- This topic is empty.
- AuthorPosts
- July 13, 2011 at 2:53 pm#252267Ed JParticipant
Quote (Stu @ July 13 2011,07:22) Quote (Ed J @ July 13 2011,02:40) Quote (Stu @ July 12 2011,09:06)
I quoted the complete sentence Ed: “There is no god.” is a complete sentence.Stuart
Hi Stuart,Produce, what verse are you claiming?
God bless
Ed J
http://www.holycitybiblecode.org
I am not claiming a whole verse, I am claiming that “There is no god” constitutes a complete sentence, which is what you asked for.Stuart
Hi Stuart,Perhaps you misunderstood what I was asking you to produce.
Produce the verse you say the whole sentence comes from; OK? (1Thess.5:21)July 13, 2011 at 9:27 pm#252302StuParticipantI mentioned Ps 14:1 and you replied with another example. Did you forget that?
Stuart
July 13, 2011 at 10:33 pm#252315Ed JParticipantQuote (Stu @ July 14 2011,08:27) I mentioned Ps 14:1 and you replied with another example. Did you forget that? Stuart
Hi Stuart,Here is the complete sentence… “The fool hath said in his heart, there is no God.” (Psalms 14:1)
Can you now see the information you were presenting was wrong?
God bless
Ed J (Joshua 22:34)
http://www.holycitybiblecode.orgJuly 14, 2011 at 2:19 am#252357StuParticipantYou didn't ask for a complete verse, you asked for a complete sentence. “There is no god” is a complete sentence.
See how wrong quote-mining is?
Stuart
July 14, 2011 at 3:56 am#252369Ed JParticipantQuote (Stu @ July 14 2011,13:19) You didn't ask for a complete verse, you asked for a complete sentence. “There is no god” is a complete sentence. See how wrong quote-mining is?
Stuart
Hi Stuart,I showed you the complete sentence, yet you deny it; why?
July 14, 2011 at 12:21 pm#252402TimothyVIParticipantHi Stu,
I don't think that Ed understands what it is that you were illustrating. Perhaps you are being too subtle.Tim
July 14, 2011 at 1:15 pm#252406StuParticipantQuote (Ed J @ July 14 2011,14:56) Quote (Stu @ July 14 2011,13:19) You didn't ask for a complete verse, you asked for a complete sentence. “There is no god” is a complete sentence. See how wrong quote-mining is?
Stuart
Hi Stuart,I showed you the complete sentence, yet you deny it; why?
Here is some more mining for you Ed:Matthew 18:8-9 it is better for thee to enter into life with one eye
1 Corinthians 14:35 it is a shame for women to speak
1 John 2:22 denieth that Jesus is the Christ
2 John 7 confess not that Jesus Christ is come in the flesh
It’s only fair that if you can claim the quote mining of Darwin as valid that I can claim these as biblical truths.
Of course they are all sentences. Although not necessarily when written in your Book of Making Humans Four Different Ways, but then quote mining is OK, isn’t it Ed.
Stuart
July 14, 2011 at 1:17 pm#252407StuParticipantQuote (TimothyVI @ July 14 2011,23:21) Hi Stu,
I don't think that Ed understands what it is that you were illustrating. Perhaps you are being too subtle.Tim
I spent yesterday afternoon beating bricks with a hammer, so I have recent practice at the kind of subtlety needed!Stuart
July 14, 2011 at 4:57 pm#252422Ed JParticipantHi Stuart,
None of those are complete sentences either.
Apparently, truthfulness is not one of your strong points.July 14, 2011 at 7:53 pm#252439StuParticipantQuote (Ed J @ July 15 2011,03:57) Hi Stuart, None of those are complete sentences either.
Apparently, truthfulness is not one of your strong points.
Sorry, but if you put a capital letter at the start of each, and a dot at the end, they ARE full sentences.You mean they are not full verses.
Sheesh, as you say in America.
Stuart
July 14, 2011 at 8:40 pm#252443Ed JParticipantQuote (Stu @ July 15 2011,06:53) Quote (Ed J @ July 15 2011,03:57) Hi Stuart, None of those are complete sentences either.
Apparently, truthfulness is not one of your strong points.
Sorry, but if you put a capital letter at the start of each, and a dot at the end, they ARE full sentences.You mean they are not full verses.
Sheesh, as you say in America.
Stuart
Hi Stuart,No, and I will give you an example why it is not always the case…
There are many large cities in the United States, Chicago is one of the largest.
Chicago is one of the largest. …IS NOT A COMPLETE SENTENCE.Glad you recognized the error of your ways.
Your friend
Ed J (Joshua 22:34)
http://www.holycitybiblecode.orgJuly 15, 2011 at 5:40 am#252493StuParticipantLook Ed, I might be a pedant, but this is ridiculous. But then so is your numerology. These are all COMPLETE SENTENCES.
It is better for thee to enter into life with one eye.
