycitybiblecode.org

[NickHassan]

Hi ED,
You think the MAJORITY text is infallible?
You trust in the wordsmiths?

Neither catholic nor protestant is relevant-political variations of the world's false church.

[Ed J]

Quote (Nick Hassan @ Feb. 19 2012,09:55)

Hi ED, You think the MAJORITY text is infallible? You trust in the wordsmiths? Neither catholic nor protestant is relevant-political variations of the world's false church.

Hi Nick,

The only thing the “Textus Receptus” does, is to make the
many thousands of translations into a most accurate one.

1John 5:7 was clearly added, but they did NOT know.
Man is fallible, but God's word is infallible! (Link)

God bless
Ed J (Joshua 22:34)
http://www.holycitybiblecode.org

[NickHassan]

Hi ED,
The fact that it is the MAJORITY text gives no guarantee of greater accuracy.
These texts are just the commonest, and the least ancient

[Ed J]

Quote (Nick Hassan @ Feb. 19 2012,19:14)

Hi ED, The fact that it is the MAJORITY text gives no guarantee of greater accuracy. These texts are just the commonest, and the least ancient

Hi Nick,

How old a text is, has NO bearing on its accuracy;
unless it it the original text; which is since long gone.

God bless
Ed J (Joshua 22:34)
http://www.holycitybiblecode.org

[NickHassan]

Hi ED,
I make no claim of superiority of any version.
You do.

[terraricca]

Quote (Ed J @ Feb. 20 2012,02:06)

Quote (Nick Hassan @ Feb. 19 2012,09:55) Hi ED, You think the MAJORITY text is infallible? You trust in the wordsmiths? Neither catholic nor protestant is relevant-political variations of the world's false church. Hi Nick, The only thing the “Textus Receptus” does, is to make the many thousands of translations into a most accurate one. 1John 5:7 was clearly added, but they did NOT know. Man is fallible, but God's word is infallible! (Link) God bless Ed J (Joshua 22:34) http://www.holycitybiblecode.org

EDJ

1John 5:7 was clearly added, but they did NOT know.

BUT THIS IS IN THE kjv

THIS IS TOTALLY CANCELLING OUT YOUR ALLEGATION THAT THE KJV IS ANY BETTER THAN ANY OTHER,HOW MANY OTHER THINGS ARE IN THERE LIKE THIS ONE

THE FINDS OF THE DEAD SEA SCROLLS ARE IN THE MODERN TRANSLATION NO???

[Ed J]

Quote (terraricca @ Feb. 20 2012,04:04)

EDJ THE FINDS OF THE DEAD SEA SCROLLS ARE IN THE MODERN TRANSLATION NO???

Hi Pierre,

Please explain what you are talking about here?

God bless
Ed J (Joshua 22:34)
http://www.holycitybiblecode.org

[NickHassan]

Hi ED,
Dan 3.25
25He answered and said, Lo, I see four men loose, walking in the midst of the fire, and they have no hurt; and the form of the fourth is like the Son of God.

Do you agree that this is a misleading KJV verse written unnecessarily as if to show Yashua was in the fire?

It is rendered as 'a son of the gods” in others.

[Ed J]

Hi Nick, what makes you think it wasn't(?) Yashua walking in the fire with them?

1 Peter 1:7 That the trial of your faith, being much more precious than of gold that perisheth, though it be tried with fire,
might be found unto praise and honor and glory at the appearing of Jesus Christ:

God bless
Ed J (Joshua 22:34)
http://www.holycitybiblecode.org

[NickHassan]

Hi Ed,
Jesus was not on earth before his birth.
The Spirit of Christ was in the prophets and as the Rock.
But there are no reasons why the S should be capitalised and THE put in is there?

[NickHassan]

Hi Ed,
Jesus Christ did not need to be tried with fire centuries before his baptism of blood.

[Ed J]

Quote (Nick Hassan @ Mar. 06 2012,17:35)

Hi Ed, Jesus was not on earth before his birth. The Spirit of Christ was in the prophets and as the Rock. But there are no reasons why the S should be capitalised  and THE put in is there?

Hi Nick,

Your question calls for speculation.
1Peter 1:7 seems to suggest Dan 3.25
was translated correctly in the “AKJV Bible”.

“in the mouth of two or three witnesses
every word may be established.” (Matt.18:16)

God bless
Ed J (Joshua 22:34)
http://www.holycitybiblecode.org

[NickHassan]

Hi Ed,
You think one verse repeats the truth of the other?
In what way?

[Ed J]

Hi Nick,

“Did not we cast three men bound into the midst of the fire? They answered and said unto the king,
True, O king. He answered and said, Lo, I see four men loose, walking in the midst of the fire,
and they have no hurt; and the form of the fourth is like the Son of God .” (Dan 3:24-25)

1 Peter 1:7 That the trial of your faith, being much more precious than of gold that perisheth,
though it (their faith) be tried with fire, might be found unto praise and honor and glory at the appearing of Jesus Christ:

God bless
Ed J (Joshua 22:34)
http://www.holycitybiblecode.org

[NickHassan]

Hi ED,
The words have some similarities when you add THE SON OF GOD but the whole is vastly different.
Vague similarities are not relevant in 2Cor 13.1
It does not witness.

[NickHassan]

Hi Ed,
The viewers of those in the fire were not familiar with sight of THE SON OF GOD so why would you think they said the being resembled him?
They were more likely to be familiar with angels being called sons of God.[jb1.6, jb 2.1, jb 38 7, ps 29.1, ps 82.6, ps 89.6 etc]

So beyond your vain hope of KJV infallibility why do you think the KJV translators got it right here??

[Ed J]

Quote (Nick Hassan @ Mar. 07 2012,04:08)

Hi Ed, The viewers of those in the fire were not familiar with sight of THE SON OF GOD so why would you think they said the being resembled him? They were more likely to be familiar with angels being called sons of God.[jb1.6, jb 2.1, jb 38 7, ps 29.1, ps 82.6, ps 89.6 etc] So beyond your vain hope of KJV infallibility why do you think the KJV translators got it right here??

Hi Nick,

I say the “AKJV Bible” is inspired, not infallible.
If you intend to quote me, please
quote me accurately; OK?

Your brother
in Christ, Jesus.
Ed J (Joshua 22:34)
holycitybiblecode.org

[Author]

Posts