- This topic is empty.
- AuthorPosts
- July 26, 2012 at 8:23 am#307166StuParticipant
Quote (Ed J @ July 26 2012,18:11) Quote (Stu @ July 26 2012,18:01) Quote (Ed J @ July 25 2012,18:35) Quote (Stu @ July 25 2012,17:15) Evolution isn't a matter of “chance” and it doesn't have a director either.
Evolution isn't a matter of “chance” – Evolution is a matter of “change” – Changing to believe a lie
You have no substantial objection against science, all you have is chanting.Stuart
Hi Stuart,Evolution is fiction, not Science.
God bless
Ed J (Joshua 22:34)
http://www.holycitybiblecode.org
No substance, just empty assertions.Evolution is falsifiable. It claims something that is testable.
You have not disproved it, you have just stated your personal dislike of it.
Reality doesn't care whether you like it or not.
Stuart
July 26, 2012 at 11:28 am#307172TimothyVIParticipantQuote (Ed J @ July 26 2012,18:11) Hi Stuart, Evolution is fiction, not Science.
God bless
Ed J (Joshua 22:34)
http://www.holycitybiblecode.org
Hi Ed.
On the surface you sound like an intelligent person.
It is truly impossible for me to believe that anyone with any intelligence can say what you just said in this day and age.Has your religion completely clouded your ability to use your intelligence to think rationally?
Tim
July 26, 2012 at 4:39 pm#307188terrariccaParticipantQuote (Stu @ July 27 2012,02:23) Quote (Ed J @ July 26 2012,18:11) Quote (Stu @ July 26 2012,18:01) Quote (Ed J @ July 25 2012,18:35) Quote (Stu @ July 25 2012,17:15) Evolution isn't a matter of “chance” and it doesn't have a director either.
Evolution isn't a matter of “chance” – Evolution is a matter of “change” – Changing to believe a lie
You have no substantial objection against science, all you have is chanting.Stuart
Hi Stuart,Evolution is fiction, not Science.
God bless
Ed J (Joshua 22:34)
http://www.holycitybiblecode.org
No substance, just empty assertions.Evolution is falsifiable. It claims something that is testable.
You have not disproved it, you have just stated your personal dislike of it.
Reality doesn't care whether you like it or not.
Stuart
stuevolution ,to me is like a trip someone makes and someone else sees where the first man take a train (in los Angeles) and currieous he go ask were this train his heading for and they tell him New york,so what the second man now know for sure is that the trip ON THE TRAIN WILL TAKE THE FIRST MAN TO NEW YORK STATION ,but he as no clue were he comes from or were he goes from there (New York)
July 26, 2012 at 8:37 pm#307199Ed JParticipantQuote (TimothyVI @ July 26 2012,22:28) Quote (Ed J @ July 26 2012,18:11) Hi Stuart, Evolution is fiction, not Science.
God bless
Ed J
Hi Ed.
(1)On the surface you sound like an intelligent person.
(2)It is truly impossible for me to believe that anyone with any intelligence can say what you just said in this day and age.(3)Has your religion completely clouded your ability to use your intelligence to think rationally?
Tim
Hi Tim,1) As do you.
2) Why, it's true.
3) What religion?God bless
Ed J (Joshua 22:34)
http://www.holycitybiblecode.orgJuly 27, 2012 at 6:37 am#307299StuParticipantQuote (terraricca @ July 27 2012,03:39) stu evolution ,to me is like a trip someone makes and someone else sees where the first man take a train (in los Angeles) and currieous he go ask were this train his heading for and they tell him New york,so what the second man now know for sure is that the trip ON THE TRAIN WILL TAKE THE FIRST MAN TO NEW YORK STATION ,but he as no clue were he comes from or were he goes from there (New York)
There's a lot going on between Los Angeles and New York.And Young Earth creationists would be able to walk that distance in a little over 1 hour.
Stuart
July 27, 2012 at 8:30 am#307301Ed JParticipantQuote (Stu @ July 27 2012,17:37) There's a lot going on between Los Angeles and New York. And Young Earth creationists would be able to walk that distance in a little over 1 hour.
Stuart
PlatitudeJuly 27, 2012 at 11:15 am#307307StuParticipantQuote (Ed J @ July 27 2012,19:30) Quote (Stu @ July 27 2012,17:37) There's a lot going on between Los Angeles and New York. And Young Earth creationists would be able to walk that distance in a little over 1 hour.
Stuart
Platitude
It's not actually. Do you know how I calculated the time?Stuart
July 30, 2012 at 10:46 pm#307666Ed JParticipantYes:
Young earth creationists vs. secular scientists calculations(time)
of how old the earth is converted into miles(distance).God bless
Ed J (Joshua 22:34)
http://www.holycitybiblecode.orgJuly 31, 2012 at 1:13 pm#307751StuParticipantQuote (Ed J @ July 31 2012,09:46) Yes: Young earth creationists vs. secular scientists calculations(time)
of how old the earth is converted into miles(distance).God bless
Ed J (Joshua 22:34)
http://www.holycitybiblecode.org
So, not a platitude. Good then.Stuart
August 1, 2012 at 1:16 am#307801davidParticipantQuote And, secondly, I would accept it if you could give a plausible explanation for why you cannot see gods with the unaided eye. Stu, I am curious what your thoughts are on extra spacial dimensions.
If you believed there were more dimensions, that would be a “plausible explanation” as to why you can't see “gods.”
Anyone, or anything in that 4th, 5th, etc dimensions would obviously not be discernible to us unless they pressed their hand along our 3 dimensional world. And then, the result would look miraculous, while at the same time, not being a miracle at all.
Of course, i'm not using this as proof of anything, and cannot do so, but, would this not be a “plausible explanation” for why you can't see certain things?
August 1, 2012 at 11:48 am#307822StuParticipantQuote (david @ Aug. 01 2012,12:16) Quote And, secondly, I would accept it if you could give a plausible explanation for why you cannot see gods with the unaided eye. Stu, I am curious what your thoughts are on extra spacial dimensions.
If you believed there were more dimensions, that would be a “plausible explanation” as to why you can't see “gods.”
Anyone, or anything in that 4th, 5th, etc dimensions would obviously not be discernible to us unless they pressed their hand along our 3 dimensional world. And then, the result would look miraculous, while at the same time, not being a miracle at all.
Of course, i'm not using this as proof of anything, and cannot do so, but, would this not be a “plausible explanation” for why you can't see certain things?
Sounds like you've invented a new religion there David.I don't think the word 'plausible' sits easily there.
Stuart
- AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.