It is a shame for women to speak.
Denieth that Jesus is the Christ.
(Denieth takes the form of the imperative there, so it is a complete sentence).
Confess not that Jesus Christ is come in the flesh.
(Same for confess, also the imperative).
I agree that Elizabethan English does not necessarily follow the same rules of grammar as today, but these are unquestionably sentences.
Habakkuk 2:16 Let thy foreskin be uncovered.
Stuart
July 15, 2011 at 6:05 am#252495Ed JParticipantQuote (Stu @ July 15 2011,16:40) Look Ed, I might be a pedant, but this is ridiculous. But then so is your numerology. These are all COMPLETE SENTENCES. It is better for thee to enter into life with one eye.
It is a shame for women to speak.
Denieth that Jesus is the Christ.
(Denieth takes the form of the imperative there, so it is a complete sentence).
Confess not that Jesus Christ is come in the flesh.
(Same for confess, also the imperative).
I agree that Elizabethan English does not necessarily follow the same rules of grammar as today, but these are unquestionably sentences.
Habakkuk 2:16 Let thy foreskin be uncovered.
Stuart
Hi Stuart,None of those are complete sentences.
Quote It is better for thee to enter into life with one eye.
Matt 18:9 And if thine eye offend thee, pluck it out, and cast it from thee:
it is better for thee to enter into life with one eye,
rather than having two eyes to be cast into hell fire.Quote It is a shame for women to speak.
1 Cor 14:35 And if they will learn any thing, let them ask their husbands at home:
for it is a shame for women to speak in the church.Quote Denieth that Jesus is the Christ.
1 John 2:22 Who is a liar but he that denieth that Jesus is the Christ?
He is antichrist, that denieth the Father and the Son.Quote Confess not that Jesus Christ is come in the flesh.
2 John 1:7 For many deceivers are entered into the world,
who confess not that Jesus Christ is come in the flesh. This is a deceiver and an antichrist.Quote Let thy foreskin be uncovered.
Hab.2:16 Thou art filled with shame for glory: drink thou also, and let thy foreskin be uncovered:
the cup of the LORD's right hand shall be turned unto thee, and shameful spewing shall be on thy glory.None of those are complete sentences! …try again.
July 15, 2011 at 7:15 am#252502StuParticipantEd, is this a complete sentence?
The quick brown fox jumped over the lazy dog.
Remember, now, if you say yes, then you are wrong above.
Stuart
July 15, 2011 at 8:23 am#252503Ed JParticipantQuote (Stu @ July 15 2011,18:15) Ed, is this a complete sentence? The quick brown fox jumped over the lazy dog.
Remember, now, if you say yes, then you are wrong above.
Stuart
Hi Stuart,Where did you get that; what's the complete sentence it came from?
God bless
Ed J
http://www.holycitybiblecode.orgJuly 15, 2011 at 10:14 am#252510ProclaimerParticipantA complete sentence expresses a complete thought.
A predicate is one of the two main parts of a sentence.Expresses a complete thought.
Two main parts of a sentence.July 15, 2011 at 1:08 pm#252523princessParticipantI disagree T8, predicates are added gravy to a sentence.
ex:
Jesus wept. Stuart smiled. T8 sneezed. Edj listened. Princess laughed. Come here. Stay there. Yes. No. Maybe so. who knows. possible. how come. don't know. okay. the end.Stuart smiled, at the cat.
T8 sneezed, due to his allergies
Edj listened, for the first time
Princess laughed at Stuart smiling at the cat.there is no god. full sentence. however in Stuarts case, he should plural god, for he does not believe in any. technically.
the quick brown fox jumped over the lazy dog. typing 101.
July 15, 2011 at 1:48 pm#252525StuParticipantStuart stopped weeping temporarily at the thought there were posters on the forum capable of determining what a sentence is.
Thank Dawkins, he though.
He ended both his three-clause and his two-clause thoughts very teutonically each by use of a verb. The use of the third person did not imply egomania.
Stuart
July 16, 2011 at 12:20 pm#252619TimothyVIParticipantThis is much more fun than english 101.
Tim
July 18, 2011 at 10:41 pm#252862princessParticipantI agree Tim.
Edj is most assurdely trying to have Stuart understand his way which reflects this verse in Isiah:
(KJV) For precept must be upon precept, precept upon precept; line upon line, line upon line; here a little, and there a little:
Stuart is reflecting the line by line, Edj is telling him he is missing the precept of the text. My memory serves me correctly, I have even read a debate on the matter. I do recall someone adding context to the discussion. Which ever the case may be, Stuart is correct.
There is no god, is a full sentence.Which I really don't know what all the fuss is about when Stuart says this. Technically, for Stuart to say this he is not bound for the fire, I am pretty sure there is one that trumps the there is no god, as of yet Stuart has not expressed this. however the day is not over.
Much love to you Tim.
- AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.